Skip to main content

Ecosystem-Based Adaptation (EbA) in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: Status, Progress and Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ecosystem-Based Disaster and Climate Resilience

Abstract

Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA) has been gaining attention in science, policy and practice as an effective way to address climate change and contribute to sustainable development. In Hindu Kush Himalaya (HKH), EbAs are implemented to enhance resilience of mountain communities to the harsh realities of climate change. However, very little documentation exists on nature and progress of EbA in the region, which are often fragmented and scattered. We analyzed the status, progress, benefits and challenges in EbA implementation. EbAs are focused on restoration (17%), mainstreaming in policy and plans (17%), ecosystem conservation (14%), flood risk management (12%), livelihoods (10%), capacity building (10%) and ecological risks assessment (7%). Though EbA varies across the countries, ecosystem conservation and livelihoods diversification is the focus. Major drivers of changes considered are climate change, floods, drought and landslides. Improved resilience through restoration, capacity building, better networking and better wellbeing are some of the notable benefits. However, awareness and mainstreaming of EbA in policies and plans are limited. Limited cooperation among the countries and stakeholders and short-lived donor-driven agendas are also the challenges. An effective and impactful EbA requires an integrated approach encompassing different sectors with vertical and horizontal cooperation and collaboration at the regional scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity including 20 Aichi targets were adopted during the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties, held from 18 to 29 October 2010, in Nagoya, Aichi Prefecture, Japan for the 2011–2020 period. The plan is an overarching framework on biodiversity conservation and management (CBD 2010).

  2. 2.

    The indigenous ethnic community is a tribe/community native to a particular area with its own mother tongue, traditional culture and egalitarian social structure. They do not fall under the conventional Hindu hierarchical caste structure (GoN 2009).

References

  • Bakker MHN, Duncan JA (2017) Future bottlenecks in international river basins: where transboundary institutions, population growth and hydrological variability intersect. Water Int 42(4):400–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brink E, Aalders T, Ádám D, Feller R, Henselek Y, Hoffmann A, Ibe K, Matthey-Doret A, Meyer M, Negrut NL, Rau AL, Riewerts B, von Schuckmann L, Törnros S, von Wehrden H, Abson DJ, Wamsler C (2016) Cascades of green: a review of ecosystem-based adaptation in urban areas. Glob Environ Chang 36:111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castleberry A, Nolen A (2018) Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it an easy as it sounds? Curr Pharm Teach Learn 10(6):807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2010) Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020 and the aichi targets. CBD Secretariat, Montreal Canada. https://www.cbd.int/doc/strategic-plan/2011-2020/Aichi-Targets-EN.pdf

  • CBD (2020) Sixth national reports to convention on biological diversity. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary S, McGregor A (2018) A critical analysis of global ecosystem services (paristhiki sewa) in Nepal. Land Use Policy 75:364–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary S, McGregor A, Houston D, Chettri N (2015) The evolution of ecosystem services: a time-series and discourse-centred analysis. Environ Sci Policy 54:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong J (2014) Ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation: progress and challenges. Int Environ Agreement 14(2014):391–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Shacham E, Walters G, Janzen C, Maginnis S (eds) (2016) Nature-based Solutions to address global societal challenges. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. xiii + 97p

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahal RK, Hasegawa S (2008) Representative rainfall thresholds for landslides in the Nepal Himalaya. Geomorphology 100(3–4):429–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.01.014

  • Deo A, Garner D (2014) Tropical cyclone activity over the Indian ocean in the warmer climate. In: Mohanty UC (ed) Monitoring and prediction of tropical cyclones in the Indian Ocean and climate change. Springer, New Delhi, pp 72–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhyani S, Lahoti S, Khare S, Pujari P, Verma P (2018) Ecosystem based disaster risk reduction approaches (EbDRR) as a prerequisite for inclusive urban transformation of Nagpur City, India. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction 32:95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GoN (2009) Guidelines for Community Forestry Development Programme Community Forest. Ministry of Forests and Environment, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha-Sapir D, Hoyois P, Below R (2013) Annual disaster statistical review 2012: the numbers and trends. CRED, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups, I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151p

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2020) Ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUC), Gland, Switzerland. https://www.iucn.org/theme/ecosystem-management/our-work/ecosystem-based-approaches-climate-change-adaptation

  • JICA (2009) The study on disaster risk management for Narayangharh-Mugling highway. Final report, vol I, Summary. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Nippon koei co., Ltd., pp 4–11. http://open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/11922242_01.pdf. Accessed on 02 Aug 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones HP, Hole DG, Zavaleta ES (2012) Harnessing nature to help people adapt to climate change. Nat Clim Chang 2(7):504–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundzewicz ZW, Kanae S, Seneviratne SI, Handmer J, Nicholls N, Peduzzi P, Mechler R, Bouwer LM, Arnell N, Mach K, Muir-Wood R, Brakenridge RG, Kron W, Benito G, Honda Y, Takahashi K, Sherstyukov K (2014) Flood risk and climate change: global and regional perspectives. Hydrol Sci J 59(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.857411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo V (2016) Synthesis report on experiences with ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. In; Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-85-en.pdf

  • MEA (2005) Linking ecosystem services and human wellbeing. In: 3, C. (ed)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer J (2010) Disaster risk reduction or climate change adaptation: are we reinventing the wheel? J Int Dev 22(2):247–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirza MMQ (2011) Climate change, flooding in South Asia and implications. Reg Environ Change 11:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier RA, Robles-Gil P, Hoffmann M, Pilgrim JD, Brooks TB, Mittermeier CG, Lamoreux JL, Fonseca GAB (2004) Hotspots revisited: earth’s biologically richest and most endangered ecoregions. CEMEX, Mexico City, Mexico, p 390

    Google Scholar 

  • Molden D, Sharma E, Shrestha AB, Chettri N, Pradhan NS, Kotru R (2017) Advancing regional and transboundary cooperation in the conflict-prone Hindu Kush Himalaya. Mountain Res Develop 37(4). https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-17-00108.1

  • Monty F, Murti R, Miththapala S, Buyck C (eds) (2017) Ecosystems protecting infrastructure and communities: lessons learned and guidelines for implementation. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, x + 108p

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalau J, Becken S, Mackey B (2018) Ecosystem-based adaptation: a review of the constraints. Environ Sci Policy 89:357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojea E (2015) Challenges for mainstreaming ecosystem-based adaptation into the international climate agenda. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.006

  • Reid H, Adhikari A (2018) Ecosystem-based adaptation: strengthening the evidence and informing policy. International Institute for Environment and Development, Inn Road, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid H, Zhang Y (2018) Ecosystem-based approaches to adaptation: strengthening the evidence and informing policy. Research results from the Participatory Plant Breeding and Community Supported Agriculture project, China. IIED Project Report. IIED, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid H, Seddon N, Barrow E, Hicks C, Hou-Jones X, Kapos V, Rizvi AR, Roe D, Wicander S (2017) Ecosystem-based adaptation: question-based guidance for assessing effectiveness. IIED, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saroar MM, Rahman MM, Bahauddin KM, Rahaman MA (2019) Ecosystem-based adaptation: opportunities and challenges in coastal Bangladesh. In: Huq et al. (eds) Confronting climate change in Bangladesh. The Anthropocene: Politik, Economics, Society and Science, vol 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05237-9_5

  • Schipper L, Pelling M (2006) Disaster risk, climate change and international development: scope for, and challenges to, integration. Disasters 30(1):19–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00304.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon N, Reid H, Barrow E, Hicks C, Hou-Jones X, Kapos V, Rizvi AR, Roe D (2016a) Ecosystem-based approaches to adaptation: strengthening the evidence and informing policy: research overview and overarching questions. IIED, London. Available at http://pubs.iied.org/G04045/

  • Seddon N, Hou-Jones X, Pye T, Reid H, Roe D., Mountain D, Rizvi AR (2016b) Ecosystem-based adaptation: a win-win formula for sustainability in a warming world? IIED Briefing paper. IIED, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah SIA, Zhou J, Shah AA (2019) Ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) practices in smallholder agriculture; emerging evidence from rural Pakistan. J Cleaner Prod 218:673–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma E, Chettri N, Tse-ring K (2009) Climate change impacts and vulnerability in the Eastern Himalayas. ICIMOD, Kathmandu, p 27

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma E, Molden D et al (2019) Introduction to the Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment. In: Wester P, Mishra A, Mukherji A, Shrestha A (eds) The Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Nair SS, Gupta AK (2013) Ecosystem services for disaster risk reduction: a case study of wetland in East Delhi Region, India. Global J Human Social Sci Geogr Geo-Sci Environ Disaster Manage 13(4):37–47. Retrieved from http://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/646

  • Song Y, Zhang Y, Song X, Buckley L (2015) Emerging biocultural innovations for climate resilience in southwest China. SIFOR qualitative baseline study. IIED, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiderska K, King-Okumu C, Monirul Islam M (2017) Ecosystem-based adaptation: a handbook for EbA in mountain, dryland and coastal ecosystems. IIED, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapa PS, Adhikari BR (2019) Development of community-based landslide early warning system in the earthquake-affected areas of Nepal. J Mt Sci 16(12):2701–2713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timalsina R, Songwathana P (2020) Factors enhancing resilience among older adults experiencing disaster: a systematic review. Australas Emergency Care 23(1):11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2019.12.007

  • Triyanti A, Chu E (2018) A survey of governance approaches to ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction: Current gaps and future directions. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction 32:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2015) EbA annual progress report. United Nations Development Programme Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal. Accessed at: https://www.np.undp.org/content/nepal/en/home/operations/projects/closed-projects/environment---energy/eba/home.html

  • UNFCCC (2015) Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Conference of the Parties twenty-first session, Paris, 30 Nov to 11 Dec 2015. http://bit.ly/2GGWXXa

  • UNOCHA August 21, 2017. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Nepal%20Flood%20Sitrep%2021%20August%202017.pdf

  • Wester P, Mishra A, Mukherji A, Shrestha ABS (eds) (2019) The Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment—mountains, climate change, sustainability and people. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92288-1

  • Yusuf AA, Francisco HA (2009) Climate change vulnerability mapping for Southeast Asia. Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), Singapore. Available at https://www.idrc.ca/sites/default/files/sp/Documents%20EN/climate-change-vulnerability-mapping-sa.pdf

  • Zolch T, Wamsler C, Pauleit S (2018) Integrating the ecosystem-based approach into municipal climate adaptation strategies: the case of Germany. J Cleaner Prod 170:966–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.146

Download references

Acknowledgements

ICIMOD gratefully acknowledges the support of its core donors: the Governments of Afghanistan, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Myanmar, Nepal, Norway, Pakistan, Sweden and Switzerland. Disclaimer: The views and interpretations in this publication are those of the authors. They are not necessarily attributable to ICIMOD and do not imply the expression of any opinion by ICIMOD concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area of its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or the endorsement of any product.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunita Chaudhary .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex

Annex

Annex 1: Links between Aichi Targets and EbA and Eco-DRR

Strategic goal

Aichi target

Link to EbA and Eco-DRR

B. Reduce direct pressures biodiversity and promote sustainable use

Target 5: By 2020, the rate of loss of all natural habitats, including forests, is at least halved and where feasible brought close to zero and degradation and fragmentation is significantly reduced

Forests and coastal vegetation can serve as a protective buffer from extreme events

 

Target 7: By 2020 areas under agriculture, aquaculture and forestry are managed sustainably, ensuring conservation of biodiversity

DRR is a core element of sustainability for forestry and agriculture; forests serve as a protective buffer from erosion and landslides

 

Target 10: By 2015, the multiple anthropogenic pressures on coral reefs and other vulnerable ecosystems impacted by climate change or ocean acidification are minimized, so as to maintain their integrity and functioning

Coral reefs can be effective in protecting against coastal hazards, such as by reducing wave energy

C: Improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity

Target 11: By 2020, at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water areas and 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, are conserved through effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures and integrated into the wider landscapes and seascapes

Protection of ecosystems, which allows them to keep providing services that are important for adaptation and disaster risk reduction, even beyond the boundaries of the protected area

 

Target 13: By 2020, the genetic diversity of cultivated plants and farmed and domesticated animals and of wild relatives, including other socio economically as well as culturally valuable species, is maintained and strategies have been developed and implemented for minimizing genetic erosion and safeguarding their genetic diversity

Reduces risks of climate change affecting food security and livelihoods

D: Enhance the benefits to all from

biodiversity and ecosystem services

Target 14: By 2020, ecosystems that provide essential services, including services related to water and contribute to health, livelihoods and wellbeing, are restored and safeguarded, taking into account the needs of women, indigenous and local communities and the poor and vulnerable

Ensures provisioning of essential ecosystem services, including those underpinning DRR

 

Target 15: By 2020, ecosystem resilience and the contribution of biodiversity to carbon stocks has been enhanced, through conservation and restoration, including restoration of at least 15% of degraded ecosystems, thereby contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation and to combating desertification

Resilient ecosystems are a key component of DRR, e.g. restoration of coastal vegetated ecosystems contributes to mitigation, adaptation and disaster risk reduction through shoreline stabilization

  1. Source Lo (2016)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chaudhary, S., Adhikari, B.R., Chaudhary, P., Dorji, T., Poudel, R. (2021). Ecosystem-Based Adaptation (EbA) in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: Status, Progress and Challenges. In: Mukherjee, M., Shaw, R. (eds) Ecosystem-Based Disaster and Climate Resilience. Disaster and Risk Research: GADRI Book Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4815-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics