Skip to main content

When is Breaking a Promise Allowed? Contract Law

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Econo-Legal Studies

Abstract

A contract is a tool for social and economic cooperation, and adhering to contracts is a universal rule dictated by society. Contracts enable people to coexist and live better and happier lives through voluntary, mutually beneficial economic exchanges. From this perspective, the legal system supporting contracts is desirable from both economics and law perspectives. However, each country’s laws vary greatly, including their methods for addressing and remedying contract breaches. In this chapter, we attempt to clarify why Japanese and English laws differ greatly in their approaches to obligations to mitigate damages (i.e., the other party’s obligation to cooperate to reduce the liability of the breaching contractor) despite having almost identical rules regarding the scope of damages. This chapter also investigates which method is superior from the perspectives of economics and law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In Japanese law, if the painting is transferred to C and cannot be reclaimed, damages become the remedy for the breach owing to the impossibility of performance (see also Sect. 7.2.1). The analysis of this case is the same as that of compensation for the expectation interest.

References

  • Campbell D (2007) Keiyaku ihan no kankeiteki keiyakuron ni yoru saikōsei: keiyaku ihan seido no daini genri to shite no kyōryoku no igi (Reconstructing breach of contract with relational contract theory: the meaning of cooperation as second principle of the breach of contract system). In: Saito A (ed) Ichiba to tekiō (Market and adaptation). Horitsu Bunka Sha. Kyoto, pp 38–55 [publication in Japanese]

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz MJ (1977) The transformation of American law, 1780–1860. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida T (1990) Kyōsei shikkō to songai baishō: “songai keigen gimu” no kanten kara (Compulsory execution and compensation for damages: from the perspective of the “duty to mitigate damages”). Hōsō Jiho 42(10):1–29 [publication in Japanese]

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Tanaka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Saito, A., Tanaka, H., Zasu, Y. (2021). When is Breaking a Promise Allowed? Contract Law. In: Yanagawa, T., Takahashi, H., Ouchi, S. (eds) Econo-Legal Studies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5145-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5145-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5144-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5145-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics