Abstract
Controlling and managing project costs in infrastructure construction projects within budget is a matter of prime importance since these projects require a large amount of capital investment. The use of cost contingencies is found as an effective tool for reducing the cost overrun. Traditionally, the contingency is estimated using a fixed percentage of the estimated cost. Project costs’ sensitivity to risk factors impacting the cost is not considered in this method resulting in underestimated or overestimated values. Therefore, in this paper, an alternate methodology is presented for developing a risk-induced model to predict the cost contingency after identifying and quantifying the risks involved in the projects. To develop the model, a rule-based fuzzy inference system has been used. The fuzzy theory can deal with incomplete, imprecise and uncertain data intrinsic to complex construction projects. This methodology provides a practical approach for estimating cost contingency by considering the frequently occurring and important risk factors impacting the cost of construction projects. Details about the development and validation of the model are presented in this research study. Project managers and decision-makers will find this model very useful for making decisions regarding various issues related to the project such as contingency estimation, bid price calculation, mark-up estimation and assessment of different projects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baccarini D (2006) The maturing concept of estimating project cost contingency—a review. In: 31st Australasian University Building Educators Association Conference (AUBEA 2006), Curtis University of Technology, Australia
Baloi D, Price ADF (2003) Modeling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance. Int J Proj Manag 21(4):261–269
Barraza G, Bueno R (2007) Cost contingency management. J Constr Eng Manag 23(3):140–146
Barraza G (2011) Probabilistic estimation and allocation of project time contingency. J Constr Eng Manag 137(4):259–265
Boukendour S (2005) A new approach to project cost overrun and contingency management. In: OCRI partnership conferences series process and project management, 22 March 2005, Ottawa
Chen D, Hartman FT (2000) A neural network approach to risk assessment and contingency allocation. AACE international transactions. Risk.07.01- Risk.07.06 Contingencies. J Constr Eng Manag 126(2):130–136
Diekmann JE (1983) Probabilistic estimating: mathematics and applications. J Constr Eng Manag 109(3):297–308
Dikmen I, Birgonul MT, Han S (2007) Using fuzzy risk assessment to rate cost overrun risk in international construction project. Int J Project Manage 25:495–505
Ahiaga-Dagbui DD, Tokede O, Smith SD, Wamuziri S (2013) A neuro-fuzzy hybrid model for predicting final cost of water infrastructure projects. In: Conference: 29th ARCOM conference at: reading, UK, September 2013. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2382.6880
Elizabeth S, Sujatha L (2015) Project scheduling method using triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and triangular fuzzy numbers. Appl Math Sci 9(4):185–198
Esragh F, Mamdani EH (1981) A general approach to linguistic approximation, fuzzy reasoning, and its application. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
Ford DN (2002) Achieving multiple project objectives through contingency management. J Constr Eng Manage 128(1):30–39
Hassanein AAB, Cherlopalle V (1999) Fuzzy sets theory and range estimating. AACE International Transactions, K4111. Hassanein, 1999.pdf, AACE Int Trans, K4 (1)
Idrus A, Nuruddin MF, Rohman MA (2011) Development of project cost contingency estimation model using risk analysis and fuzzy expert system. Expert Syst Appl 38:1501–1508
Jin XH, Zhang G (2011) Modelling optimal risk allocation in PPP projects using artificial neural networks. Int J Proj Manag 29(5):591–603
Kutsch E, Hall M (2010) Deliberate ignorance in project risk management. Int J Proj Manag 28(3):245–255
Lorance RB, Wendling RV (2001) Basic techniques for analysing and presenting cost risk analysis. Cost Eng 43(6):25–31
Mak S, Picken D (2000) Using risk analysis to determine construction project. J Constr Eng Manag. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:2(130)
Mamdani EH (1997) Application of fuzzy logic to approximate reasoning using linguistic synthesis. IEEE Trans Comput 26(12):1182–1191
Mamdani H, Assillian S (1975) An experimental in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int J Man Mach Stud 7(1):1–13
Marco AD, Rafele C, Thaheem MJ (2015) Dynamic management of risk contingency in complex design-build projects. J Manage Eng. ISSN 0733–9364/04015080(10)
McGrew JF, Bilotta JG (2000) The effectiveness of risk management: measuring what didn’t happen. Manag Decis 38(4):293–301
Moselhi O (1997) Risk assessment and contingency estimation. AACE Int Trans 90–95
Paek J, Lee YW, Ock JH (1993) Pricing construction risk: fuzzy set application. J Constr Eng Manag 119(4):743–756
Project Management Institute (2013) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)
Shaheen A, Robinson FA, AbouRizk SM (2007) Fuzzy numbers in cost range estimating. J Constr Eng Manag 133(4):325–334
Sharma S, Goyal PK (2014) Cost overrun factors and project cost risk assessment in construction industry—a state of the art review. Int J Civil Eng 3(4):139–154
Sharma S, Goyal PK (2019) Fuzzy assessment of the risk factors causing cost overrun in construction industry. Evol Intel. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-019-00214-9
Sonmez R, Ergin A, Birgonul MT (2007) Quantitative methodology for determination of cost contingency in international projects. J Manag Eng 23(1):35–39
Thal AE, Cook JJ, White ED (2010) Estimation of cost contingency for air force construction projects. J Constr Eng Manage 136(11):1181–1188
Touran A (2003) Probabilistic model for cost contingency. J Constr Eng Manag 129(3):280–284
Wang WC, Bilozerov T, Dzeng RJ, Hsiao FY, Wang KC (2017) Conceptual cost estimations using neuro-fuzzy and multi-factor evaluation methods for building projects, pp 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.948908
Williams TP (2003) Predicting final cost for competitively bid construction projects using regression models. Int J Project Manage 21:593–599
Yeo KT (1990) Risks, classification of estimates and contingency management. J Manag Eng 6(4):458–470
Zadah LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest Statement
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Goyal, P.K., Sharma, S. (2022). Evaluating Cost Contingency for Construction Projects: A Fuzzy Risk Analysis Approach. In: Hu, YC., Tiwari, S., Trivedi, M.C., Mishra, K.K. (eds) Ambient Communications and Computer Systems. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 356. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7952-0_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7952-0_58
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7951-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7952-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)