Abstract
The facial morphology of humans, which is very complicated in three dimensions, is closely related to various functions, such as support of the brain and the eyeball and formation of the mastication apparatus and respiratory system. Such a complicated shape is acquired by mid-fetal life. The early stage of this developmental process, the embryonic stage, is closely related to many congenital anomalies. Various studies have been conducted on the morphogenesis of the face during this period. However, specimens in the late stage of facial morphogenesis, the early fetal period, are too large to be sectioned for the histological analysis and have been difficult to study using traditional medical imaging modalities, such as X-rays, because the facial skeleton has not been calcified. The development of medical imaging modalities has allowed us to obtain high-definition images of these early fetal facial skeletons. In addition, geometric morphometrics have enabled us to perform three-dimensional morphological analyses and visualize the growth trait in the early fetal life.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Katsube M, Yamada S, Miyazaki R, Yamaguchi Y, Makishima H, Takakuwa T, et al. Quantitation of nasal development in the early prenatal period using geometric morphometrics and MRI: a new insight into the critical period of Binder phenotype. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37(9):907–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5106.
Katsube M, Yamada S, Yamaguchi Y, Takakuwa T, Yamamoto A, Imai H, et al. Critical growth processes for the midfacial morphogenesis in the early prenatal period. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019;56(8):1026–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665619827189.
Katsube M, Rolfe SM, Bortolussi SR, Yamaguchi Y, Richman JM, Yamada S, et al. Analysis of facial skeletal asymmetry during foetal development using μCT imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019;22(S1):199–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12304.
Goh RCW, Chen YR. Surgical management of Binder’s syndrome: lessons learned. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010;34(6):722–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9533-7.
Holmstrom H. Clinical and pathologic features of maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder’s syndrome): significance of the prenasal fossa on etiology. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;78(5):559–67.
Delaire J, Precious D. Interaction of the development of the nasal septum, the nasal pyramid and the face. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1987;12(3):311–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-5876(87)80007-1.
Grymer LF, Bosch C. The nasal septum and the development of the midface. A longitudinal study of a pair of monozygotic twins. Rhinology. 1997;35(1):6–10.
Keppler-Noreuil KM, Wenzel TJ. Binder phenotype: associated findings and etiologic mechanisms. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(5):1339–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181ef2b71.
Howe AM, Lipson AH, de Silva M, Ouvrier R, Webster WS. Severe cervical dysplasia and nasal cartilage calcification following prenatal warfarin exposure. Am J Med Genet. 1997;71(4):391–6.
Howe AM, Hawkins JK, Webster WS. The growth of the nasal septum in the 6-9 week period of foetal development—Warfarin embryopathy offers a new insight into prenatal facial development. Aust Dental J. 2004;49(4):171–6.
Hall JG, Pauli RM, Wilson KM. Maternal and fetal sequelae of anticoagulation during pregnancy. Am J Med. 1980;68(1):122–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(80)90181-3.
Van Driel D, Wesseling J, Sauer PJJ, Touwen BCL, Van Veer ED, Heymans HSA. Teratogen update: Fetal effects after in utero exposure to coumarins overview of cases, follow-up findings, and pathogenesis. Teratology. 2002;66(3):127–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/tera.10054.
Burdi AR. Cephhalometric growth analyses of the human upper face region during the last two trimesters of gestation. Am J Anat. 1969;125(1):113–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001250106.
Burdi AR. Sagittal growth of the nasomaxillary complex during the second trimester of human prenatal development. J Dent Res. 1965;44:112–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345650440010401.
Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Ital J Zool. 2004;71(1):5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250000409356545.
Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de León MS. Neanderthals and modern humans—chimps and bonobos: similarities and differences. New York: Springer; 2008.
Sahota DS, Leung TY, Leung TN, Chan OK, Lau TK. Fetal crown-rump length and estimation of gestational age in an ethnic Chinese population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(2):157–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6252.
Latham RA. Maxillary development and growth: the septo-premaxillary ligament. J Anat. 1970;107(Pt 3):471–8.
Mooney MP, Siegel MI. Developmental relationship between premaxillary-maxillary suture patency and anterior nasal spine morphology. Cleft Palate J. 1986;23(2):101–7.
Schultz AH. Relation of the external nose to the bony nose and nasal cartilages in whites and negroes. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1918;1(3):329–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330010304.
Park HS. Lambda-shaped implant for augmentation of anterior nasal spine in Asian rhinoplasty as an ancillary procedure. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2001;25(1):8–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002660010086.
Renier D, Lajeunie E, Arnaud E, Marchac D. Management of craniosynostoses. Childs Nerv Syst. 2000;16(10–11):645–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003810000320.
Diewert VM. Development of human craniofacial morphology during the late embryonic and early fetal periods. Am J Orthod. 1985;88(1):64–76.
Johnston LE. A cephalometric investigation of the sagittal growth of the second-trimester fetal face. Anat Rec. 1974;178(3):623–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091780309.
Diewert VM. A morphometric analysis of craniofacial growth and changes in spatial relations during secondary palatal development in human embryos and fetuses. Am J Anat. 1983;167(4):495–522.
Trenouth MJ. Relative growth of the human fetal skull in width, length and height. Archiv Oral Biol. 1991;36(6):451–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(91)90136-I.
Carlson DS. Theories of craniofacial growth in the postgenomic era. Semin Orthod. 2005;11(4):172–83. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2005.07.002.
DeMyer W, Zeman W, Palmer C. The face predicts the brain: diagnostic significance of median facial anomalies for holoprosencephaly (arhinencephaly). Pediatrics. 1964;34:256.
Moss ML, Salentijn L. The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth. Am J Orthod. 1969;55(6):566–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90034-7.
Moss ML. The differential roles of periosteal and capsular functional matrices in orofacial growth. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29(Supplement 1):i96–i101. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjl097.
Moss ML. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 1. The role of mechanotransduction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112(1):8–11.
Humphrey T. Development of oral and facial motor mechanisms in human fetuses and their relation to craniofacial growth. J Dent Res. 1971;50(6):1428–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345710500061301.
Acknowledgments
I acknowledge the contribution of collaborating obstetricians and the members of the Congenital Anomaly Research Center, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine. I would like to express our deepest gratitude to Akinobu Shimizu and Atsushi Saito from Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology for their suggestions and technical support in the preparation of warping the images.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Katsube, M. (2022). Morphometric Analysis for the Morphogenesis of the Craniofacial Structures and the Evolution of the Nasal Protrusion in Humans. In: Hashizume, M. (eds) Multidisciplinary Computational Anatomy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4325-5_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4325-5_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-4324-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-4325-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)