Skip to main content

Assessment and Retrofitting Augmentation Methods of Seismic Performance on Existing RC Buildings Across India

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 175))

  • 604 Accesses

Abstract

One of the major tectonic plates in the world is the Indian tectonic plate bearing an area of 11,900,000 km2. According to the Indian Standard Code of Practice (Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (2016) Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, 6th Revisi., vol. 1893, no. December. New Delhi), 60% of India’s geographical land lies under zones III, IV, and V (Murty, What are the Indian Seismic Codes?, IIT Kanpur. pp. 1–2). India has witnessed major earthquakes from time to time, over the past few decades. Over the period, the seismic performance of the existing buildings was assessed using various assessment methodologies. Diverse retrofit methods were experimented on various concrete components and were implemented on the impacted building elements. This paper talks about a detailed investigation of the failure mechanisms of the various reinforced concrete buildings of four major earthquakes spread across the country. The earthquakes spanning from Gujarat (2001, magnitude—7.7) in West to Sikkim (2011, magnitude—6.9) and Imphal (2016, magnitude—6.7) in North-East to Andaman and Nicobar Islands (2004, magnitude—8.7), the southernmost Union Territory of India, saw a similar failure mechanism in moment resisting reinforced concrete-framed buildings, despite lying on various seismic zones. Few retrofitting techniques that were applied to these deformed buildings are discussed in detail. From summarizing the diverse retrofitting approaches, it is found that the technique of concrete jacketing efficiently increased the performance of the buildings across the nation. It is one of the most suitable and common methods used employing local construction materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (2016) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, 6th revision, vol 1893. New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  2. Murty CVR, What are the Indian seismic codes? IIT Kanpur, pp 1–2. http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/EQTips

  3. Kumar P (2007) The rapid drift of the Indian tectonic plate. Nature 449(7164):894897. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06214

  4. Reddy DV et al (2009) The great 1950 Assam earthquake revisited: field evidences of liquefaction and search for paleoseismic events. Tectonophysics 474(3–4):463472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.04.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tripathi JN (2006) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake recurrence in the January 26, 2001 earthquake region of Gujrat, India. J Seismol 10(1):119130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-005-9004-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wikipedia, 2001 Gujarat earthquake—Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_Gujarat_earthquake. Accessed 09 Dec 2020

  7. Bokey PB, Pajgade PS (2004) Lessons from Jan, 26, 2001 Gujrat (India) Earthquake. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, 2004, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rajendran K (2011) The 18 September 2011, North Sikkim earthquake. JSTOR 101(11):1475–1479

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rai DC, Mondal G, Singhal V, Parool N, Pradhan T (2012) 2011 Sikkim earthquake: effects on building stocks and perspective on growing seismic risk

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaushik HB (2007) Impact of great december 26, 2004 sumatra earthquake and Tsunami on structures inf port blair. J Perform Constr Facil 21(2):128142. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:2(128)

  11. Devi TK, Singh O (2017) A case study on Manipur earthquake Of 4th January 2016. In: Oinam Manoranjan Singh international journal of engineering technology science and research IJETSR, vol 4, no 3. www.ijetsr.com

  12. Gahalaut VK (2016) The 4 January 2016 Manipur earthquake in the Indo-Burmese wedge, an intra-slab event. Geomatics. Nat Hazards Risk 7(5):15061512. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1179686

  13. Rai DC (2017) M 6.7, 4 January 2016 Imphal earthquake: dismal performance of publicly-funded buildings. Curr Sci 113(12):23412350. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v113/i12/2341-2350

  14. Mohapatra AK, Mohanty WK (2010) An overview of seismic zonation studies in India. In: Indian geotechnical conference, 2010, pp 175–178

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prajapati S, Kumar A, Chopra S, Bansal BK, Prajapati SK, Bansal BK (2013) Intensity map of Mw 6.9 2011 Sikkim–Nepal border earthquake and its relationships with PGA: distance and magnitude. Nat Hazards 69:1781–1801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0776-x.

  16. Rai DC et al (2006) The effect of the December 2004 Great Sumatra earthquake and Indian Ocean tsunami on transportation systems in India’s Andaman and Nicobar islands. Earthq Spectra 22(SUPPL 3):561579. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2206809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Raisinghani BM (2016) Influence of parameters on performance evaluation of designed RC buildings: seismic hazard. Int J Struct Eng 7(4):378397. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTRUCTE.2016.079286

  18. Humar JM (2001) Performance of buildings during the 2001 Bhuj earthquake. Can J Civ Eng 28(6):979991. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-28-6-979

  19. Kaushik HB, Jain SK (2006) Performance of buildings in port blair (India) during the great sumatra earthquake of 26 December 2004. In: The 8th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, pp 18–22

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kam WY (2011) Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the 22 February Christchurch (Lyttelton) earthquake. Bull New Zeal Soc Earthq Eng 44(4):239278. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.239-278

  21. Sreerama AK, Ramancharla K (2013) Earthquake behavior of reinforced concrete framed buildings on hill slopes

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pampanin S (2006) Controversial aspects in seismic assessment and retrofit of structures in modern times: understanding and implementing lessons from ancient heritage

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dingorkar P (2016) Retrofitting—Comparative study of RC jacketing and FRP wrapping. Int J Civ Eng Technol 7(5):304–310

    Google Scholar 

  24. Choudhury T (2020) Seismic vulnerability assessment and strengthening of new market building damaged after January 4, 2016, Imphal, India, Earthquake. J Perform Constr Facil 34(2):115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001392

  25. Rani A (2014) Seismic retrofitting of a damaged school building. Int J Res Eng Technol 03(06):495500. https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2014.0306093

  26. Sheth A, Chaudhari RD, Khan E, Gupta D, Saini M (2004) Seismic retrofitting of Mani Mandir complex at Morbi, Gujarat, India. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada, vol 3228, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  27. Paulay T, Priestly MJN (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and Masonry buildings. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bharali R, Deka B, Pathak J (2014) Retrofitting open ground storey building with masonry walls in Guwahati city. In: 15th symposium on earthquake engineering, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (2013) IS 15988: 2013 Seismic evaluation and strengthening of existing reinforced concrete buildings—guidelines, Indian Stand, pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kaliyaperumal G (2009) Seismic retrofit of columns in buildings for flexure using concrete jacket. ISET J Earthq Technol 46(2):77–107

    Google Scholar 

  31. Badari Narayanan VT, Sengupta AK, Satish Kumar SR (2012) Seismic retrofit of beams in buildings for flexure using concrete jacket. ISET J Earthq Technol 49(1–2):1–22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankeeta Karmakar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Karmakar, A. (2022). Assessment and Retrofitting Augmentation Methods of Seismic Performance on Existing RC Buildings Across India. In: Kolathayar, S., Chian, S.C. (eds) Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering . Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 175. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4617-1_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4617-1_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-4616-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-4617-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics