Abstract
In biodiversity conservation, the identification of appropriate taxonomic units for monitoring and management is pivotal, as it ensures that the efforts are effectively made towards needed species or populations. Misidentification may lead to unwanted results, including hybridization between closely related species or interbreeding between populations with unique local adaptations. Phylogenetic trees, which are graphs that illustrate the evolutionary relationship of organisms, are commonly used to delimit taxonomic groups and provide information for conservation projects. In this review, I discuss the methods of phylogenetic reconstruction, especially molecular phylogenetic methods. I also highlight several ways phylogenetic trees could be used in biodiversity conservation, with examples of their application.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alacs EA, Georges A, FitzSimmons NN, Robertson J (2010) DNA detective: a review of molecular approaches to wildlife forensics. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 6:180–194
Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2009) Conservation and the genetics of populations. John Wiley & Sons
Baker CS, Lento GM, Cipriano F, Palumbi SR (2000) Predicted decline of protected whales based on molecular genetic monitoring of Japanese and Korean markets. Proc Royal Soc London. Series B: Biol Sci 267:1191–1199
Baker CS, Steel D, Choi Y, Lee H, Kim KS, Choi SK, Ma Y-U, Hambleton C, Psihoyos L, Brownell RL, Funahashi N (2010) Genetic evidence of illegal trade in protected whales links Japan with the US and South Korea. Biol Lett 6:647–650
Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW (2013) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D36–D42
Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, Winker K, Ingram KK, Das I (2007) Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 22:148–155
CBOL Plant Working Group, Hollingsworth PM, Forrest LL, Spouge JL, Hajibabaei M, Ratnasingham S, van der Bank M, Chase MW, Cowan RS, Erickson DL, Fazekas AJ, Graham SW, James KE, Kim K-J, John Kress W, Schneider H, van AlphenStahl J, Barrett SCH, van den Berg C, Bogarin D, Burgess KS, Cameron KM, Carine M, Chacón J, Clark A, Clarkson JJ, Conrad F, Devey DS, Ford CS, Hedderson TAJ, Hollingsworth ML, Husband BC, Kelly LJ, Kesanakurti PR, Kim JS, Kim Y-D, Lahaye R, Lee H-L, Long DG, Madriñán S, Maurin O, Meusnier I, Newmaster SG, Park C-W, Percy DM, Petersen G, Richardson JE, Salazar GA, Savolainen V, Seberg O, Wilkinson MJ, Yi D-K, Little DP (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:12794–12797
Cheng S, Melkonian M, Smith SA, Brockington S, Archibald JM, Delaux PM, Li FW, Melkonian B, Mavrodiev EV, Sun W, Fu Y (2018) 10KP: a phylodiverse genome sequencing plan. Gigascience 7(3):giy013
Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9:772
Drummond AJ, Rambaut A (2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol 7:214
Faith DP (1992) Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv 61:1–10
Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791
Felsenstein J (2004) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Distributed by the author. http://www.evolution.gs.washington.edu/phylip.html
Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704
Isaac NJB, Turvey ST, Collen B, Waterman C, Baillie JEM (2007) Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny. PLoS One 2:e296
Ishida Y, Georgiadis NJ, Hondo T, Roca AL (2013) Triangulating the provenance of African elephants using mitochondrial DNA. Evol Appl 6:253–265
Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. Mammalian Protein Metabolism 21–132
Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120
Kling MM, Mishler BD, Thornhill AH, Baldwin BG, Ackerly DD (2018) Facets of phylodiversity: evolutionary diversification, divergence and survival as conservation targets. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 374. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0397
Koepfli K-P, Paten B, the Genome 10K Community of Scientists, O’Brien SJ (2015) The Genome 10K Project: A Way Forward. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-090414-014900
Liu Y-C, Sun X, Driscoll C, Miquelle DG, Xu X, Martelli P, Uphyrkina O, Smith JLD, O’Brien SJ, Luo S-J (2018) Genome-wide evolutionary analysis of natural history and adaptation in the World’s Tigers. Curr Biol 28:3840–3849.e6
Luo S-J, Kim J-H, Johnson WE, van der Walt J, Martenson J, Yuhki N, Miquelle DG, Uphyrkina O, Goodrich JM, Quigley HB, Tilson R, Brady G, Martelli P, Subramaniam V, McDougal C, Hean S, Huang S-Q, Pan W, Karanth UK, Sunquist M, Smith JLD, O’Brien SJ (2004) Phylogeography and genetic ancestry of tigers (Panthera tigris). PLoS Biol 2:e442
Mazel F, Pennell MW, Cadotte MW, Diaz S, Dalla Riva GV, Grenyer R, Leprieur F, Mooers AO, Mouillot D, Tucker CM, Pearse WD (2018) Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably. Nat Commun 9:2888
Nei M, Kumar S. Evan Pugh Professor of Biology Masatoshi Nei(2000) Molecular evolution and Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press
Owen NR, Gumbs R, Gray CL, Faith DP (2019) Global conservation of phylogenetic diversity captures more than just functional diversity. Nat Commun 10:859
Robinson GE, Hackett KJ, Purcell-Miramontes M, Brown SJ, Evans JD, Goldsmith MR, Lawson D, Okamuro J, Robertson HM, Schneider DJ (2011) Creating a buzz about insect genomes. Science 331:1386
Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61:539–542
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425
Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313
Stuart BL, Inger RF, Voris HK (2006) High level of cryptic species diversity revealed by sympatric lineages of Southeast Asian forest frogs. Biol Lett 2:470–474
Swofford DL (2003) Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). http://paup.phylosolutions.com/documentation/faq/#cite
Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S (2021) MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 38:3022
Vane-Wright RI, Humphries CJ, Williams PH (1991) What to protect?—systematics and the agony of choice. Biol Conserv 55:235–254
Winter M, Devictor V, Schweiger O (2013) Phylogenetic diversity and nature conservation: where are we? Trends Ecol Evol 28:199–204
Yang Z (2006) Computational molecular evolution. Oxford University Press
Zhang H, Miller MP, Yang F, Chan HK, Gaubert P, Ades G, Fischer GA (2015) Molecular tracing of confiscated pangolin scales for conservation and illegal trade monitoring in Southeast Asia. Global Ecol Conserv 4:414–422
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Xue, H. (2022). Phylogenetics and its Application in Biodiversity Conservation. In: Kumar, A., Choudhury, B., Dayanandan, S., Khan, M.L. (eds) Molecular Genetics and Genomics Tools in Biodiversity Conservation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6005-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6005-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6004-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6005-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)