Skip to main content

Study on Cost Modeling and Economical Design of Superstructure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Construction Materials and Sustainable Environment

Abstract

Due to the escalation of the prize of construction materials, Engineers are forced to reduce the construction cost in buildings by adopting various techniques. In this project, an attempt is made to reduce the cost of the buildings in the super structures, since 70% of the cost of the building has been spent on it. A comparison of detailed estimate for steel as well as concrete has been made. To make the building economical and structurally efficient, the traditional method of load-bearing walls has been avoided by adopting steel framed structure, since the cost of a reinforced concrete-framed structures is high because of the use of cement, sand, and aggregates. Most of the loads are not fully carried by concrete, and hence, the members are not efficient. For this reason, steel super structure is considered here. The optimization on the structural components has been done by adopting techniques like bracings, lightweight floor slabs, roof slabs, and partition walls which are analyzed and designed in ETABS. Generally, the bracings are the structural component that converts lateral load into axial force. Therefore, the moment on the structure has been reduced, and hence, the stability can be improved. As steel structures are prefabricated the assemblies of these systems require less time and environmental factors can also be avoided. The structure can be completed within the stipulated time based on the requirements of the client. Hence, the construction time can be reduced in addition to reduction in the cost of the building. The economical alternative among steel and reinforced concrete building can be analyzed by doing the cost estimation of the building.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones, A., Stegemann, J., & Sykes, J. P. (2016). Winslow, adoption of unconventional approaches in construction: The case of cross-laminated timber. Construction and Building Materials, 125, 690–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. European Commission. (2019). Final towards a circular economy: A zero waste programme for Europe COM 398 Final, 2014 (pp. 398). Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2014/EN/1-2014-398-EN-F1-1.Pdf. Accessed February 25, 2019.

  3. Mohammadi, J., & Ling, L. (2017). Can wood become an alternative material for tall building construction. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmed, S., & Arocho, I. (2021). Analysis of cost comparison and effects of change orders during construction: Study of a mass timber and a concrete building project. Journal of Building Engineering, 33, 101856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101856

  5. Gagandeep. (2020). Time and cost comparison of reinforced cement concrete and steel structure. Materials Today: Proceedings. ISSN: 2214-7853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.672

  6. John, S., & Buchanan, A. (2012). Cost and construction time for a 3-story post tensioned timber building compared with concrete and steel building. In Proceedings of the 2012 World Conference on Timber Engineering. Auckland, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bockholta, M. T., Kristensen, J. H., Colli, M., Jensen, & Wæhrens, B. V. (2020). Exploring factors affecting the financial performance of end-of-life take-back program in a discrete manufacturing context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120916

  8. Zaveri, B. H., Gadhiya, J. A., & Dhameliya, H. K. (2016). A review on the comparative study of steel, RCC and composite building. International Journal of Innovative Science Engineering and Technology, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jirage, M., Sayagavi, V. G., & Gore, N. G. (2012). Comparative study of RCC and composite multi-storeyed building. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering (IJSEAS), 1(6). ISSN: 2395-3470.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krishna Raju, N. (2006). Reinforced concrete design. New Age International Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Punmia, B. C. RCC designs. Laxmi Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dutta, B. N. (2002). Estimating and costing in civil engineering (25th ed.). UBS Publishers and Distributors Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chakraborti, M. (2006). Estimation, costing, specific and valuation in civil engineering (Kolkata ed.). M. Chakraborti Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, M., Luo, D., & Hu, Z. (2020). Seismic performance of steel-enhanced damping concrete core walls with concealed steel plate bracings. Engineering Structures, 213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110564

  15. Nassani, D. E., Hussein, A. K., & Mohammed, A. H. (2017). Comparative response assessment of steel frames with different bracing systems under seismic effect. Structures, 11, 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2017.06.006

  16. Safarizki, H. A., Kristiawan, S. A., & Basuki, A. (2013). Evaluation of the use of steel bracing to improve seismic performance of reinforced concrete building. Procedia Engineering, 54, 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.040

  17. Bhat, K. A., & Danish, P. (2021). Analyzing different configurations of variable angle diagrid structures. Materials Today: Proceedings, 42(2), 821–826. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214785320389902

  18. IS 456. (2000). Indian Standard Code of practice for plain) and reinforced concrete (4th rev.). Bureau of Indian Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  19. IS 800. (2007). Code of practice for general construction in steel. Bureau of Indian Standard.

    Google Scholar 

  20. IS 808. Dimensions for hot rolled steel beam, column, channel and angle sections. Bureau of Indian standards.

    Google Scholar 

  21. IS 875 (Part 1). (1987). Code of practice for design loads for buildings and structures, dead loads. Bureau of Indian Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  22. IS 875 (Part 2). (1987). Code of practice for design loads for buildings and structures, live loads. Bureau of Indian Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  23. IS 1893 (Part 1). (2002). Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors feel highly indebted to the Chancellor of Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, for the services provided to carry out the experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Danish, P., Bhat, K.A., Ganesh, S., Anita Jessie, J. (2022). Study on Cost Modeling and Economical Design of Superstructure. In: Gupta, A.K., Shukla, S.K., Azamathulla, H. (eds) Advances in Construction Materials and Sustainable Environment. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 196. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6557-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6557-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6556-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6557-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics