Skip to main content

Forward-Looking Lens to Mainstream Blue-Green Infrastructure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ecosystem-Based Disaster and Climate Resilience

Part of the book series: Disaster and Risk Research: GADRI Book Series ((DRRGBS))

  • 839 Accesses

Abstract

Healthy natural ecosystem can provide resilience and ecosystem services with socio-economic and environmental benefits. Strategic deployment through systematic connected open spaces, water bodies and vegetated spaces through spatial and fiscal planning can develop blue-green infrastructure (BGI). Performance of any BGI can be designed for targets to achieve. This chapter explores pertinent aspects which influence planning, implementation and maintenance of BGI. The pandemic COVID-19 brought challenges to development; yet, stakeholders agree on preservation and conservation of nature in the form of utilitarian use like BGI to attenuate anthropogenic interventions. Next-generation built environment will look for greater integration of building, services, surrounding open areas, and engineered (grey) and nature-based blue-green infrastructure. An innovative attempt on understanding future climate change scenario with Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs), Shared Climate Policy Assumptions (SPAs) and RCP–SSP–SPA framework using lens of Eco-DRR and EbA is discussed for developing future climate policy at country and sub-national levels. To propagate the BGI for Eco-DRR and EbA to arrest surface transformation and fragmentation, adaptive governance through participatory implementation can empower communities. The BGI, no-regret strategy for the leaders, authorities and communities, shall be part of sustainable resilient development schemes globally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ambrose J, Harvey F (2020) Cop26 climate talks in Glasgow postponed until 2021. In: Proceedings of the Crucial UN Conference Will be Delayed Until Next Year as a Result of the Coronavirus Crisis, Kings Place

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin Biotope Area of Factor-Implementation Guidelines Helping to Control Temperature and Runoff Climate Adapt. Available online: https://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/metadata/case-studies/berlinbiotope-area-factor-2013-implementation-of-guidelines-helping-to-control-temperature-andrunoff/#challenges_anchor. Accessed on 5 Jan 2020

  • Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI) (2020) Nature-based solutions (NBS): strengthening synergies for building resilient infrastructure. Webinar, November 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Collado S, Staats H, Corraliza JA, Hartig T (2017) Restorative environments and health. In: Fleury-Bahi G, Pol E, Navarro O (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 127–148

    Google Scholar 

  • De B, Mukherjee M (2014) Strategies and challenges for energy efficient retrofitting: study of empire state building. J Inst Eng (india) Series A 94(4):251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely M, Pitman S (2012) Green infrastructure life support for human habitats. A review of research and literature: Prepared for the Green Infrastructure Project, Botanic Gardens of Adelaide, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 15:441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haasova S, Czellar S, Rahmani L, Morgan N (2020) Connectedness with nature and individual responses to a pandemic: an exploratory study. Front Psychol 11:2215. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T, Mitchell R, De Vries S, Frumkin H (2014) Nature and health. Annu Rev Public Health 35:207–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausfather Z (2018) Explainer: how ‘Shared Socioeconomic Pathways’ explore future climate change. https://www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-how-shared-socioeconomic-pathways-explore-future-climate-change. Accessed on 30 Dec 2020

  • https://www.conservation.org/stories/impact-of-covid-19-on-nature, Accessed on 9 Jan 2021

  • https://www.wwf.org.uk/nature-and-pandemics, Accessed on 19 Jan 2021

  • IPBES Workshop Report on Biodiversity and Pandemics Executive Summary: IPBES (2020) Workshop Report on biodiversity and pandemics of the intergovernmental platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Daszak P, das Neves C, Amuasi J, Hayman D, Kuiken T, Roche B, Zambrana-Torrelio C, Buss P, Dundarova H, Feferholtz Y, Foldvari G, Igbinosa E, Junglen S, Liu Q, Suzan G, Uhart M, Wannous C, Woolaston K, Mosig Reidl P, O’Brien K, Pascual U, Stoett P, Li H, Ngo HT, IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4147317

  • IPCC (2014) The IPCC's fifth assessment report (AR5). Climate Change 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones R, Patwardhan A, Cohen S, Dessai S, Lammel A, Lempert R, Mirza MMQ, von Storch, H (2014) Foundations for decision making. In: Field CB, Barros V, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy A, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Climate Change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Working Group II contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 195–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriegler E, O’Neill BC, Hallegatte S, Kram T, Lempert R, Moss R, Wilbanks T (2012) The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: a new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways. Glob Environ Chang 22:807–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link D (2020) Fact check: COVID-19 crisis has not created decreased long-term human environmental impact. USA Today. Available at: https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/03/25/fact-check-coronavirus-crisis-benefiting-environment/2908300001/. Accessed Jan 2021

  • Mukherjee M, Takara K (2018) Urban green space as a countermeasure to increasing urban risk and the UGS-3CC resilience framework. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction 2:854–861

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee M, Chatterjee R, Khanna BK, Dhillon PPS, Kumar A, Bajwa S, Prakash A, Shaw R (2020) Ecosystem-centric business continuity planning (eco-centric BCP): a post COVID19 new normal. Progr Disaster Sci 7:100–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthusankar G, Proisy C, Balasubramanian D, Bautès N, Bhalla RS, Mathevet R, Ricout A, Senthil Babu D, Vasudevan S (2018) When socio-economic plans exacerbate vulnerability to physical coastal processes on the south east coast of India. In: Shim J-S, Chun I, Lim HS (eds) Proceedings from the international coastal symposium (ICS) 2018 (Busan, Republic of Korea). J Coastal Res (Special Issue No. 85):1446–1450. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic N, Lempert RJ, Janetos AC (2014) A Framework for the development of new socio-economic scenarios for climate change research: introductory essay. Clim Change 122:351–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Okyere I, Chuku EO, Ekumah B et al (2010) Physical distancing and risk of COVID-19 in small-scale fisheries: a remote sensing assessment in coastal Ghana. Sci Rep 10, 22407 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79898-4TEEB. Mainstreaming the Economics of nature: a Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. Accessed on 5 Jan 2021

  • RCES (2018) Creation of a Regional circular and ecological sphere (R-CES) to address local challenges, available from: https://www.env.go.jp/en/wpaper/2018/pdf/04.pdf. Accessed on 29 Jan 2021

  • Strong DR, Frank KT (2010) Human involvement in food webs. Annu Rev Environ Resour 35(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomalla F, Kumar A (2020) Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction: implementing nature-based solutions for resilience, United Nations office for disaster risk reduction—Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. Thailand UNDRR, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington R, edited, UNDRR (2020) The Words-into-Action guideline on “Nature-based Solutions for Disaster Risk Reduction” Engaging for resilience in support of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahua Mukherjee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mukherjee, M., Shaw, R. (2021). Forward-Looking Lens to Mainstream Blue-Green Infrastructure. In: Mukherjee, M., Shaw, R. (eds) Ecosystem-Based Disaster and Climate Resilience. Disaster and Risk Research: GADRI Book Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4815-1_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics