Skip to main content

The Anthropology of Technology: The Formation of a Field

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of the Anthropology of Technology

Abstract

Anthropos and techne are inseparable when it comes to the study of humans and their societies. From its very origins as a discipline, anthropology has recorded and researched human-technology interfaces in efforts to account for and understand forms of social organisation and practice as well as systems of belief and meaning throughout the world. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the gradual formation of ‘anthropology of technology’ as a field of enquiry, from early evolutionary studies of technology via critiques of it by those who championed diffusionist understandings, to Maussian approaches to techniques as material actions, technology as skilled practice, and more contemporary understandings of technologies in terms of socio-technical systems and infrastructures. It is exactly such a multiplicity of approaches that has contributed to the thriving anthropologies of technology that make up this field of enquiry, allowing for analytical and methodological scaling on the part of the ethnographer, who can choose to focus on embodied skills, on practices/material actions, or on larger socio-technical systems which, together, make up technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Indeed, Mauss makes a case that ‘technology’ should be formalised into the science of techniques: ‘Technology is to technics what every other science is or would be to its objects, what linguistics is to language, for instance, or ethology to behaviour’ (Sigaut 1994, p. 422).The question of whether we understand technology as the study of techniques (as biology is the study of organisms) or as an operative system built into the machinery of production (as we sometimes talk of the ‘biology’ of the body) has been hugely influential for the divergent ways in which the anthropologies of technology have developed, for example, in Francophone and Anglophone countries, and it also lies behind many misunderstandings (Ingold, personal communication; cf. Canguilhem 2009).

  2. 2.

    Disputes between evolutionism and diffusionism partly continued within anthropology, for example through Julian Steward’s (1955) cultural ecology as the study of human adaptation to the environment and Leslie White’s (1959) neo-evolutionary studies of technology, even though they were gradually marginalised from mainstream socio-cultural anthropology.

  3. 3.

    An interesting debate about questions of technology’s materiality (or not) was set in motion following a book symposium on Lemonnier’s Mundane Objects: Materiality and Non-Verbal Communication (Latour 2014; Lemonnier 2014; Ingold 2014).

References

  • Abidin, C., & Seta, G. d. (2020). Private messages from the field: Confessions on digital ethnography and its discomforts. Journal of Digital Social Research, 2(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abram, S., Winthereik, B. R., & Yarrow, T. (Eds.) (2019). Electrifying anthropology: Exploring Electrical practices and infrastructures. London: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akrich, M. (1992). The De-scription of Technical Objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Societies (pp. 205–224). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (Ed.) (1986). The social life of things. Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7(2–3), 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, N., Gupta, A., & Appel, H. (Eds.) (2018). The promise of infrastructure. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, W. (2006). Colonial pathologies: American tropical medicine, race, and hygiene in the Philippines. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audouze, F. (2002). Leroi-Gourhan, a philosopher of technique and evolution. Journal of Archaeological Research, 10(4), 277–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, R. (2016). Catching our breath: Critical race STS and the carceral imagination. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2, 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A. (2016). Conceptions: Infertility and procreative technologies in India. Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs. Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (Eds.) (1987). The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (Eds.) (1992). Shaping Technology/Building Societies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg, J., & Karasti, H. (2013). Ethnography: positioning Ethnography within Participatory Design. In J. Simonsen & T. Robertsen (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design (pp. 86–116). New York & London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenbach, J. F. (1865). On the Natural Variety of Mankind. In The Anthropological Treatises of Blumenbach. London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts & Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, F. (1921). The Mind of Primitive Man. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, F. (Ed.) (1938). General Anthropology. Washington, DC: D.C. Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B. A., Pearce, C., & Taylor, T. L. (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds: a handbook of method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1965). The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of agrarian change under population pressure. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, F. (2007). Gender and Technology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, S. D., Enggaard, T. R., Blok, A., Gårdhus, T., & Pedersen, M. A. (2020). How We Tweet About Coronavirus, and Why: A Computational Anthropological Mapping of Political Attention on Danish Twitter during the COVID-19 Pandemic. http://somatosphere.net/forumpost/covid19-danish-twitter-computational-map/. Accessed 21 June 2021.

  • Bubandt, N., & Otto, T. (2010). Anthropology and the Predicaments of Holism. In T. Otto & N. Bubandt (Eds.), Experiments in Holism. Theory and Practice in Contemporary Anthropology (pp. 1–15). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, J. (2012). Invisible users: youth in the Internet cafes of urban Ghana. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canguilhem, G. 2009. Knowledge of Life. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1986). Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. J. (2011). Design anthropology: object culture in the 21st century. Wien: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, E. G. (2010). Ethnographic Approaches to Digital Media. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 487–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, E. G. (2013). Coding freedom: the ethics and aesthetics of hacking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, G. (2014). Hacker, hoaxer, whistleblower, spy: the many faces of anonymous. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, S. J. (2005). Budgets and Biopolitics. In Global Assemblages. Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems (pp. 373–390). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, S. J., & Ong, A. (2005). Global Assemblages, Anthropological Problems. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global Assemblages. Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. G., Durington, M., & Gill, H. (2017). Multimodality: An Invitation. American Anthropologist, 119(1), 142–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsín Jiménez, A., & Estalella, A. (2016). Ethnography: A Prototype. Ethnos, 82(5), 846–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2015.1133688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousineau, L. S., Oakes, H., & Johnson, C. W. (2019). Appnography: Modifying ethnography for app-based culture. In D.C. Parry, C.W. Johnson, & S. Fullagar (Eds.), Digital Dilemmas: Transforming gender identities and power relations in everyday life (pp. 95–117). Basingstoke: Palgrave Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. S. (1983). More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laet, M., & Mol, A. (2000). The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology. Social Studies of Science, 30(2), 225–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Cadena, M. (2015). Earth beings: ecologies of practice across Andean worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijck, J. v., Poell, T., & Waal, M. d. (2018). The platform society. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (1979). The world of goods: towards an anthropology of consumption. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas-Jones, R. (2021). Drawing as Analysis: Thinking in Images, Writing in Words. In A. Ballestero & B. R. Winthereik (Eds.), Experimenting with Ethnography. A Companion to Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas-Jones, R., Walford, A., & Seaver, N. (2021). Introduction: Towards an anthropology of data. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 27(S1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.13477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, G. L., & Dumit, J. (1997a). Locating and Intervening. An introduction. In G. L. Downey & J. Dumit (Eds.), Cyborgs & citadels: anthropological interventions in emerging sciences and technologies (pp. 5–29). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, G. L., & Dumit, J. (Eds.) (1997b). Cyborgs & citadels: anthropological interventions in emerging sciences and technologies. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. (1995). Heidegger on Gaining a Free Relation to Technology. In A. Feenburg & A. Hannay (Eds.), Technology and the Politics of Knowledge (pp. 25–33). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1994). Welcome to Cyberia: Notes on the Anthropology of Cyberculture. Current Anthropology, 35(3), 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1995a). Anthropology and the future: New technologies and the reinvention of culture. Futures, 27(4), 409–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1995b). Encountering Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse. Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estalella, A., & Criado, T. S. (Eds.) (2018). Experimental Collaborations. Ethnography through Fieldwork Devices. Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethnological Society of London (1848). Journal of the Ethnological Society of London, Vol. 1. Edinburgh: Neill and Company, Printers, Old Fishmarket.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faubion, J. D., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.) (2009). Fieldwork is not what it used to be: learning anthropology’s method in a time of transition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fei, X. (1992[1947]). From the Soil: The foundations of Chinese society (trans: Hamilton, G., & Zheng, W.). Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. (1990). The anti-politics machine: “development”, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho (8. printing. ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firmin, J. A. (2000[1885]). The Equality of the Human Races. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, D., & Callard, F. (2015). Rethinking interdisciplinarity across the social sciences and neurosciences. Springer Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluehr-Lobban, C. (2000). Anténor Firmin: Haitian pioneer of anthropology. American Anthropologist, 102(3), 449–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortun, K., Fortun, M., Bigras, E., Saheb, T., Costelloe-Kuehn, B., Crowder, J., et al. (2014). Experimental Ethnography Online: The asthma files. Cultural studies, 28(4), 632–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990[1976]). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S. (1997). Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frickel, S., Albert, M., & Prainsack, B. (Eds.) (2016). Investigating Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Theory and Practice across Disciplines. New Brunswick, New Jersey & London: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimura, J. H. (1996). Crafting science: a sociohistory of the quest for the genetics of cancer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullwiley, D. (2008). The Biologistical Construction of Race: ‘Admixture’ Technology and the New Genetic Medicine. Social Studies of Science, 38(5), 695–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatt, C., & Ingold, T. (2013). From Description to Correspondence: Anthropology in Real Time. In W. Gunn, T. Otto, & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Design Anthropology. Theory and Practice. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geismar, H., & Knox, H. (Eds.) (2021). Digital Anthropology (2nd edition). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (1988). Technology and Magic. Anthropology Today, 4(2), 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (1992). The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology. In J. Coote & A. Shelton (Eds.), Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, K. R., & Ingold, T. (Eds.) (1993). Tools, language and cognition in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godelier, M. (1975). Modes of production, kinship, and demographic structures. In M. Bloch (Ed.), Marxist Analyses and Social Anthropology (pp. 3–27). London: Malaby Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godelier, M. (1986[1982]). The making of great men: male domination and power among the New Guinea Baruya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godelier, M., & Garanger, J. (1979). Stone tools and steel tools among the Baruya of New Guinea. Some ethnographic and quantitative data. Social Science Information, 18(4–5), 633–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (1971). Technology, tradition, and the state in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafner, K., & Lyon, M. (1996). Where wizards stay up late: the origins of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannerz, U. (1996). Transnational Connections: Cultures, People, Places. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (1997). ModestW̲itness@SecondM̲illennium.FemaleManM̲eetsO̲ncoMouse: feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1979). Cultural materialism: the struggle for a science of culture. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P. (1997). Introduction: Technology as Skilled Practice: approaches from Anthropology, History and Psychology. Social Analysis, 41(1), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P., Jensen, C. B., & Morita, A. (Eds.) (2017). Infrastructures and social complexity: a companion. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastrup, K. (2018). Collaborative Moments. Expanding the Anthropological Field through Cross-Disciplinary Practice. Ethnos, 83(2), 316–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2016.1270343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1973[1927]). Being and time. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977[1953]). The question concerning technology (trans: Lovitt, W.). In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (pp. 3–35). New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (2010). Material-Cultural Turn. Event and Effect. In D. Hicks & M. C. Beaudry (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, M. (2017). Programmed inequality: how Britain discarded women technologists and lost its edge in computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1982). Symbols in action: ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeyer, K. (2019). Data as promise: Reconfiguring Danish public health through personalized medicine. Social studies of science, 49(4), 531–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornborg, A. (2019). Nature, Society, and Justice in the Anthropocene: Un-raveling the Money-Energy-Technology Complex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornborg, A. (2021). Objects Don’t Have Desires: Toward an Anthropology of Technology beyond Anthropomorphism. American Anthropologist, n/a(n/a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, H. A. (2006). The blessings and burdens of communication: cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields. Global Networks, 6(2), 143–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, H. A., & Miller, D. (Eds.) (2012). Digital anthropology. London: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. P. (1983). Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. London: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. P. (1987). The Evolution of Large Technological Systems. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (pp. 51–82). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, C. (2009). The Mask and the Face: Imagination and Social Life in Russian Chat Rooms and Beyond. Ethnos, 74(1), 31––50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (1997). Eight Themes in the Anthropology of Technology. Social Analysis, 41(1), 106–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000). Society, nature and the concept of technology. In T. Ingold (Ed.), The Perception of the Environment (pp. 312–322). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2001). Beyond Art and Technology: The Anthropology of Skill. In M. B. Schiffer (Ed.), Anthropological Perspectives on Technology (pp. 17–31). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2014). Resonators uncased. Mundane objects or bundles of affect? HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 517–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M. (1995). The local and the global: The anthropology of globalization and transnationalism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), 547–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelty, C. M. (2008). Two Bits. The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr, K. D. (1977). Producing and reproducing knowledge: descriptive or constructive? Toward a model of research production. Social Science Information, 16(6), 669–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, H., & Nafus, D. (Eds.) (2018). Ethnography for a data-world. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, B. (2013). The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, 327–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, L. E. (2005). Collaborative Ethnography and Public Anthropology. Current Anthropology, 46(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1086/425658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2014). Technical does not mean material. Hau, 4(1), 507–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Lemonnier, P. (Eds.) (1994). De la préhistoire aux missiles balistiques: L’intelligence sociale des techniques. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemonnier, P. (1986). The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 5(2), 147–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(86)90012-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemonnier, P. (1992). Elements for an Anthropology of Technology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemonnier, P. (Ed.) (1993). Technological Choices: Transformation in Material Cultures since the Neolithic. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemonnier, P. (2012). Mundane objects: materiality and non-verbal communication. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemonnier, P. (2014). The blending power of things. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 537–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1943). Evolution et Techniques I—L’Homme et la Matière, Paris: Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1945). Evolution et Techniques II—Milieu et Techniques, Paris: Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1993[1964]). Gesture and Speech. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindee, M. S., Goodman, A. H., & Heath, D. (2003). Anthropology in the Age of Genetics. Practice, Discourse, and Critique. In A. H. Goodman, D. Heath, & M. S. Lindee (Eds.), Genetic Nature/Culture: Anthropology and Science Beyond the Two Culture Divide (pp. 1–19). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubbock, J. (1875). The Origin of Civilisation and the Primitive Condition of Man. London: Longmans, Green & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (Ed.) (2020). Doing fieldwork in a pandemic (crowd-sourced document). Available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZCl8/edit?ts=5e88ae0a#. Accessed 21 June 2021.

  • MacKenzie, D. A., & Wajcman, J. (1985). The social shaping of technology: how the refrigerator got its hum. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magloire-Danton, G. (2005). Anténor Firmin and Jean Price-Mars: Revolution, Memory, Humanism. Small Axe, 9(2), 150–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E. (Ed.) (1995a). Technoscientific Imaginaries. Conversations, Profiles, and Memoirs. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E. (1995b). Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. (2000). Para-Sites: A Casebook against Cynical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: an experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (1994). Flexible bodies: Tracking immunity in American culture from the days of polio to the age of AIDS. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1902). L’enseignement de I’histoire des religions des peuples non-civilisés à l’école des hautes études. Revue de l’histoire des religions, 45, 36–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1903). Esquisse d’une théorie générale de la magie (with H. Hubert). Année sociologique, 7, 1–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (2006[1941/1948]). Techniques and Technology. In N. Schlanger (Ed.), Techniques, technology and civilization (pp. 147–153). New York & Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (2007[1935]). Techniques of the body. In M. Lock & J. Farquhar (Eds.), Beyond the Body Proper. Reading the Anthropology of Material Life (pp. 50–68). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002[1945]). The Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messeri, L. (2021). Realities of illusion: tracing an anthropology of the unreal from Torres Strait to virtual reality. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, (n/a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1987). Material culture and mass consumption. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (Ed.) (1997). Material cultures. Why some things matter. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1998). A Theory of Shopping. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2005). Materiality: An introduction. In D. Miller (Ed.), Materiality. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2006). Consumption. In C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. Küchler, M. Rowlands, & P. Spyer (Eds.), Handbook of Material Culture (pp. 341–354). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Tilley, C. (1996). Editorial. Journal of Material Culture, 1(1), 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L. H. (1877). Ancient Society or Researches in the Lines of Human Progress From Savagery, Through Barbarism to Civilization. New York: Henry Holt and Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple. Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morita, A. (2013). Traveling engineers, machines, and comparisons: intersecting imaginations and journeys in the Thai Local Engineering Industry. East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 7(2), 221–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: technology, solutionism, and the urge to fix problems that don’t exist. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. M., & Wilf, E. Y. (Eds.) (2021). Designs and Anthropologies. Frictions and Affinities. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. A. (2009). My Life as a Night Elf Priest. An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, V.-K. (2005). Antiretroviral Globalism, Biopolitics, and Therapeutic Citizenship. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global Assemblages (pp. 124–144). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nova, N., & Bloch, A. (2020). Dr. Smartphones: an ethnography of mobile phone repair shops. Morges: IDPURE éditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A., & Collier, S. J. (Eds.) (2005). Global assemblages: technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pálsson, G. (2007). Anthropology and the new genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pels, P. (2010). Magical Things: On Fetishes, Commodities, and Computers. In D. Hicks & M. C. Beaudry (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffenberger, B. (1988). Fetishised Objects and Humanised Nature: Towards an Anthropology of Technology. Man, 23(2), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/2802804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffenberger, B. (1992a). Social Anthropology of Technology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 491–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffenberger, B. (1992b). Technological Dramas. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17(3), 282–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (Eds.) (2015). Digital Ethnography. Principle and Practice. Los Angeles & London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prainsack, B., Svendsen, M. N., Koch, L., & Ehrich, K. (2010). How do we collaborate? Social science researchers’ experience of multidisciplinarity in biomedical settings. BioSocieties, 5(2), 278–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, G. (1999). Another reason: Science and the imagination of modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. (1996). Making PCR: a story of biotechnology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R. (1999). Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratzel, J. (1896) The History of Mankind. 3 Volumes. London: Macmillan & Co., Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, W.H.R. (1914). The History of Melanesian Society, Vol. 2. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N., & Novas, C. (2005). Biological Citizenship. In S. J. Collier & A. Ong (Eds.), Global Assemblages. Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems (pp. 439–463). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone Age Economics. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, J. F., Pink, S., Irving, A., & Sjöberg, J. (Eds.) (2017). Anthropologies and Futures. Researching Emerging and Uncertain Worlds. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (Ed.) (2001). Anthropological Perspectives on Technology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlanger, N. (2006). Introduction. Technological Commitments: Marcel Mauss and the Study of Techniques in the French Social Sciences. In M. Mauss (Ed.), Techniques, technology and civilization, edited and introduced by Nathan Schlanger. New York & Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaver, N. (2017). Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717738104.

  • Seaver, N. (2018). What Should an Anthropology of Algorithms Do? Cultural Anthropology, 33(3), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca33.3.04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, L. (1968[1952]). Steel Axes for Stone-Age Australians. In Y. A. Cohen (Ed.), Man in Adaption. The Cultural Present. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigaut, F. (1994). Technology. In T. Ingold (Ed.), Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology (pp. 420–459). London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. C., Vangkilde, K. T., Kjærsgaard, M. G., Otto, T., Halse, J., & Binder, T. (Eds.) (2016). Design anthropological futures. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, D., Holbraad, M., & Pedersen, M. A. (2009). Technologies of the Imagination: An Introduction. Ethnos, 74(1), 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 5–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrianakis, A. (2015). From anthropologist to actant (and back to anthropology): Position, Impasse, and Observation in Sociotechnical Collaboration. Cultural Anthropology, 30(1), 169–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, J. H. (1955). Theory of culture change: the methodology of multilinear evolution. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TallBear, K. (2013). Native American DNA: tribal belonging and the false promise of genetic science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: the world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. (2000). The Global Situation. Cultural Anthropology, 15(3), 327–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. L. (2005). Friction. An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, E. (1901). Pitt-Rivers. In L. Stephen (Ed.), Dictionary of national biography, Vol. 3. London: Smith, Elder, & co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. W. (1974). Dramas, Fields and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (2000). Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: What State is the Art? Social Studies of Science, 30(3), 447–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltorp, K. (2021). Multimodal Sorting: The Flow of Images across Social Media and Anthropological Analysis. In A. Ballestero & B. R. Winthereik (Eds.), Experimenting with Ethnography. A Companion to Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltorp, K., & Bruun, M. H. (forthcoming). Flying Drones and the Flow of Images: A Gendered Issue of Concern. In D. Lanzeni, K. Waltorp, S. Pink, & R. C. Smith (Eds.), An Anthropology of Futures and Technologies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P. (2012, August 12). Writing Live Fieldnotes: Towards a More Open Ethnography. Ethnography Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. A. (1959). The evolution of culture: the development of civilization to the fall of Rome. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittfogel, K. A. (1957). Oriental despotism a comparative study of total power. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. (2001). Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture, 10(4), 445–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åsberg, C., & Lykke, N. (2010). Feminist technoscience studies. European Journal of Women’s Studies 17(4): 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Tim Ingold, Pierre Lemonnier, and Daniel Miller for their insightful comments both on the history and on the substance of the anthropology of technology; their suggestions have been invaluable. We would also like to thank Palgrave Macmillan’s anonymous reviewers of the Handbook in general and our Introduction specifically for excellent feedback and comments that have considerably improved our chapter. And finally we would like to thank Rachel Douglas-Jones, Klaus Hoeyer, and the team of Handbook co-editors for their careful reading and their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maja Hojer Bruun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bruun, M.H., Wahlberg, A. (2022). The Anthropology of Technology: The Formation of a Field. In: Bruun, M.H., et al. The Palgrave Handbook of the Anthropology of Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7083-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7084-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics