Abstract
Due to rapid urbanisation, mixed traffic in Vietnam’s megacities is getting worse. Dialectics remain unsolved as communities persist with their two-wheel figurehead while the government frames taxonomy and substitution. Driven by the need for reconciliations, the proposed empirical research aims to fill the knowledge gap and to contribute to the Sustainable Path to 2030 Agenda.
The study explored values and threats in relation to motorcycle, proposed solutions to the dialectic, probed for community readiness, and weighted predictors against adaptation. Sequential Exploratory Mixed Methodology was followed to develop a new theory. System data input was collected from three sources: documentary review, qualitative expert interviews, and quantitative survey using questionnaires of 100 variables. More than 700 responses from Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City facilitated the analytics threading four techniques of: Ordinal Logistic Regression with Factors Input, Generalised Linear Models with Ordinal Logistic Response, Spearman’s correlations, and Exploratory Factor Analysis.
Benchmarking between four analytical methods resulted in more than 80 coinciding associations between community acceptance and its determinants that enable a better understanding of the issues related to motorcycles. Emerging determinants include propaganda/education, public bus operation, infrastructure/travel patterns, and regulations change.
The original version of this chapter was revised: This chapter was inadvertently published with incorrect author’s name “Tasya Aspiranti” instead of “Dyen Thanh My Nguyen” which has been corrected now. The correction to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5260-8_39
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
12 January 2022
A correction has been published.
Notes
- 1.
Three links to Google Forms with questionnaire were:
Link 1: https://forms.gle/yQPq3SkqXfDy9YNq5
References
Bakker, S., Contreras, K. D., Kappiantari, M., Nguyen, T. A., Guillen, M. D., Gunthawong, G., et al. (2017). Low-carbon transport policy in four ASEAN countries: Developments in Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. Sustainability.
Boltze, M., & Vu, A. T. (2016). Approaches to achieve sustainability in traffic management. In Sustainable development of civil, urban and transportation engineering conference (pp. 205–212). Elsevier.
Chu, X. N., & Thi, H. D. (2017). Actual situation and solutions for reducing the traffic jams and congestion in Vietnam. In Advances in natural and applied sciences. AENSI Publication.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business research methods (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Dapice, D., Gomez-Ibanez, J. A., & Thanh, N. X. (2010). Ho Chi Minh City: The challenges of growth. Prepared under UNDP – Harvard Policy Dialogue Papers.
Dobson, A. J., & Barnett, A. G. (2018). An introduction to generalised linear models (4th ed.). Taylor & Francis/CRC Press.
Dung, N. T., & Yoshitaka, K. (2018). Study on traffic situation after operating bus rapid transit system in Hanoi. In International symposium of transport simulation (ISTS’18) and the international workshop on traffic data collection and its standardization (IWTDCS’18). Elsevier Ltd.
Dunteman, G. H., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2006). An introduction to generalised linear models. Sage.
Fujii, S., & Van Hong, T. (2009). Psychological determinants of the intention to use the bus in Ho Chi Minh City. Journal of Public Transportation, 12(1).
Hair, J. F., Celsi, M., Ortinau, D. J., & Bush, R. P. (2017). Essentials of marketing research (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Ho, C. Q., & Yamamoto, T. (2011). The role of atitudes and public transport service on vehicle ownership in Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam. In The 34th Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF) proceedings (pp. 1–15). World Transit Research.
Hoang, Q., & Okamura, T. (2018). Analysing behavioral intentions in new residential developments of motorcycle dependent cities: The case of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. In 2018 World conference on transport research society – Case studies on transport policy (pp. 163–172). Elsevier.
Jonker, J., & Pennink, B. (2010). The essence of research methodology. Springer.
Kleinbaum, D. G., & Klein, M. (2002). Logistic regression – A self-learning text (2nd ed.). Springer.
Nguyen, N. T., Miwa, T., & Morikawa, T. (2018). Switching to public transport modes for commuting trips: Considering latent motivations in Ho Chi Minh City. Asian Transport Studies, 5(1), 117–136.
Nguyen, M. Q., Pham, T. T., & Phan, T. T. (2019). Traffic congestion – A prominent problem in Vietnam: Current situation and solutions. EJERS, European Journal of Engineering Research and Science, 4(9).
Nguyen, H., Montgomery, F., & Timms, P. (2008). Should motorcycle be blamed for traffic congestion in Vietnamese cities? Codatu XIII.
Phan, Y. T., Yano, T., Phan, A. T., Nishimura, T., Sato, T., Hashimoto, Y., et al. (2008). Social surveys on community response to road traffic noise in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. In 9th International Congress on noise as a public health problem. ICBEN.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Shibata, T. (2007). Social costs of traffic congestion in developing metropolises. Urban Justice & Sustainability.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
Tien-Pen, Sadullah, A. F. M., & Dao, N. X. (2003). A comparison study on motorcycle traffic development in some Asian countries – Case of Taiwan. In Malaysia and Vietnam. Transportation Studies (EASTS).
Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting. Communicating. Blackwell Publishing – John Wiley & Sons.
Tran, M. T. (2019). Sustainabilization of Hanoi mobiity approached from new residential areas. Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering, 89–99.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendices
1.1 Appendix A
1.2 Appendix B
1.3 Appendix C
List of 100 variables with full descriptions
Variables | Code | Questions |
---|---|---|
A1: COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY AND CULTURE The following questions involve the psychological and cultural behavior of the Vietnamese community towards specific vehicles below: | ||
Perceived usefulness(PU) | PU. How do you agree/disagree with the following statements about the usefulness of using a motorcycle: | |
PU1 | Using motorcycles helps me save my time. | |
PU2 | Using motorcycles helps me save my money. | |
PU3 | Motorcycles bring a lot of benefits to my life. | |
PU4 | The motorcycle is the transportation I mostly use. | |
PU5 | Motorcycles can help me make with some earnings (e.g., Grab, Gojek, etc.) | |
Culture-bound Comfort (CBC) | CBC. How do you agree/disagree with the following statements about Vietnamese behavior: | |
CBC1 | I usually walk to the destination just within a few hundred meters away. | |
CBC2 | I do not get used to using other transport modes except motorcycles. | |
CBC3 | I find it is difficult to use other transport modes. | |
CBC4 | I prioritise riding a motorbike over walking. | |
CBC5 | Motorcycles also express personal property ownership. | |
Perceive Ease of Use (PEU) | PEU. How do you agree/disagree with the following statements related to ease of use of motorcycles: | |
PEU1 | It is easy to learn how to ride a motorcycle. | |
PEU2 | It is easy to have a motorcycle maintained. | |
PEU3 | It is easy to own a motorcycle rather than other vehicles. | |
PEU4 | It is easy to use my motorcycle for riding to alleys or crowded places. | |
Reasons Against Substitution (by Community) (RAS) | RAS. How do you agree/disagree with the following reasons for not choosing other transport modes? | |
RAS1 | Using a motorbike is more useful than other transport modes. | |
RAS2 | Motorbikes are easier to use than other vehicles. | |
RAS3 | I always encourage family and friends to use motorbikes. | |
RAS4 | I cannot give up my motorbike riding habit. | |
RAS5 | Other transport modes cannot meet my needs. | |
A2: GOVERNMENT/INSTITUTIONAL CONCERN | ||
Congestion (CG) | CG. How do you agree about the current traffic jam? | |
CG1 | The transport infrastructure cannot meet all the needs of using motorbikes. | |
CG2 | Traffic jams harm the health as well as the daily life of the residents. | |
CG3 | Traffic jam causes physical damage and transport infrastructure. | |
CG4 | The increasing number and volume of motorcycles is the primary cause of traffic jams. | |
CG5 | Insufficient traffic area (roads, bridges, tunnels, etc.) is the cause of traffic jams. | |
CG6 | Traffic jams do harm to socio-economic development. | |
CG7 | The traffic jam is getting to an uncontrollable level. | |
CG8 | Traffic laws play a decisive role in decreasing traffic congestion. | |
CG9 | The self-awareness of traffic participants will significantly reduce traffic jams. | |
CG10 | Macro investment solutions (metro line, subway, MRT, etc.) will completely reduce traffic jams. | |
CG11 | The above macro investment solutions can partly reduce traffic congestion, if there are no networks and connectivity solutions. | |
Environmental Pollution (EP) | EP. How do you think about the current environmental pollution? | |
EP1 | The number and volume of motorcycles are increasing, which lead to do harm to the living environment (air pollution). | |
EP2 | High traffic density in big cities causes noise pollution. | |
EP3 | The current legal framework’s sanctions are not strong enough to solve the environmental pollution caused by traffic. | |
EP4 | Traffic participants’ self-awareness is not good enough, which affects environmental pollution. | |
Accident and Safety (AS) | AS. How do you feel about the following statements related to traffic accidents and traffic safety? | |
AS1 | The increase in motorbike leads to a higher rate of traffic accidents. | |
AS2 | Many motorcycles pass the traffic light, break the speed limit, occupy the roadside… affecting traffic safety. | |
AS3 | Using mobile phones while riding a motorcycle is the direct cause of traffic accident. | |
AS4 | A number of participants lack traffic awareness while riding a motorbike, affect other traffic and adversely impact traffic safety. | |
AS5 | Drinking alcohol and being drunk while riding a motorbike is directly related to traffic safety. | |
AS6 | Two-wheel motorised vehicles (and other vehicles) encroach or go in the opposite direction related to traffic safety. | |
Other Transport Modes (OTM) | OTM. How do you agree/disagree with the following statements regarding other transport modes? | |
OTM1 | Public transport is not supported by the residents. | |
OTM2 | Public transport does not completely meet the needs of the people. | |
OTM3 | The residents have not been widely propagated about the benefits of other means of transport (bus, metro...) | |
Policies (PO) | PO. How do you agree/disagree with the following statements regarding the policies? | |
PO1 | Responsibility assignment to authorities is not clear. | |
PO2 | The policies ensuring traffic safety are still lacking. | |
PO3 | The policies ensuring traffic safety are not appropriate. | |
PO4 | The legality of road traffic safety policies is low. | |
A3: TENTATIVE SOLUTIONS Here are a number of tentative solutions, how do you agree/disagree with the followings: | ||
Public Bus Operation improvement (PBO) | PBO. How do you agree/disagree with the solutions to improve the current public bus system? | |
PBO1 | I would like to have more bus lines to serve more routes. | |
PBO2 | I want to have more buses to shorten bus waiting times. | |
PBO3 | I want the bus to improve the quality of the seats and its smell. | |
PBO4 | I would like the bus to operate on time. | |
PBO5 | I want the bus to be equipped with WiFi, a clock, surveillance cameras for higher security. | |
PBO6 | I would like to have more automated information about bus stops and bus positioning. | |
PBO7 | I want the bus drivers to become friendlier to the bus passengers and with the motorbike community. | |
PBO8 | The bus should be equipped with additional equipment to assist the disabilities. | |
PBO9 | It is necessary to expand and improve the quality of bus stops (add roofs, seats, maps...) | |
PBO10 | It is necessary to improve the appearance of the bus. | |
PBO11 | Buses should avoid abuse running into the roadway for two-wheel vehicles and pinching them. | |
PBO12 | Buses should limit honking and reduce the emission into the environment. | |
PBO13 | Smaller buses should be mobilised to avoid unused seats on the bus. | |
Infrastructure/Travel Patterns Improvement (ITP) | ITP. How do you agree with the solutions to improve the current transport infrastructure? | |
ITP1 | Synchronise with urban planning and land-use orientation. | |
ITP2 | It is crucial to allocate lanes and routes properly during peak hours in the city. Avoid overcrowding in one lane and empty flow in the other lane. | |
ITP3 | Adding many automatic movable smart road dividers on some main city routes. | |
ITP4 | Limiting some unsuitable means of transport during peak hours. | |
ITP5 | Adding intermodal travel patterns for the traffic participants (park-and-ride, bike-and-ride) | |
ITP6 | Researching and installing smart traffic light systems (can increase/decrease the traffic signal timing depending on the presence of vehicles at that time). | |
Regulation change (RGL) | RGL. How do you agree with the policy change below? | |
RGL1 | It is necessary to have policies for restricting new motorcycle registration. | |
RGL2 | Limiting the traffic time for motorcycles. | |
RGL3 | Restricting some routes against motorcycles. | |
RGL4 | Seriously punish motorcyclists who do not have licenses. | |
RGL5 | Increasing motorbike ownership tax. | |
RGL6 | Changing the motorbike price. | |
RGL7 | Reducing urbanisation. Distancing between urban zones. | |
RGL8 | Eliminating the old, low-quality motorbikes and tricycles. | |
RGL9 | Installing additional transportation networks along the main route of MRT. | |
RGL10 | Encourage businesses and schools to apply flexible work hours. | |
RGL11 | Controlling the increase in the number of cars (some studies indicate that if you reduce motorbikes but increase cars, traffic jams will get even worse). | |
Propaganda/Education Implementation (PEI) | PEI. How do you agree with the implementation of communication/education sessions for traffic participants? | |
PEI1 | Improve the self-awareness of riding a motorbike. | |
PEI2 | Propagating some sanction levels for traffic violations. | |
PEI3 | Propagating about the adverse effects of using alcohol in traffic. | |
PEI4 | It is necessary to educate about the traffic law as long as is suitable for each individual (the traditions, culture, religion, and customs). | |
PEI5 | Setting up feedback systems from residents; listen and seriously deal with each traffic problem. | |
PEI6 | Traffic demand management: Propaganda to avoid riding motorbikes as an unnecessary habit, providing motivation for the young generation to live at home. | |
PEI7 | Propagating/educating bus drivers (and bus assistants) to make them more friendly with residents, especially motorcycle communities. | |
A4: COMMUNITY ADAPTED BEHAVIOR If those changes are applied (or a majority of them will be applied), how will you have new perspectives on the use of public transport instead of motorcycles? | ||
Reconciliation Perceived Ease of Use (RPEU) | RPEU. How do you think about the ease of use of other transport modes after making the changes above? | |
RPEU1 | Improving infrastructure (especially roads) will make it easier for me to use public transport. | |
RPEU2 | Changing the quality and adding more buses will make it easier for me to find out the means to get to my destination. | |
RPEU3 | The change of the bus system will make it easier for the disabilities to use. | |
RPEU4 | I am able to adapt immediately to these changes. | |
RPEU5 | In general, after the change, the use/selection of other means will become much easier than before. | |
Reconciliation Perceived Usefulness (RPU) | RPU. How do you think about the usefulness of other transport modes after making the changes above? | |
RPU1 | Using other transportation (especially public transport) will save time compared to using a motorbike. | |
RPU2 | Using other transportation (especially public transport) will save more money than using a motorbike. | |
RPU3 | These changes in the bus operating system give me more motivation to use this type of service. | |
RPU4 | With the benefits of the above changes, we are able to adjust individual/family behavior in order to adapt to public transport. | |
Community Actual Usage (CAU) | CAU. Do you intend to use other transport modes instead of motorcycles after the changes as above? | |
CAU1 | I will prefer to use other transport modes (bus, metro...) instead of motorbikes. | |
CAU2 | I will recommend and encourage my relatives and friends to use other transport modes. | |
CAU3 | I agree with the usage restriction of motorcycles on the road. | |
CAU4 | I agree with the aforementioned changes to the bus system. | |
CAU5 | I agree with the above-mentioned changes relating to transport infrastructure. | |
CAU6 | I encourage the government to promote the benefits of using other transport modes. | |
CAU7 | I encourage positive changes in traffic laws, ensuring traffic safety as mentioned above. |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nguyen, Q.C., Mishra, S., Nguyen, D.T.M., Nguyen, D.H.T. (2022). Vietnam and Motorcycles: Dialectics and Commensurate Adaptations. In: Chaiechi, T., Wood, J. (eds) Community Empowerment, Sustainable Cities, and Transformative Economies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5260-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5260-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5259-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5260-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)