Abstract
Radiologic examination is effective and useful to diagnose and evaluate small bowel involvement in Crohn’s disease. Three modalities—small bowel follow-through (SBFT); CT enterography, and MR enterography—are currently used in clinical practice. Although the sensitivity and specificity of SBFT are relatively lower than those of capsule endoscopy or CT enterography, it is still a useful method in cases of difficulty in evaluating fine mucosal changes, contraindicated capsule endoscopy, and high risk of intravenous contrast agents. CT enterography has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting small bowel involvement of Crohn’s disease and is also useful to diagnose obstructions, penetrating disease, and extraintestinal manifestations. MR enterography can be used to distinguish between active inflammation and stricture caused by fibrosis because of the excellent soft tissue contrast. Since there is no radiation risk, MR enterography can be useful as an imaging technique that complements the limitations of CT enterography. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of each method, the appropriate modality should be selected according to the patient’s situation and the purpose of the test.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Farmer RG, Hawk WA, Turnbull RB Jr. Clinical patterns in Crohn’s disease: a statistical study of 615 cases. Gastroenterology. 1975;68:627–35.
Bernstein CN, Boult IF, Greenberg HM, van der Putten W, Duffy G, Grahame GR. A prospective randomized comparison between small bowel enteroclysis and small bowel follow-through in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1997;113:390–8.
Solem CA, Loftus EV Jr, Fletcher JG, et al. Small-bowel imaging in Crohn’s disease: a prospective, blinded, 4-way comparison trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:255–66.
Raptopoulos V, Schwartz RK, McNicholas MM, Movson J, Pearlman J, Joffe N. Multiplanar helical CT enterography in patients with Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1545–50.
Qiu Y, Mao R, Chen BL, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: magnetic resonance enterography vs. computed tomography enterography for evaluating disease activity in small bowel Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;40:134–46.
Kambadakone AR, Prakash P, Hahn PF, Sahani DV. Low-dose CT examinations in Crohn’s disease: impact on image quality, diagnostic performance, and radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:78–88.
Lee SS, Kim AY, Yang SK, et al. Crohn disease of the small bowel: comparison of CT enterography, MR enterography, and small-bowel follow-through as diagnostic techniques. Radiology. 2009;251:751–61.
Jensen MD, Kjeldsen J, Rafaelsen SR, Nathan T. Diagnostic accuracies of MR enterography and CT enterography in symptomatic Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:1449–57.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kim, D.B., Lee, KM. (2022). Radiologic Examination: Small-Bowel Follow-Through, Computed Tomography Enterography, and Magnetic Resonance Enterography. In: Chun, H.J., Seol, SY., Choi, MG., Cho, J.Y. (eds) Small Intestine Disease. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7239-2_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7239-2_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7238-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7239-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)