Skip to main content

A Near Infrared Image of Forearm Subcutaneous Vein Extraction Using U-Net

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Electrical, Control and Computer Engineering

Abstract

Machine learning is in demand for acquiring important perceptions from big data or producing advanced revolutionary technologies and helps most the human tasks effortlessly. Healthcare is one of the industries that receive benefits from it. In the medical industry, venipuncture is one of the most crucial procedures, and locating the patient’s vein is the challenge faced by clinicians. The difficulty leads to multiple trials of venipuncture and causing harm such as bleeding, bruising, damaging surrounding cells, and other effects on the patient. If the case is worst, the patient might have to go to central venous access. Near-Infrared (NIR) has some strong properties such as non-invasive technique, low cost, and small size for the implementation locating the forearm subcutaneous vein; thus, it is a popular method among researchers. The technique has a weakness in that it requires image processing for the enhancement and the vein is more visible and located. This paper is approaching Deep Learning to automatically extract the forearm subcutaneous vein from the NIR image using two architectures: the standard convolutional neural network (CNN) with U-Net architecture and Residual U-Net architecture. The purpose of using two types of architecture is to compare the result and will use the highest accuracy method for the forearm subcutaneous vein extraction. The research found that the U-Net architecture with common CNN has results dice score of 0.6995 while deep residual architecture results 0.7599. It proves that the deep residual architecture has a better extraction than the common CNN block. This project is expected to expand to extract the live video of the forearm subcutaneous vein in future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. IBM Cloud Education, AI vs. machine learning vs. deep learning vs. neural networks: what’s the difference?. https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/ai-vs-machine-learning-vs-deep-learning-vs-neural-networks. Accessed 21 Feb 2021

  2. Cantor-peled G, Blechman O, Zehava MH (2016) Peripheral vein locating techniques. Imaging Med 8(3):83–88

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al Ghozali HK, Setiawardhana, Sigit R (2016) Vein detection system using infrared camera. In: Proceedings - 2016 International Electronics Symposium IES 2016, pp. 122–127

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alshamsi M (2018) Ultrasound-guided peripheral IV vs. standard technique in difficult vascular access patients by ICU nurses

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marsh N, Webster J, Larsen E, Cooke M, Mihala G, Rickard CM (2018) Observational study of peripheral intravenous catheter outcomes in adult hospitalized patients: a multivariable analysis of peripheral intravenous catheter failure. J Hosp Med 13(2):83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooke M, Ullman AJ, Ray-Barruel G, Wallis M, Corley A, Rickard CM (2018) Not ‘just’ an intravenous line: consumer perspectives on peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC). An international cross-sectional survey of 25 countries. PLoS One 13(2):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaur P, Rickard C, Domer GS, Glover KR (2019) Dangers of peripheral intravenous catheterization: the forgotten tourniquet and other patient safety considerations. Vignettes Patient Saf, vol 4

    Google Scholar 

  8. Armenteros-Yeguas V et al (2017) Prevalence of difficult venous access and associated risk factors in highly complex hospitalised patients. J Clin Nurs 26(23–24):4267–4275

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marathe M, Bhatt NS, Sundararajan R (2014) A novel wireless vein finder. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Circuits, Commun. Control Comput. I4C 2014, pp 277–280, November 2014

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van Tran T, Dau HS, Nguyen DT, Huynh SQ, Huynh LQ (2017) Design and enhance the vein recognition using near infrared light and projector. Sci Technol Dev J 20(K2):91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ayoub Y et al (2018) Diagnostic superficial vein scanner. In: 2018 International Conference on Computer and Applications ICCA 2018, pp 321–325, January 2020

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zaleha SH, Haliza N, Wahab A, Ithnin N, Ahmad J (2021) Microsleep accident prevention for smart vehicle via image processing integrated with artificial intelligent

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leipheimer JM et al (2020) First-in-human evaluation of a hand-held automated venipuncture device for rapid venous blood draws. Technology 7:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen AI, Balter ML, Maguire TJ, Yarmush ML (2020) Deep learning robotic guidance for autonomous vascular access. Nat Mach Intell 2(2):104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leli VM, Rubashevskii A, Sarachakov A, Rogov O, Dylov DV (2020) Near-infrared-to-visible vein imaging via convolutional neural networks and reinforcement learning. In: 16th IEEE International Conference on Control Automationa Robotics Vision, ICARCV 2020, pp 434–441

    Google Scholar 

  16. Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells WM, Frangi AF (2015) U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference Munich, Germany, 5–9 October 2015 Proceedings, Part III, vol 9351, no. Cvd, pp 12–20

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Z, Liu Q, Wang Y (2018) Road extraction by deep residual u-net. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 15(5):749–753

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tom E, Jeroen B, Maxim B, Dirk V, Frederik M, Raf B, Blaschko MB: Optimization for medical image segmentation: theory and practice when evaluating with dice score or Jaccard index. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 39(11):3679–3690. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2020.3002417

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by UTM Encouragement Research Grant Q.J130000.3851.19J08 and UTAR Research Fund (UTARFF) with the project number of IPSR/RMC/UTARRF/2019-C2/L06.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nur Haliza Abdul Wahab .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abdul Kadir, N.H. et al. (2022). A Near Infrared Image of Forearm Subcutaneous Vein Extraction Using U-Net. In: Md. Zain, Z., Sulaiman, M.H., Mohamed, A.I., Bakar, M.S., Ramli, M.S. (eds) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Electrical, Control and Computer Engineering. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 842. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8690-0_95

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics