Skip to main content

Reforming Takeuti’s Quantum Set Theory to Satisfy de Morgan’s Laws

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Mathematical Logic (SAML 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 369))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In 1981, Takeuti introduced set theory based on quantum logic by constructing a model analogous to Boolean-valued models for Boolean logic. He defined the quantum logical truth value for every sentence of set theory. He showed that equality axioms do not hold, while axioms of ZFC set theory hold if appropriately modified with the notion of commutators. Here, we consider the problem in Takeuti’s quantum set theory that De Morgan’s laws do not hold for bounded quantifiers. We construct a counter-example to De Morgan’s laws for bounded quantifiers in Takeuti’s quantum set theory. We redefine the truth value for the membership relation and bounded existential quantification to ensure that De Morgan’s laws hold. Then, we show that the truth value of every theorem of ZFC set theory is lower bounded by the commutator of constants therein as quantum transfer principle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bell, J.L.: Set Theory: Boolean-Valued Models and Independence Proofs, 3rd edn. Oxford UP, Oxford (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198568520.001.0001

  2. Birkhoff, G., von Neumann, J.: The logic of quantum mechanics. Ann. Math. 37, 823–843 (1936). https://doi.org/10.2307/1968621

  3. Bruns, G., Kalmbach, G.: Some remarks on free orthomodular lattices. In: Schmidt, J., (ed.), Proceedings of the Lattice Theory Conference, pp. 397–408. Houston, USA (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chevalier, G.: Commutators and decompositions of orthomodular lattices. Order 6, 181–194 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02034335

  5. Hardegree, G.M.: Material implication in orthomodular (and Boolean) lattices. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 22, 163–182 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093883401

  6. Husimi, K.: Studies on the foundation of quantum mechanics I. Proc. Physico-Math. Soc. Japan 19, 766–778 (1937)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalmbach, G.: Orthomodular Lattices. Academic, London (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Marsden, E.L.: The commutator and solvability in a generalized orthomodular lattice. Pacific J. Math 33, 357–361 (1970). https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1970.33.357

  9. Ozawa, M.: Transfer principle in quantum set theory. J. Symb. Log. 72, 625–648 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2178/jsl/1185803627

  10. Ozawa, M.: Quantum set theory extending the standard probabilistic interpretation of quantum theory. New Generat. Comput. 34, 125–152 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-016-0205-2

  11. Ozawa, M.: Operational meanings of orders of observables defined through quantum set theories with different conditionals. In:  Duncan, R., Heunen, C., (eds.) Quantum Physics and Logic (QPL) 2016, EPTCS, vol. 236, pp. 127–144. Open Publishing Association (2017). https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.236.9

  12. Ozawa, M.: Orthomodular-valued models for quantum set theory. Rev. Symb. Log. 10, 782–807 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020317000120

  13. Pulmannová, S.: Commutators in orthomodular lattices. Demonstratio Math. 18, 187–208 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1515/dema-1985-0116

  14. Sasaki, U.: Orthocomplemented lattices satisfying the exchange axiom. J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. A 17, 293–302 (1954)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Takeuti, G.: Quantum set theory. In: Beltrametti, E.G., van Fraassen, B.C., (eds.), Current Issues in Quantum Logic: Proceedings of the Workshop on Quantum Logic, December 2–9, 1979, Erice, Sicily, Italy, pp. 303–322. Plenum, New York (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3228-2_19

  16. Urquhart, A.: Review. J. Symb. Log. 48, 206–208 (1983). https://doi.org/10.2307/2273336

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the support of the JSPS KAKENHI, No. 26247016, No. 17K19970, and the support of the IRI-NU collaboration. The author thanks the referee for calling his attention to the well-definedness of restrictions of quantum sets.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masanao Ozawa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ozawa, M. (2021). Reforming Takeuti’s Quantum Set Theory to Satisfy de Morgan’s Laws. In: Arai, T., Kikuchi, M., Kuroda, S., Okada, M., Yorioka, T. (eds) Advances in Mathematical Logic. SAML 2018. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 369. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4173-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics