Abstract
In response to concerns that university students are not being provided with adequate opportunities to develop the digital skills required for successful study, Monash University Library seized the opportunity to bring currency to our Library skill development programmes by connecting the skills students need for research (i.e. using digital information) to the digital skills needed more broadly for functioning in a digital society. This chapter describes how the Digital Skills Development (DSD) framework was piloted in a pathway programme in the Faculty of Education at Monash University, with a cohort that historically displayed varying degrees of digital capabilities. We describe the library-led initiative that resulted in the development of the DSD framework, and we also describe how the framework informed the development of a workshop delivered to this group of learners. We include findings gained from the skills self-assessment tool that we developed to capture students’ self-perceived confidence and autonomy. We share the learnings gained from the experience and offer recommendations for future application of the DSD in pathway programmes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL]. (2017). Accredited programs list. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/deliver-ite-programs/apl.
Bandaranaike, S., Willison, J. & Monash University Library. (2019, Rev. ed.). Work skill development framework. https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/1719401/WorkSkillsDevt-2019.pdf.
Bennett, S. J., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x.
Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004813.
Duncan-Howell, J. (2012). Digital mismatch: Expectations and realities of digital competency amongst pre-service education students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 827–840. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.819.
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004.
Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Science, 5(4), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05040249.
McLeod, A., & Carabott, K. (2019). Who’s teaching the teachers? Viewing the ICT content of a teaching degree through the eyes of pre-service teachers. In A. Tatnall (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education and information technologies. Springer International Publishing.
Murray, M. C., & Pérez, J. (2014). Unraveling the digital literacy paradox: How higher education fails at the fourth literacy. DigitalCommons@ Kennesaw State University. http://iisit.org/Vol11/IISITv11p085-100Murray0507.pdf.
National Assessment Program (NAP). (2018). NAP Sample Assessment ICT Literacy. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. https://www.nap.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/2017napictlreport_final.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816.
Sánchez, J., Salinas, A., Contreras, D., & Meyer, E. (2011). Does the new digital generation of learners exist? A qualitative study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01069.x.
Smith, L. (2011). Monash University Library and Learning: A New Paradigm for a New Age, Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 42(3), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2011.10722235.
Torres, L., Bandaranaike, S., & Yates, S. (2014). ‘What skills do I have? What skills will I need?’ Building an employability skills profile through an online reflective learning program. In: Proceedings of the WACE 10th International Symposium on Cooperative and Work-Integrated Education. From: WACE 2014: 10th International Symposium on Cooperative and Work-Integrated Education, 2–4 June 2014. Sweden: Trollhattan.
Torres, L., McLeod, A., Yazbeck, B., Rayner, G., Skrbis, M., Yates, S., Dickson, N., & Fulton, H. (2018). Digital skill development framework. https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/1652437/DSD-22.05.20.pdf.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development (M. Lopez-Morillas, Trans.). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79–91). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Willison, J., & O’Regan, K. (2006, 2018). Research skill development framework. https://www.adelaide.edu.au/melt/ua/media/51/rsd-framework.pdf.
Willison, J., & O’Regan, K. (2007). Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: A framework for students becoming researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(4), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701658609.
Willison, J., Sabir, F., & Thomas, J. (2016). Shifting dimensions of autonomy in students’ research and employment. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 430–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1178216.
Willison, J. (2017). The Models of Engaged Learning and Teaching (MELT). Retrieved from https://www.adelaide.edu.au/melt/.
Willison, J. (2020). The models of engaged learning and teaching: Connecting sophisticated thinking from early childhood to PhD. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2683-1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Skill statement | No. of responses, ‘With a little guidance from others’ and ‘With no guidance from others’ (high confidence/ autonomy) Week 1 (%) | No. of responses, ‘With a little guidance from others’ and ‘With no guidance from others’ (high confidence/ autonomy) Week 7 (%) |
1. I am able to identify my purpose for using technology | 65 | 89 |
2. I am able to consider the implications of my digital practices (i.e. e-safety, digital wellbeing, digital profile and footprint) | 65 | 83 |
3. I have the confidence to explore the functionality of a range of digital technology | 52 | 83 |
4. I am curious to explore how digital tools can meet my needs | 59 | 75 |
5. I am able to choose the appropriate digital technology for my needs | 76 | 81 |
6. I am able to work out how to use digital technology unfamiliar to me | 55 | 67.5 |
7. I have the ability to apply a range of digital options/tools to meet my various needs | 62 | 67.5 |
8. I know how to choose digital technology informed by criteria that matches my requirements | 58 | 81 |
9. I am able to reflect on my learning to improve my digital skills | 70 | 75 |
10. I can adapt to a changing digital environment | 71 | 75 |
11. I am able to judge the suitability of the technology I use | 73 | 81 |
12. I am able to transfer my learning to new and unfamiliar digital contexts | 62 | 78 |
13. I can manage myself and others in an online environment | 77 | 86 |
14. I can use digital tools and strategies to organise and manage myself and others | 77 | 78 |
15. I can manage my online identity and digital footprint | 73 | 78 |
16. I can customise digital strategies and systems to suit myself and my team | 52 | 73 |
17. I know when to disconnect from the digital environment | 74 | 59 |
18. I can use digital technology to help me draw conclusions | 65 | 89 |
19. I can solve problems in a digital environment | 64 | 91 |
20. I have the confidence to try new ways of analysing information using digital formats | 59 | 78 |
21. I am aware of visual, sensory, kinaesthetic and psychomotor digital technologies for analysis, i.e. augmented reality | 53 | 70 |
22. I am able to participate in online environments | 84.5 | 91 |
23. I am able to share in online environments | 76 | 94.5 |
24. I can collaborate and co-create with others in a range of digital environments | 70 | 83 |
25. I am aware of e-protocols, my e-safety, digital wellbeing, profile and footprint | 59 | 86 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pilz, S., McLeod, A., Yazbeck, B. (2021). Transforming Practice Through Digital Skills Development. In: Torres, L., Salisbury, F., Yazbeck, B., Karasmanis, S., Pinder, J., Ondracek, C. (eds) Connecting the Library to the Curriculum. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3868-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3868-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3867-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-3868-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)