Abstract
Over the last century, the life expectancy of the worldwide population has been increasing due to significant improvements in housing and healthcare. As a result, the number of older people in the worldwide population will continue to grow rapidly. Considering this, the concept of active living is an important strategy that can enhance healthy lifestyles by staying mentally, socially and physically active during aging. In this concept, digital technology can be a great tool that can help people to pursue those benefits. However, it seems that older people are particularly susceptible to the negative effects of technology directly caused by poorly designed products and user interfaces. For these reasons, this paper wants to discuss age-related changes and characteristics that usually impact the user experience, in order to delineate background information of those problems and then propose design methods and practices that can help designers to develop accessible and age-friendly products and interfaces. We use the concept of active living to verify if and how the existing products on the market are fostering the values of an active lifestyle, promoting independence, empowerment, self-esteem and self-efficacy. We conclude by exploring new conceptual and methodological design guidelines through scenario-based design for inspiring future research in this field.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For more information see: Pillo Health https://pillohealth.com/; ElliQ https://elliq.com/; Lumin https://mylumin.org; Compaan https://www.uwcompaan.nl/; GrandCare https://www.grandcare.com/; Claris Continuum https://www.clarishealthcare.com/; Cutii https://www.cutii.io/en/ (accessed August 3th 2021).
References
World Health Organization: WHO Methods and Data Sources for Life Tables 1990–2019. WHO Press, Geneve (2020)
Johnson, J., Finn, K.: Designing User Interfaces for an Aging Population: Towards Universal Design. Morgan Kaufmann, Cambridge (2017)
Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (1994)
Nielsen, J.: 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design, https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/. Last accessed 16 June 2021
Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Sharit, J. (eds.): Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)
Kline, D.W.: Aging effects on Vision: Impairment, Variability, Self-Report and Compensatory Change. In: Schaie, K.W., Charness, N. (eds.) Impact of Technology on Successful Aging, pp. 85–99. Springer, New York (2003)
Morrell, R.W., Holt, B.J., Dailey, S.R., Feldman, C., Mayhorn, C.B., Echt, K.V., Podany, K.I.: Older Adults and Information Technology: A Compendium of Scientific Research and Web Site Accessibility Guidelines. National Institute on Aging, Washington (2001)
Hawthorn, D.: Possible implications of aging for interface designers. Interact. Comput. 12, 507–528 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(99)00021-1
Schieber, F.: Human factors and aging: Identifying and compensating for age-related deficits in sensory and cognitive function. In: Schaie, K.W., Charness, N. (eds.) Influences of Technological Change on Individual Aging, pp. 42–84. Springer (2003)
Giaccardia, E., Kuijerb, L., Nevenc, L.: Design for resourceful ageing: intervening in the ethics of gerontechnology. Presented at the Future Focused Thinking - DRS International Conference 2016, 27–30 June, Brighton, United Kingdom June 25 (2016). https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2016.258
Antonietti, A., Balconi, M., Catellani, P., Marchetti, A.: Empowering skills for an active ageing and healthy living. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 203, 157–171 (2014)
Sellen, A., Rogers, Y., Harper, R., Rodden, T.: Reflecting human values in the digital age. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 52, 58–66 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1467247.1467265
Haddon, L.: Social exclusion and information and communication technologies: lessons from studies of single parents and the young elderly. New Media Soc. 2, 387–406 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444800002004001
Czaja, S.J., Charness, N., Fisk, A.D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S.N., Rogers, W.A., Sharit, J.: Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (create). Psychol. Aging 21, 333–352 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333
Hernández-Encuentra, E., Pousada, M., Gómez-Zúñiga, B.: ICT and older people: beyond usability. Educ. Gerontol. 35, 226–245 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270802466934
Mitzner, T.L., Boron, J.B., Fausset, C.B., Adams, A.E., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Dijkstra, K., Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A., Sharit, J.: Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 1710–1721 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020
O’Brien, M.A., Olson, K.E., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A., Sharit, J.: Understanding technology usage in older adults. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Society for Gerontechnology, pp. 1–5. Pisa (2008)
Olson, K.E., O’Brien, M.A., Rogers, W.A., Charness, N.: Diffusion of technology: frequency of use for younger and older adults. Ageing Int. 36, 123–145 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-010-9077-9
Reddy, G.R., Blackler, A., Popovic, V.: Adaptable interface framework for intuitively learnable product interfaces for people with diverse capabilities. In: Blackler, A. (ed.) Intuitive Interaction, pp. 113–127. CRC Press (2018). https://doi.org/10.1201/b22191-6
Hawthorn, D.: Designing effective interfaces for older users. https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/handle/10289/2538 (2006)
Zajicek, M.: Interface design for older adults. In: WUAUC’01: proceedings of the 2001 EC/NSF workshop on Universal accessibility of ubiquitous computing: providing for the elderly, pp. 60–65. Association for Computer Machinery, New York (2001). https://doi.org/10.1145/564526.564543
Gudur, R.: A framework to understanding factors that influence designing for older people. In: International Association of Societies of Design Research Conference 2019: Design Revolutions, pp. 1–15 (2019)
Czaja, S.J., Boot, W.R., Charness, N., Rogers, W.A.: Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2019)
Kolko, J.: Thoughts on Interaction Design: A Collection of Reflections. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2010)
Carroll, J.M. (ed.): Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. Wiley, New York (1995)
Carroll, J.M.: Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
World Health Organization: Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. WHO Press (2002)
Halaweh, H., Dahlin-Ivanoff, S., Svantesson, U., Willén, C.: Perspectives of Older Adults on Aging Well: A Focus Group Study. J. Aging Res. 2018, 1–9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9858252
Bowling, A.: Aspirations for Older Age in the 21st Century: What is Successful Aging? Int. J. Aging Human Dev. 64, 263–297 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2190/L0K1-87W4-9R01-7127
Foster, L., Walker, A.: Active and successful aging: a European policy perspective. Gerontologist 55, 83–90 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu028
Lawton, M.P., Brody, E.M.: Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9, 179–186 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179
Lawton, M.P.: A multidimensional view of quality of life in frail elders. In: The concept and measurement of quality of life in the frail elderly, pp. 3–27. Elsevier, New York (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-101275-5.50005-3
Sloane, P.D., Zimmerman, S., Williams, C.S., Reed, P.S., Gill, K.S., Preisser, J.S.: Evaluating the quality of life of long-term care residents with dementia. Gerontologist 45, 37–49 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/45.suppl_1.37
Lawton, M.P., Weisman, G.D., Sloane, P., Calkins, M.: Assessing environments for older people with chronic illness. J. Ment Health Aging. 3, 83–100 (1997)
Lawton, M.P.: Emotion in later life. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 10, 120–123 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00130
Kunzmann, U., Little, T.D., Smith, J.: Is age-related stability of subjective well-being a paradox? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the Berlin aging study. Psychol. Aging 15, 511–526 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.3.511
McNulty, J.K., Fincham, F.D.: Beyond positive psychology? Toward a contextual view of psychological processes and well-being. Am. Psychol. 67, 101–110 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024572
Bourassa, K.J., Memel, M., Woolverton, C., Sbarra, D.A.: Social participation predicts cognitive functioning in aging adults over time: comparisons with physical health, depression, and physical activity. Aging Ment. Health 21, 133–146 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2015.1081152
Bouma, H., Fozard, J.L., Bronswijk, J.E.M.H.V.: Gerontechnology as a field of endeavour. Gerontechnology 8, 68–75 (2009). https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.004.00
Kitazaki, M., Nicenboim, I., Giaccardi, E., Kuijer, L., Neven, L., Lopez, B.: Connected resources: a research through design approach to designing for older people’s resourcefulness. Presented at the Proceedings of the 4th Biennal Research Through Design Conference 2019 (2019). https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.7855868.V2
Perkins, D.D., Zimmerman, M.A.: Empowerment theory, research, and application. Am. J. Community Psychol. 23, 569–579 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506982
Giaccardi, E., Nicenboim, I.: Resourceful ageing: Empowering older people to age resourcefully with the Internet of Things. Newnorth Print, Bedfordshire (2018)
Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am. Psychol. 37, 122–147 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Eccola: Esteban Ortiz-Ospina and Max Roser (2020)—Loneliness and social connections. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/social-connections-and-loneliness
Norman, D.A.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (2005)
Cila, N., Smit, I., Giaccardi, E., Kröse, B.: Products as agents: metaphors for designing the products of the IoT age. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 448–459. ACM, Denver (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025797
Marenko, B.: Neo-animism and design: a new paradigm in object theory. Des. Cult. 6, 219–241 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2752/175470814X14031924627185
Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction. Academic Press, San Francisco (2002)
Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., Furlong, J., Madden, L.: Older adults’ use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing Soc. 23, 561–582 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X03001302
Sackmann, R., Winkler, O.: Technology generations revisited: The internet generation. Gerontechnology. 11, 493–503 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2013.11.4.002.00
Wang, G., Marradi, C., Albayrak, A., van der Cammen, T.J.M.: Co-designing with people with dementia: a scoping review of involving people with dementia in design research. Maturitas 127, 55–63 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.06.003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pollini, A., Giacobone, G.A., Zannoni, M. (2022). Aging and Interaction: Designing for Active Living Experiences. In: Scataglini, S., Imbesi, S., Marques, G. (eds) Internet of Things for Human-Centered Design. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1011. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8488-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8488-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-8487-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-8488-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)