Skip to main content

Understanding the Disaster Risk of Human Settlements: Case Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Settlements

Part of the book series: Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements ((ACHS))

  • 372 Accesses

Abstract

Risk from natural disasters is no longer defined as the natural occurrence. This chapter aims to understand the risk of such occurrences by analyzing certain socio-political situations in light of historical data via desk research and secondary analysis. The pressure and release model is adopted as a framework to distinguish the progression of vulnerability and safety. To analyze the data, a review of the literature (i.e., scientific journals, newspapers, and policy papers) is conducted. The analysis examined the historical conditions including physical, social, and political situations in two case research areas: Aceh and Haiti. Comparative research is applied to examine for factors in terms of similarities and differences that may have led to higher disaster risk. Moreover, solutions are presented in dealing with the multiple problems in terms of the progression of safety. The findings revealed that the case research areas suffered worsened impacts due to specific historical situations. Additionally, the progression of safety could be implemented as the solution to decrease the impact of disasters by human-related actions. Hence, the findings could have strong contributions for policy-makers to analyze the triggering factors of disasters as well as decrease the impact of disasters altogether.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tareghian R, Kashefipour SM (2007) Application of fuzzy systems and artificial neural networks for flood forecasting. J Appl Sci 7:3451–3459. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2007.3451.3459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jayawardena AW (2015) Hydro-meteorological disasters: causes, effects and mitigation measures with special reference to early warning with data driven approaches of forecasting. In: Procedia IUTAM. Elsevier B.V., pp 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  3. Walch C (2018) Adaptive governance in the developing world: disaster risk reduction in the State of Odisha, India. Clim Dev 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1442794

  4. UNDRR (2021) Building risk knowledge. In: United Nations official disaster risk reduction https://www.undrr.org/building-risk-knowledge. Accessed 2 Feb 2021

  5. IPCC (2017) AR6 climate change 2021: the physical science basis—IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  6. Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF et al (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen X, Chang CP (2020) The shocks of natural hazards on financial systems. Nat Hazards 105:2327–2359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04402-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin H, Lewis TM, Martin NM (2011) A critical review of haiti earthquake of 2010 : key development problems and focused solutions. In: Eighth annual conference on international institution for infrastructure, renewal and reconstruction. International Institute for Infrastructure, Renewal and Reconstruction, Kumamoto, pp 33–40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bendito A, Barrios E (2016) Convergent agency: encouraging transdisciplinary approaches for effective climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 7:430–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-016-0102-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ndah AB, Odihi JO (2017) A systematic study of disaster risk in Brunei Darussalam and options for vulnerability-based disaster risk reduction. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 8:208–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-017-0125-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sh H (2018) Application of a PAR model for assessing vulnerability to drought hazard in Kondoa District. J Geogr Nat 8:1000232. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0587.1000232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Islam MS, Lim SH (2015) When “Nature” strikes: a sociology of climate change and disaster vulnerabilities in Asia. Nat Cult 10:57–80. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2015.100104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cochard R, Ranamukhaarachchi SL, Shivakoti GP et al (2008) The 2004 tsunami in Aceh and Southern Thailand: a review on coastal ecosystems, wave hazards and vulnerability. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 10:3–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2007.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang F, Miyajima M, Li T et al (2012) Progress of geo-disaster mitigation technology in Asia. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paris R, Wassmer P, Sartohadi J et al (2009) Tsunamis as geomorphic crises: lessons from the December 26, 2004 tsunami in Lhok Nga, West Banda Aceh (Sumatra, Indonesia). Geomorphology 104:59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.05.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Borrero JC (2005) Field data and satellite imagery of tsunami effects in Banda Aceh. Science (80-) 308:1596. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110957

  17. Gaillard JC, Clavé E, Vibert O et al (2008) Ethnic groups’ response to the 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami in Aceh, Indonesia. Nat Hazards 47:17–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9193-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society Publishers, Stony Creek, CT

    Google Scholar 

  19. Awal MA (2015) Vulnerability to disaster: pressure and release model for climate change hazards in Bangladesh. Int J Environ Monit Prot 2:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peduzzi P, Allenbach K, Chatenoux B et al (2005) After the tsunami: rapid environmental assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  21. Laumonier Y, Uryu Y, Stüwe M et al (2010) Eco-floristic sectors and deforestation threats in Sumatra: identifying new conservation area network priorities for ecosystem-based land use planning. Biodivers Conserv 19:1153–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9784-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cochard R (2011) The 2004 tsunami in Aceh and Southern Thailand: coastal ecosystem services, damages and resilience. In: The Tsunami threat-research and technology. IntechOpen, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dahuri R (2006) Pre-and post-tsunami coastal planning and land-use policies and issues in Indonesia. In: Workshop on coastal area planning and management in Asian tsunami-affected countries. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, pp 111–129

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fitzpatrick D (2008) Managing conflict and sustaining recovery: land administration reform in tsunami-affected Aceh. Oxfam International, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  25. Saatcioglu M, Ghobarah A, Nistor I (2005) Effects of the December 26, 2004 Sumatra earthquake and tsunami on physical infrastructure. ISET J Earthq Technol 42:79–94

    Google Scholar 

  26. Masyrafah H, Mckeon JMJA (2008) Post-tsunami aid effectiveness in Aceh. Brookings Global Economy and Development, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  27. UNDP (2006) Local governance in tsunami recovery: lessons learned and emerging principles. United Nations Development Programme, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  28. Syam A, Dirhamsyah M, Priyono J (2010) Institutional and legislative system for disaster management in Aceh: past, present and the future. In: Fifth annual international workshop and expo on Sumatera Tsunami disaster and recovery. Tsunami and Disaster Mitigation Research Center, Banda Aceh, Indonesia, pp 80–83

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sari S (2009) Disaster risk reduction in Banda Aceh. Fourth annual international workshop and expo on Sumatra Tsunami disaster and recovery. Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia, pp 66–70

    Google Scholar 

  30. Meng L, Ampuero J, Sladen A, Rendon H (2012) High-resolution backprojection at regional distance: application to the Haiti M7.0 earthquake and comparisons with finite source studies. J Geophys Res 117:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hou L, Shi P (2011) Haiti 2010 earthquake—how to explain such huge losses? Int J Disaster Risk Sci 2:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-011-0003-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hayes GP, Briggs RW, Sladen A et al (2010) Complex rupture during the 12 January 2010 Haiti earthquake. Nat Geosci 3:800–805. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. IFRC (2015) Haiti earthquake five-year progress report. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  34. Corbett B (2013) Why is Haiti so poor? People to people

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ghachem MW (2012) The old regime and the Haitian revolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Verner D, Egset W (2007) Social resilience and state fragility in Haiti: breaking the conflict-poverty trap. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Risler EA, Kintzle S, Nackreud L (2015) Haiti and the earthquake: examining the experience of psychological stress and trauma. Res Soc Work Pract 25:251–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514530002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Échevin D (2011) Vulnerability and livelihoods before and after the Haiti earthquake. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Herard D (2012) Disaster risk reduction and the action plan for national recovery and the development of Haiti. Florida International University, Miami

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bellerive JM (2010) Haiti earthquake PDNA: assessment of damage, losses, general and sectorial needs. UNEP, Port-au-Prince

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fierro E, Perry C (2010) Preliminary reconnaissance report: 12 January 2010 Haiti earthquake. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, UC Berkeley, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  42. Haiti Red Cross Society (2015) How law and regulation supports disaster risk reduction Haiti case—study report. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jones N (2010) Haiti to improve quake preparedness. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2010.670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Commission E (2016) EU emergency support instrument. European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cohen S (2011) Haiti earthquake January 2010: what actions and policies can the government of Haiti implement to improve emergency management response. San Jose State University, San Jose

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Charles J (2008) Haiti’s lax regulation yields unsafe buildings. McClatchy DC Bur

    Google Scholar 

  47. Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A (2005) Introduction to environmental impact assessment, 3rd edn. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Government of Kenya (2013) Truth, justice and reconciliation report. Government Press, Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  49. Saputra A, Rahardianto T, Revindo MD et al (2017) Seismic vulnerability assessment of residential buildings using logistic regression and geographic information system (GIS) in Pleret Sub District (Yogyakarta, Indonesia). Geoenviron Disasters 4:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-017-0075-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yumarni T, Amaratunga D, Haigh R (2014) Assessing gender vulnerability within post-earthquake reconstruction: case study from Indonesia. Procedia Econ Financ 18:763–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(14)01000-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Koseki J, Yoshimine M, Hara T et al (2007) Damage survey report on May 27, 2006, mid java earthquake, Indonesia. Soils Found 47:973–989. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.47.973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Widyastuti H, Lumantarna E, Sofi M et al (2020) Earthquake vulnerability of port structures in Indonesia. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science. Institute of Physics Publishing, p 012001

    Google Scholar 

  53. Mardiatno D, Handayani T, Susanto D et al (2020) Earthquake vulnerability mapping in the at-risk Opak Fault, Sengon Village, Central Java, Indonesia. E3S Web Conf 200:01002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020001002

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mustofa, I., Cirella, G.T. (2022). Understanding the Disaster Risk of Human Settlements: Case Research. In: Cirella, G.T. (eds) Human Settlements. Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4031-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4031-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-4030-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-4031-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics