Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 237))

Abstract

Automated inspection systems are gaining importance for quick inspection and maintenance purpose for large volume of data in welding fields. Welding is very complex process and during the process defects may arise in weld zone. Identifying those defects requires skill and is impractical for large volume of data. This paper focuses to solve the problem by implementing deep learning model which is part of industrial 4.0 revolution, to classify seven common defects and locate them automatically for ‘v’ butt joint weld of 12 mm plate thickness for 19 angles from 2 groups by using ‘A’ scan signal of non-destructive testing method, phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT). For feature extraction, discrete wavelet transform (DWT) is used with selection of proper mother wavelet. For supervised training, two architectures namely feed forward neural network (FFNN), convolutional neural network (CNN) are used. FFNN used features from DWT and for CNN we used both features and whole signal for training. Finally we discussed about implementation details for different models. It is observed that due to distribution of training data all the models achieves about 80% accuracy but for simple applications FFNN can give satisfactory results but if output is complex then CNN should be implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gholizadeha S (2016) A review of non-destructive testing methods of composite materials. Procedia Struct Integr 1:50–57

    Google Scholar 

  2. Suh DM, Kim WW (1995) A new ultrasonic technique for detection and sizing of small cracks in studs and bolts. J Nondestruct Eval 14(4)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li B, Shen Y, Hu W (2011) The study on defects in aluminum 2219-T6 thick butt friction stir welds with the application of multiple non-destructive testing methods. Mater Des 32(4):2073–2084

    Google Scholar 

  4. Taheri H, Hassen AA (2019) Nondestructive ultrasonic inspection of composite materials: a comparative advantage of phased array ultrasonic. Appl Sci 9(8)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singh A, Thakur N, Sharma A (2016) A review of supervised machine learning algorithms. In: 2016 3rd international conference on computing for sustainable global development (INDIACom), New Delhi, pp 1310–1315

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shrestha A, Mahmood A (2019) Review of deep learning algorithms and architectures. IEEE Access 7:53040–53065

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rumelhart D, Hinton G, Williams R (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323:533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G (2012) ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of advances in neural information processing systems, vol 25, no 2, pp 1090–1098

    Google Scholar 

  9. Simonea G, Morabitoa FC, Polikarb R, Ramuhallib P, Udpab L, Udpab S (2002) Feature extraction techniques for ultrasonic signal classification. Int J Appl Electromagnet Mech 15(1–4):291–294.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mallat S (1989) A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Pattern Anal Mach Intell 11:674–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Akram NA, Isa D, Rajkumar R, Lee LH (2014) Active incremental support vector machine for oil and gas pipeline defects prediction system using long range ultrasonic transducers. Ultrasonics 54(6):1534–1544

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee LH, Rajkumar R, Lo LH, Wan CH, Isa D (2013) Oil and gas pipeline failure prediction system using long range ultrasonic transducers and Euclidean-support vector machines classification approach. Exp Syst Appl 40(6):1925–1934

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jahankhani P, Kodogiannis V, Revett K (2006) EEG signal classification using wavelet feature extraction and neural networks. In: IEEE John Vincent Atanasoff JVA international symposium on modem computing. IEEE, Sofia, pp 120–124

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kesharaju M, Nagarajah R (2015) Feature selection for neural network based defect classification of ceramic components using high frequency ultrasound. Ultrasonics 62:271–277

    Google Scholar 

  15. Halil Ibrahim Erdal AN, Onur Karakurt B, Namli E (2013) High performance concrete compressive strength forecasting using ensemble models based on discrete wavelet transform. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26(4):1246–1254

    Google Scholar 

  16. Iyer S, Sinha SK, Tittmann BR, Pedrick MK (2012) Ultrasonic signal processing methods for detection of defects in concrete pipes. Autom Constr 22:135–148

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hou W, Wei Y, Jin Y, Zhu C (2019) Deep features based on a DCNN model for classifying imbalanced weld flaw types. Measurement 131

    Google Scholar 

  18. Meng M, Chua YJ, Wouterson E, Ong CPK (2017) Ultrasonic signal classification and imaging system for composite materials via deep convolutional neural networks. Neurocomputing 257:128–135

    Google Scholar 

  19. He H, Tan Y, Wang Y (2015) Optimal base wavelet selection for ECG noise reduction using a comprehensive entropy criterion. Entropy 17(9):6093–6109.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lazaro JC, San Emeterio JL, Ramos A, Fernandez-Marrona JL (2002) Influence of thresholding procedures in ultrasonic grain noise reduction using wavelets. Ultrasonics 40(1–8):263–267.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stepinski T, Lingvall F (2000) Automatic defect characterization in ultrasonic NDT. In: 15th WCNDT, conference proceedings, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ali MGS, Elsayed NZ, Eid AM (2012) Investigation of ultrasonic calibration using steel standard reference blocks. Walailak J Sci Technol (WJST) 9(4):417–424

    Google Scholar 

  23. Safari A, Zhang J, Velichko A, Drinkwater BW (2017) Assessment methodology for defect characterization using ultrasonic arrays. NDT and E Int 94:126–136

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pawar, P., Buktar, R. (2022). Detection and Classification of Defects in Ultrasonic Testing Using Deep Learning. In: Gunjan, V.K., Zurada, J.M. (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Recent Trends in Machine Learning, IoT, Smart Cities and Applications. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 237. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6407-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics