Skip to main content

The Cultural Sustainability of the Textile Art Object

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handloom Sustainability and Culture

Abstract

The various handloom techniques are the oldest artistic technologies of humanity. The typologies of archaic weaving techniques, as well as of the raw material, are very diverse on all the meridians of the world. Through the perpetuation of techniques, materials, archetypes and symbols, it has been possible to transmit to this day an entire material and immaterial heritage of fabrics, craft techniques, symbols and decorative motifs, for all the peoples of the world. All these form that patrimony of the archaic textile arts which can be described by the anthropological self-referentiality of the handloom. The material and intangible heritage must be preserved in museums, but capitalized creatively and intelligently so that future generations can understand the identity, history and great cultural diversity of the handloom. The modern concept of cultural sustainability of products is based on the principle of sustainability over time, with a small carbon footprint. The technical processes of making sustainable products in art and textile design require a slowdown in serialization, production and consumption, as well as an increase in added value and creative personalization, with emphasis on the visual semiotics of cultural identity. In this context, the creative design of textiles, oriented towards application areas such as fashion textiles and those for interior or architectural design, use the appropriate cultural tools for any field of sustainable creative industries. The works that are the subject of this article proves that exploratory and experimental research in textile arts, conducted with students of the Department of Textile Arts and Textile Design at UAD Bucharest, was able to validate cultural tools and aesthetic material basis, allowing the creative to express, through specific visual language, an entire individual universe, an archetypal heritage identity, with sustainable cultural values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gheorghiu and Rusu [4].

  2. 2.

    The ethnographic reconstructions, made by teams of young ethnographers, even if they do not reflect the depth of textile plant processing techniques, they generate a practical understanding of the harshness of these techniques as well as the exhausting work of Romanian peasants who were in constant competition with the other women of the village so that every year, at Easter, at the church service, the whole family was dressed in new clothes, the house was decorated with new towels, linen sheets or wool rugs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8MKr_NfGHA&t=662s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAldsF6SCyE&t=742s.

  3. 3.

    Collins dictionary, 2020, UK.

  4. 4.

    Lawson and Noth [9].

  5. 5.

    Foucault, 2000, https://www.lkouniv.ac.in/site/writereaddata/siteContent/202004021930365629saroj_dhal_socio_FOUCOULT.pdf.

  6. 6.

    Pop, 2018.

  7. 7.

    Jin, 2006.

  8. 8.

    Romania interbelica, 2000 http://romaniainterbelica.memoria.ro/judete/romanati/, http://www.muzeultaranuluiroman.ro/acasa/costumul-traditional-in-romania-ro.html.

References

  1. Anderson J, Shattuck L (2012) Design-based research: a decade of progress in education research? Educ Res nr 41(2012):16–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gheorghiu D (2001) Le projet Vădastra, Prehistorie Europeenne. Liege, pp 16–17

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gheorghiu D (2008) Cultural landscapes in the Lower Danube area. Experimenting tell settlements, Documenta Praehistorica XXXV. Liege, pp. 7–13

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gheorghiu D, Rusu A (2008) Cultural landscapes in the Lower Danube area. Experimenting tell settlements, Documenta Praehistorica XXXV. Liege, pp 7–13

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kimbell L (2011) Rethinking design thinking. Part I, Design Cult nr 3(2011):285–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jin Y, Chusilp P (2006) Study of mental iteration in different design situations. Des Stud 27(1):25–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.06.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lawson H (1985) Reflexivity: the post-modern predicament. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Negru M, Bădescu Al, Avram R (2006) Pottery of terra sigillata type discovered In Roman forts of Dacia (Inferior) Malvensis. Published by MUZEUL NAȚIONAL DE ISTORIE A ROMÂNIEI in the Cercetări arheologice, no XIII, pp 231–238

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lawson, Noth (2001) Rethinking design thinking. Part I, Design and culture, vol 3, pp 285-230

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lotman, YM (1990) Universe of the mind: a semiotic theory of culture, Ann Shukman (trans.). I. B. Tauris, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marcus S (1997) Media and self-reference: the forgotten initial state. In: Nöth W (ed) Semiotics of the media: state of the art, projects, and perspectives. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 15–45

    Google Scholar 

  12. Noth W (2006) Representations of imaginary, nonexistent, or nonfigurative objects. Cognitio 7(2). 247–259. Sao Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nöth W (2001) Autorreferencialidad en la crisis de la modernidad. Cuadernos 17:365–369

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nöth W, Ljungberg C (2003) The crisis of representation: semiotic foundations and manifestations in culture and the media. Spec Issue, Semiotica 143(1/4)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moreno DP, Hernandez AA, Yang MC, Otto KN, Linsey JS, Wood KL, Linden A (2014) Fundamental studies in design-by-analogy: a focus on domain-knowledge experts and applications to transactional design problems. Design Stud 35(3):232–272. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hekkert P (2006) Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design. Psychol Sci 48(2): 157–172

    Google Scholar 

  17. O’Sullivan T et al (1994) Key concepts in communication and cultural studies. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pop M, Iuhas F, Borangic C (2016) Repertoriul imagistic Roman, Ed incdtp-icpi Bucuresti, ISBN 978-973-0-23249

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pop M, Toma S, Frigy N (2018) Cultural work instruments in fashion technology - practical method of generating emotional design, J Textile Sci Fashion Tech 1(1):2018. JTSFT.MS.ID. 000505, San Francisco, USA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weber C (2005) International relations theory, a critical introduction, simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, ISBN 0-203-48146-1

    Google Scholar 

  21. https://www.collinsdictionary.com

  22. https://www.mnir.ro/

  23. http://www.muzeultaranuluiroman.ro/acasa/costumul-traditional-in-romania-ro.html, http://romaniainterbelica.memoria.ro/judete/romanati/

  24. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8MKr_NfGHA&t=662s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAldsF6SCyE&t=742s

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pop, M. (2021). The Cultural Sustainability of the Textile Art Object. In: Gardetti, M.Á., Muthu, S.S. (eds) Handloom Sustainability and Culture. Sustainable Textiles: Production, Processing, Manufacturing & Chemistry. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5967-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics