Skip to main content

Vietnam and Motorcycles: Dialectics and Commensurate Adaptations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Community Empowerment, Sustainable Cities, and Transformative Economies

Abstract

Due to rapid urbanisation, mixed traffic in Vietnam’s megacities is getting worse. Dialectics remain unsolved as communities persist with their two-wheel figurehead while the government frames taxonomy and substitution. Driven by the need for reconciliations, the proposed empirical research aims to fill the knowledge gap and to contribute to the Sustainable Path to 2030 Agenda.

The study explored values and threats in relation to motorcycle, proposed solutions to the dialectic, probed for community readiness, and weighted predictors against adaptation. Sequential Exploratory Mixed Methodology was followed to develop a new theory. System data input was collected from three sources: documentary review, qualitative expert interviews, and quantitative survey using questionnaires of 100 variables. More than 700 responses from Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City facilitated the analytics threading four techniques of: Ordinal Logistic Regression with Factors Input, Generalised Linear Models with Ordinal Logistic Response, Spearman’s correlations, and Exploratory Factor Analysis.

Benchmarking between four analytical methods resulted in more than 80 coinciding associations between community acceptance and its determinants that enable a better understanding of the issues related to motorcycles. Emerging determinants include propaganda/education, public bus operation, infrastructure/travel patterns, and regulations change.

The original version of this chapter was revised: This chapter was inadvertently published with incorrect author’s name “Tasya Aspiranti” instead of “Dyen Thanh My Nguyen” which has been corrected now. The correction to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5260-8_39

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 12 January 2022

    A correction has been published.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Three links to Google Forms with questionnaire were:

    Link 1: https://forms.gle/yQPq3SkqXfDy9YNq5

    Link 2: https://forms.gle/H2guGikfhxL3sj4t6

    Link 3: https://forms.gle/TgDDNdfZDQFgZVaM8

References

  • Bakker, S., Contreras, K. D., Kappiantari, M., Nguyen, T. A., Guillen, M. D., Gunthawong, G., et al. (2017). Low-carbon transport policy in four ASEAN countries: Developments in Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltze, M., & Vu, A. T. (2016). Approaches to achieve sustainability in traffic management. In Sustainable development of civil, urban and transportation engineering conference (pp. 205–212). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, X. N., & Thi, H. D. (2017). Actual situation and solutions for reducing the traffic jams and congestion in Vietnam. In Advances in natural and applied sciences. AENSI Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business research methods (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dapice, D., Gomez-Ibanez, J. A., & Thanh, N. X. (2010). Ho Chi Minh City: The challenges of growth. Prepared under UNDP – Harvard Policy Dialogue Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. J., & Barnett, A. G. (2018). An introduction to generalised linear models (4th ed.). Taylor & Francis/CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dung, N. T., & Yoshitaka, K. (2018). Study on traffic situation after operating bus rapid transit system in Hanoi. In International symposium of transport simulation (ISTS’18) and the international workshop on traffic data collection and its standardization (IWTDCS’18). Elsevier Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunteman, G. H., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2006). An introduction to generalised linear models. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, S., & Van Hong, T. (2009). Psychological determinants of the intention to use the bus in Ho Chi Minh City. Journal of Public Transportation, 12(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Celsi, M., Ortinau, D. J., & Bush, R. P. (2017). Essentials of marketing research (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C. Q., & Yamamoto, T. (2011). The role of atitudes and public transport service on vehicle ownership in Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam. In The 34th Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF) proceedings (pp. 1–15). World Transit Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, Q., & Okamura, T. (2018). Analysing behavioral intentions in new residential developments of motorcycle dependent cities: The case of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. In 2018 World conference on transport research society – Case studies on transport policy (pp. 163–172). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonker, J., & Pennink, B. (2010). The essence of research methodology. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum, D. G., & Klein, M. (2002). Logistic regression – A self-learning text (2nd ed.). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, N. T., Miwa, T., & Morikawa, T. (2018). Switching to public transport modes for commuting trips: Considering latent motivations in Ho Chi Minh City. Asian Transport Studies, 5(1), 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, M. Q., Pham, T. T., & Phan, T. T. (2019). Traffic congestion – A prominent problem in Vietnam: Current situation and solutions. EJERS, European Journal of Engineering Research and Science, 4(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H., Montgomery, F., & Timms, P. (2008). Should motorcycle be blamed for traffic congestion in Vietnamese cities? Codatu XIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phan, Y. T., Yano, T., Phan, A. T., Nishimura, T., Sato, T., Hashimoto, Y., et al. (2008). Social surveys on community response to road traffic noise in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. In 9th International Congress on noise as a public health problem. ICBEN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, T. (2007). Social costs of traffic congestion in developing metropolises. Urban Justice & Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien-Pen, Sadullah, A. F. M., & Dao, N. X. (2003). A comparison study on motorcycle traffic development in some Asian countries – Case of Taiwan. In Malaysia and Vietnam. Transportation Studies (EASTS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting. Communicating. Blackwell Publishing – John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, M. T. (2019). Sustainabilization of Hanoi mobiity approached from new residential areas. Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering, 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Quang Chinh Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

1.1 Appendix A

Table 4 87 correlations between the readiness of communities for sustainable public transport and its determinants

1.2 Appendix B

Table 5 High-priority recommendations to policymakers and the transport industry

1.3 Appendix C

List of 100 variables with full descriptions

Variables

Code

Questions

A1: COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY AND CULTURE

The following questions involve the psychological and cultural behavior of the Vietnamese community towards specific vehicles below:

Perceived usefulness(PU)

PU. How do you agree/disagree with the following statements about the usefulness of using a motorcycle:

PU1

Using motorcycles helps me save my time.

PU2

Using motorcycles helps me save my money.

PU3

Motorcycles bring a lot of benefits to my life.

PU4

The motorcycle is the transportation I mostly use.

PU5

Motorcycles can help me make with some earnings (e.g., Grab, Gojek, etc.)

Culture-bound Comfort (CBC)

CBC. How do you agree/disagree with the following statements about Vietnamese behavior:

CBC1

I usually walk to the destination just within a few hundred meters away.

CBC2

I do not get used to using other transport modes except motorcycles.

CBC3

I find it is difficult to use other transport modes.

CBC4

I prioritise riding a motorbike over walking.

CBC5

Motorcycles also express personal property ownership.

Perceive Ease of Use (PEU)

PEU. How do you agree/disagree with the following statements related to ease of use of motorcycles:

PEU1

It is easy to learn how to ride a motorcycle.

PEU2

It is easy to have a motorcycle maintained.

PEU3

It is easy to own a motorcycle rather than other vehicles.

PEU4

It is easy to use my motorcycle for riding to alleys or crowded places.

Reasons Against Substitution (by Community) (RAS)

RAS. How do you agree/disagree with the following reasons for not choosing other transport modes?

RAS1

Using a motorbike is more useful than other transport modes.

RAS2

Motorbikes are easier to use than other vehicles.

RAS3

I always encourage family and friends to use motorbikes.

RAS4

I cannot give up my motorbike riding habit.

RAS5

Other transport modes cannot meet my needs.

A2: GOVERNMENT/INSTITUTIONAL CONCERN

Congestion (CG)

CG. How do you agree about the current traffic jam?

CG1

The transport infrastructure cannot meet all the needs of using motorbikes.

CG2

Traffic jams harm the health as well as the daily life of the residents.

CG3

Traffic jam causes physical damage and transport infrastructure.

CG4

The increasing number and volume of motorcycles is the primary cause of traffic jams.

CG5

Insufficient traffic area (roads, bridges, tunnels, etc.) is the cause of traffic jams.

CG6

Traffic jams do harm to socio-economic development.

CG7

The traffic jam is getting to an uncontrollable level.

CG8

Traffic laws play a decisive role in decreasing traffic congestion.

CG9

The self-awareness of traffic participants will significantly reduce traffic jams.

CG10

Macro investment solutions (metro line, subway, MRT, etc.) will completely reduce traffic jams.

CG11

The above macro investment solutions can partly reduce traffic congestion, if there are no networks and connectivity solutions.

Environmental Pollution (EP)

EP. How do you think about the current environmental pollution?

EP1

The number and volume of motorcycles are increasing, which lead to do harm to the living environment (air pollution).

EP2

High traffic density in big cities causes noise pollution.

EP3

The current legal framework’s sanctions are not strong enough to solve the environmental pollution caused by traffic.

EP4

Traffic participants’ self-awareness is not good enough, which affects environmental pollution.

Accident and Safety (AS)

AS. How do you feel about the following statements related to traffic accidents and traffic safety?

AS1

The increase in motorbike leads to a higher rate of traffic accidents.

AS2

Many motorcycles pass the traffic light, break the speed limit, occupy the roadside… affecting traffic safety.

AS3

Using mobile phones while riding a motorcycle is the direct cause of traffic accident.

AS4

A number of participants lack traffic awareness while riding a motorbike, affect other traffic and adversely impact traffic safety.

AS5

Drinking alcohol and being drunk while riding a motorbike is directly related to traffic safety.

AS6

Two-wheel motorised vehicles (and other vehicles) encroach or go in the opposite direction related to traffic safety.

Other Transport Modes (OTM)

OTM. How do you agree/disagree with the following statements regarding other transport modes?

OTM1

Public transport is not supported by the residents.

OTM2

Public transport does not completely meet the needs of the people.

OTM3

The residents have not been widely propagated about the benefits of other means of transport (bus, metro...)

Policies (PO)

PO. How do you agree/disagree with the following statements regarding the policies?

PO1

Responsibility assignment to authorities is not clear.

PO2

The policies ensuring traffic safety are still lacking.

PO3

The policies ensuring traffic safety are not appropriate.

PO4

The legality of road traffic safety policies is low.

A3: TENTATIVE SOLUTIONS

Here are a number of tentative solutions, how do you agree/disagree with the followings:

Public Bus Operation improvement (PBO)

PBO. How do you agree/disagree with the solutions to improve the current public bus system?

PBO1

I would like to have more bus lines to serve more routes.

PBO2

I want to have more buses to shorten bus waiting times.

PBO3

I want the bus to improve the quality of the seats and its smell.

PBO4

I would like the bus to operate on time.

PBO5

I want the bus to be equipped with WiFi, a clock, surveillance cameras for higher security.

PBO6

I would like to have more automated information about bus stops and bus positioning.

PBO7

I want the bus drivers to become friendlier to the bus passengers and with the motorbike community.

PBO8

The bus should be equipped with additional equipment to assist the disabilities.

PBO9

It is necessary to expand and improve the quality of bus stops (add roofs, seats, maps...)

PBO10

It is necessary to improve the appearance of the bus.

PBO11

Buses should avoid abuse running into the roadway for two-wheel vehicles and pinching them.

PBO12

Buses should limit honking and reduce the emission into the environment.

PBO13

Smaller buses should be mobilised to avoid unused seats on the bus.

Infrastructure/Travel Patterns Improvement (ITP)

ITP. How do you agree with the solutions to improve the current transport infrastructure?

ITP1

Synchronise with urban planning and land-use orientation.

ITP2

It is crucial to allocate lanes and routes properly during peak hours in the city. Avoid overcrowding in one lane and empty flow in the other lane.

ITP3

Adding many automatic movable smart road dividers on some main city routes.

ITP4

Limiting some unsuitable means of transport during peak hours.

ITP5

Adding intermodal travel patterns for the traffic participants (park-and-ride, bike-and-ride)

ITP6

Researching and installing smart traffic light systems (can increase/decrease the traffic signal timing depending on the presence of vehicles at that time).

Regulation change (RGL)

RGL. How do you agree with the policy change below?

RGL1

It is necessary to have policies for restricting new motorcycle registration.

RGL2

Limiting the traffic time for motorcycles.

RGL3

Restricting some routes against motorcycles.

RGL4

Seriously punish motorcyclists who do not have licenses.

RGL5

Increasing motorbike ownership tax.

RGL6

Changing the motorbike price.

RGL7

Reducing urbanisation. Distancing between urban zones.

RGL8

Eliminating the old, low-quality motorbikes and tricycles.

RGL9

Installing additional transportation networks along the main route of MRT.

RGL10

Encourage businesses and schools to apply flexible work hours.

RGL11

Controlling the increase in the number of cars (some studies indicate that if you reduce motorbikes but increase cars, traffic jams will get even worse).

Propaganda/Education Implementation (PEI)

PEI. How do you agree with the implementation of communication/education sessions for traffic participants?

PEI1

Improve the self-awareness of riding a motorbike.

PEI2

Propagating some sanction levels for traffic violations.

PEI3

Propagating about the adverse effects of using alcohol in traffic.

PEI4

It is necessary to educate about the traffic law as long as is suitable for each individual (the traditions, culture, religion, and customs).

PEI5

Setting up feedback systems from residents; listen and seriously deal with each traffic problem.

PEI6

Traffic demand management: Propaganda to avoid riding motorbikes as an unnecessary habit, providing motivation for the young generation to live at home.

PEI7

Propagating/educating bus drivers (and bus assistants) to make them more friendly with residents, especially motorcycle communities.

A4: COMMUNITY ADAPTED BEHAVIOR

If those changes are applied (or a majority of them will be applied), how will you have new perspectives on the use of public transport instead of motorcycles?

Reconciliation Perceived Ease of Use (RPEU)

RPEU. How do you think about the ease of use of other transport modes after making the changes above?

RPEU1

Improving infrastructure (especially roads) will make it easier for me to use public transport.

RPEU2

Changing the quality and adding more buses will make it easier for me to find out the means to get to my destination.

RPEU3

The change of the bus system will make it easier for the disabilities to use.

RPEU4

I am able to adapt immediately to these changes.

RPEU5

In general, after the change, the use/selection of other means will become much easier than before.

Reconciliation Perceived Usefulness (RPU)

RPU. How do you think about the usefulness of other transport modes after making the changes above?

RPU1

Using other transportation (especially public transport) will save time compared to using a motorbike.

RPU2

Using other transportation (especially public transport) will save more money than using a motorbike.

RPU3

These changes in the bus operating system give me more motivation to use this type of service.

RPU4

With the benefits of the above changes, we are able to adjust individual/family behavior in order to adapt to public transport.

Community Actual Usage (CAU)

CAU. Do you intend to use other transport modes instead of motorcycles after the changes as above?

CAU1

I will prefer to use other transport modes (bus, metro...) instead of motorbikes.

CAU2

I will recommend and encourage my relatives and friends to use other transport modes.

CAU3

I agree with the usage restriction of motorcycles on the road.

CAU4

I agree with the aforementioned changes to the bus system.

CAU5

I agree with the above-mentioned changes relating to transport infrastructure.

CAU6

I encourage the government to promote the benefits of using other transport modes.

CAU7

I encourage positive changes in traffic laws, ensuring traffic safety as mentioned above.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nguyen, Q.C., Mishra, S., Nguyen, D.T.M., Nguyen, D.H.T. (2022). Vietnam and Motorcycles: Dialectics and Commensurate Adaptations. In: Chaiechi, T., Wood, J. (eds) Community Empowerment, Sustainable Cities, and Transformative Economies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5260-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5260-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5259-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5260-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics