Skip to main content

Evaluation of Student’s Notes in a Blended Learning Course

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Note Taking Activities in E-Learning Environments

Abstract

Student’s notes are evaluated to trace their learning process in a blended learning course, and the factors affecting the quality of these notes are discussed. As individual note-taking performance may be based on student’s characteristics, these contributions are also examined. Some factors about personality and the learning experience are significant and positively affect the grades given to notes. Lexical features of notes taken were extracted using a text analysis technique, and these features were compared with the grades given. The good note-takers constantly recorded terms independently of the number of terms which was presented during the class. Conceptual mapping of the contents of notes was conducted, and it suggests that the deviation in the features of notes can be explained by the number of terms in a lesson.

Originally published in the International Journal on New Computer Architectures and Their Applications (IJNCAA), Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 1056–1065, 2011.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nakayama M, Mutsuura K, Yamamoto H (2011) Evaluation of student’s notes in a blended learning course. Int J New Comput Arch Appl 1(4):1080–1089

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weener P (1974) Note taking and student verbalization as instrumental learning activities. Instr Sci 3:51–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kiewra KA (1989) A review of note-taking: the encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educ Psychol Rev 1(2):147–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Trafton GJ, Trickett SB (2001) Note-taking for self-explanation and problem solving. Hum-Comput Interact 16:1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Piolat A, Olive T, Kellogg RT (2005) Cognitive effort during note taking. Appl Cogn Psychol 19:291–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nye PA, Crooks TJ, Powley M, Tripp G (1984) Student note-taking related to university examination performance. High Educ 13:85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kiewra KA, Benton SL, Kim SI, Risch N, Christensen M (1995) Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemp Educ Psychol 20:172–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakayama M, Mutsuura K, Yamamoto H (2010) Effectiveness of note taking activity in a blended learning environment. In: Proceedings of 9th European conference on e-learning, pp 387–393. Porto, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kiewra KA (1985) Students’ note-taking behaviors and the efficacy of providing the instructor’s notes for review. Contemp Educ Psychol 10:378–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tynajä P (1999) Towards expert knowledge? a comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. Int J Educ Res 31:357–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayer RE, Moreno R, Boire M, Vagge S (1990) Maximizing constructivist learning from multimedia communications by minimizing cognitive load. J Educ Psychol 91:638–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldberg L (1999) A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personal Psychol Eur 7:7–28

    Google Scholar 

  13. IPIP (2001) A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences. http://ipip.ori.org

  14. Nakayama M, Yamamoto H, Santiago R (2008) Impact of information literacy and learner characteristics on learning behavior of Japanese students in on line courses. Int J Case Method Res Appl XX(4):403–415

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nakayama M, Yamamoto H, Santiago R (2007) The impact of learner characteristics on learning performance in hybrid courses among Japanese students. Electron J e-Learn 5(3):195–206

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fujii Y (2007) Development of a scale to evaluate the information literacy level of young people -comparison of junior high school students in japan and northern europe. Jpn J Educ Technol 30(4):387–395

    Google Scholar 

  17. MeCab: Yet another part-of-speech and morphological analyzer. http://mecab.sourceforge.net

  18. Deerwester S, Dumais ST, Furnas GW, Landauer TK, Harshman R (1990) Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci 41:391–407

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B-22300281: 2010–2012).

A portion of this paper were presented at the IEETel2011/DICTAP2011 Conference.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minoru Nakayama .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nakayama, M., Mutsuura, K., Yamamoto, H. (2021). Evaluation of Student’s Notes in a Blended Learning Course. In: Nakayama, M. (eds) Note Taking Activities in E-Learning Environments. Behaviormetrics: Quantitative Approaches to Human Behavior, vol 11. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6104-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics