Skip to main content

Electricity as a Field for Anthropological Theorising and Research

Electricity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of the Anthropology of Technology

Abstract

What is electricity? Is it a natural force, a technology, or an infrastructural system? Is electricity a flow of electrons or an electromagnetic effect? Is it a liberating power or a silent killer? Is it even a thing that can be grasped? However we describe it, analyse it, or imagine it, electricity has been a defining force of modernisation for over a century, and its political, economic, and technical tentacles demand holistic, historiographic, and ethnographic attention. This chapter tracks the elusive nature of electricity through a myriad of incarnations, to glimpse the material effects and theoretical challenges posed by electricity. It looks at the ways that electricity has been conceptualised, materialised, and instrumentalised, by reviewing its ability to connect and disconnect things, people, and places. The particular kinds of relations that electricity generates provoke new questions about the concepts of relationality that have been discussed in recent anthropological debates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The number of women taking electrical engineering degrees stubbornly remains far below those undertaking other kinds of engineering study.

  2. 2.

    See https://snl.no/Alta-saken and http://kultur.nve.no/utstillinger/kampen-om-alta. Accessed 27 October 2020.

  3. 3.

    http://lifeoffgrid.ca/off-grid-living-the-book/. Accessed 26 July 2019.

  4. 4.

    Electricians in the UK must have access to the annual edition of British Standard BS7671 Wiring Requirements for Electrical Installations, for which an annual subscription currently costs between £69 and £406 plus VAT: https://electrical.theiet.org/resources/digital/digital-packages/. Accessed 29 July 2019. See also HSE 2015.

  5. 5.

    It is fascinating to note that the switch was invented sometime after domestic lighting. At Cragside, said to be one of the first houses in the world—if not the first—to be electrified using hydroelectric power, in 1878, the table lamps pre-date toggle or button switches. www.nationaltrust.org.uk/cragside. Accessed 8 July 2021.

  6. 6.

    See https://www.ukpowernetworks.co.uk/losses/. Accessed 8 July 2021.

References

  • Bakke, G. (2019). Electricity is Not a Noun. In S. Abram, B. R. Winthereik, & T. Yarrow (Eds.), Electrifying Anthropology: Exploring electrical practices and infrastructures (pp. 25–41). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. E., Daggett, C., & Labuski, C. (2020). Toward feminist energy systems: Why adding women and solar panels is not enough. Energy Research & Social Science, 68, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101557.

  • Boardman, B. (1991). Fuel Poverty: From Cold Homes to Affordable Warmth. Pinter Pub Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouzarovski, S., & Petrova, S. (2015). A global perspective on domestic energy deprivation: Overcoming the energy poverty–fuel poverty binary. Energy Research & Social Science, 10, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, D. (2014). Energopower: An Introduction. Anthropological Quarterly, 87(2), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2014.0020

  • Boyer, D. (2015). Anthropology Electric. Cultural Anthropology, 30(4), 531–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. (2012). Radiating Knowledge: The Public Anthropology of Nuclear Energy. American Anthropologist, 114(1), 137–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, L. (2017). A Moral Technology: Electrification as Political Ritual in New Delhi. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, L. (2019). Widened Reason and Deepened Optimism: Electricity and morality in Durkheim’s anthropology and our own. In Electrifying Anthropology: Exploring electrical practices and infrastructures (pp. 43–64). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J. (2019). No current: electricity and disconnection in rural India. In S. Abram, B. R. Winthereik, & T. Yarrow (Eds.), Electrifying Anthropology: Exploring electrical practices and infrastructures (pp. 66–81). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. (1999). Expectations of modernity: myths and meanings of urban life on the Zambian copperbelt. Berkeley & London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folch, C. (2013). Surveillance and State Violence in Stroessner’s Paraguay: Itaipu Hydroelectric Dam, Archive of Terror. American Anthropologist, 116(1), 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forde, E. (2017). The ethics of energy provisioning: Living off-grid in rural Wales. Energy Research & Social Science, 30, 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forde, E. (2020). Living Off Grid in Wales: Eco-villages in policy and practice. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, S., & Woolard, K. A. (2001). Languages and publics: the making of authority. Manchester: St. Jerome Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, M., & Min, B. (2012). Theft and Loss of Electricity in an Indian State. International Growth Centre working paper 12/0060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooday, G. (2004). The Morals of Measurement: Accuracy, Irony and Trust in Late Victorian Electrical Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison Moore, A. (2020). Switching from the Master to the Mistress: A Women’s Guide to Powering Up the Home. In A. Harrison Moore & R. Sandwell (Eds.), “Women and Energy”, RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society, 1, 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodbod, J., Stevenson, E. G. J., Akall, G., et al. (2019). Social-ecological change in the Omo-Turkana basin: A synthesis of current developments. Ambio, 48(10), 1099–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C., & Boyer, D. (2015). Aeolian Politics. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2015.1022564.

  • Hughes, T. P. (1983). Networks of Power: Electrification of Western Society, 1880–1930. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSE (Health and Safety Executive). (2015). The Electricity at Work Regulations 1989. © Crown copyright 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, W. (2010). The ‘Dingpolitik’ of Wind Energy in Northern German Landscapes: An Ethnographic Case Study, Landscape Research, 35(2), 195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2002). Morality and Technology, The End of the Means (trans: Venn, C.) Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5/6), 247–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, M. (2017). Decolonizing energy: Black Lives Matter and technoscientific expertise amid solar transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 30, 18–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienthal, D. E. (1944). TVA: Democracy on the March. New York City: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd Thomas, K. (2017). The Architect as Shopper. In H. Frichot, C. Gabrielsson, & H. Runting (Eds.), Architecture and Feminisms (pp. 54–65). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader, L. (1981). Barriers to thinking about Energy. Physics Today, 34(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader, L., & Beckerman, S. (1978). Energy as it Relates to the Quality and Style of Life. Ann. Rev. Energy, 3, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader, L., & Milleron, N. (1979). Dimensions of the “people problem” in Energy research and the factual basis of dispersed energy futures. Energy, 4(5), pp. 953–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, D. E. (1990). Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology, 1880–1940. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, D. E. (1997). Consuming Power: A Social History of American Energies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, E., Angelini, A., & DeVore, J. (2017, December 19). Our Electric Exchanges. Theorizing the Contemporary, Fieldsights. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/our-electric-exchanges.

  • Ortar, N. (2021). Power Legacies at the Core of Everyday Life: The case of wood-burning stoves in France. In T. Loloum, S. Abram, & N. Ortar (Eds.), Ethnographies of Power: A political anthropology of energy. Oxford & New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özden-Schilling, C. (2015). Economy Electric. Cultural Anthropology, 30(4), 578–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, S. (2019). A “Weapon of the Weak”: Electric Boycotts in the Arab Levant and the Global Contours of Interwar Anti-Imperialism. Radical History Review, 134, 116–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful. A study of economics as if people mattered. London: Blond and Briggs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the Grass Roots; A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvast, A., & Virtanen, M. J. (2014). Keeping Systems at Work: Electricity Infrastructure from Control Rooms to Household Practices. Science & Technology Studies, 27(2), 93–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, P. (1994). Embodying Colonial Memories. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 634–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strengers, Y. (2014). Smart energy in everyday life: are you designing for resource man? Interactions, 21(4), 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strengers, Y., Nicholls, L., & Maller, C. (2014). Curious energy consumers: Humans and nonhumans in assemblages of household practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(3), 761–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerton, J. (2004). Do Electrons Have Politics? Constructing User Identities in Swedish Electricity. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(4), 486–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurman, S. (Ed.) (1983). A history of the Tennessee Valley Authority. Tennessee Valley Authority Information Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannini, P., & Taggart, J. (2014). Off the Grid: Re-Assembling Domestic Life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G., & Day, R. (2012). Fuel poverty as injustice: Integrating distribution, recognition and procedure in the struggle for affordable warmth. Energy Policy, 49, 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite, H., Nakagami, H., Masuda, T., & Yamaga, Y. (1996). A cross-cultural analysis of household energy use behaviour in Japan and Norway. Energy Policy, 24(9), 795–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winther, T. (2008). The Impact of Electricity: Development, desires and dilemmas. New York & Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winther, T. (2012). Electricity Theft as a Relational Issue: A Comparative Look at Zanzibar, Tanzania, and the Sunderban Islands, India. Energy for Sustainable Development, 16(1), 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winther, T., & Bell, S. (2018). Domesticating In Home Displays in Selected British and Norwegian Households. Science & Technology Studies, 31(2), 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the editors and the anonymous reviewers for enormously helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Abram .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abram, S. (2022). Electricity as a Field for Anthropological Theorising and Research. In: Bruun, M.H., et al. The Palgrave Handbook of the Anthropology of Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7083-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7084-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics