Skip to main content

Rapid Manufacturing of Biomedical Devices: Process Alternatives, Selection and Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Micro- and Nano-manufacturing Technologies

Abstract

With rapid advancements in the understanding of human physiology, biomedical systems—in particular physical products deployed into medical service—have obtained increasing efficacy and complexity. Therefore, methods used to manufacture such devices have had to be adapted to allow for unconventional geometries, unique material requirements, and fast rates of development and production. Rapid Manufacturing (RM) allows for such characteristics to be implemented in the production process itself by replacing corresponding conventional manufacturing techniques, while also enabling customization of products to allow patient specificity—a crucial characteristic for the successful deployment of numerous types of biomedical devices. RM employs various modern manufacturing techniques, primarily Additive Manufacturing (AM), in conjunction with several allied technologies that complement the necessities and limitations of the novel production methods. With the objective to aid appropriate selection and definition of RM processes, this chapter discusses the application of RM processes to the production of biomedical products, the various constituent manufacturing and allied technologies that enable the same; lists instances of industrial and medical employment of prevalent rapid techniques and also summarizes the implications and challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Global Harmonization Task Force.: Definition of the Terms’ Medical Device’ and ‘In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Medical Device’. Study Group 1 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Norman, J et al.: A new chapter in pharmaceutical manufacturing: 3D-printed drug products. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 108, 39–50 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. FDA, US.: Classify Your Medical Device (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Danish Medicines Agency, Denmark.: Medical Devices (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. US Food and Drug Administration.: Device classification panels (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Busachi, A. et al.: A review of additive manufacturing technology and cost estimation techniques for the defence sector. CIRP J. Manufact. Sci. Technol. 19, 117–128 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chuter, T.A.M., et al.: The transition from custom-made to standardized multibranched thoracoabdominal aortic stent grafts. J. Vascular Surg 54.3, 660–668 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Culler, S.D., Martin, G.M., Swearingen, A.: Comparison of adverse events rates and hospital cost between customized individually made implants and standard off-the-shelf implants for total knee arthroplasty. Arthroplasty Today 3(4), 257–263 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Osman, R.B., et al.: 3D-printing zirconia implants; a dream or a reality? An in-vitro study evaluating the dimensional accuracy, surface topography and mechanical properties of printed zirconia implant and discs. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 75, 521–528 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Solanki, N.G., et al.: Formulation of 3D printed tablet for rapid drug release by fused deposition modeling: screening polymers for drug release, drug-polymer miscibility and printability. J. Pharm. Sci. 107.1, 390–401 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Neves, L.S., et al.: Current approaches and future perspectives on strategies for the development of personalized tissue engineering therapies. Expert Rev. Precision Med. Drug Dev. 1.1, 93–108 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xu, X.W., et al.: STEP-compliant NC research: the search for intelligent CAD/CAPP/CAM/CNC integration. Int. J. Prod. Res. 43.17, 3703–3743 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martins, P.A.F., et al.: Theory of single point incremental forming. CIRP Ann. 57(1), 247–252 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Geiger, M., Vollertsen, F.: The mechanisms of laser forming. CIRP Ann. 42(1), 301–304 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ASTM Committee F42 on Additive Manufacturing Technologies, and ASTM Committee F42 on Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Subcommittee F42. 91 on Terminology. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies. Astm International (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saidi, B., et al.: Experimental and numerical study on force reduction in SPIF by using response surface. In: International Conference Design and Modeling of Mechanical Systems. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aguilera, E., et al.: 3D printing of electro mechanical systems. In: Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gu, J., et al.: The effect of inter-layer cold working and post-deposition heat treatment on porosity in additively manufactured aluminum alloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 230, 26–34 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guo, W. et al.: Laser shock peening of laser additive manufactured Ti6Al4V titanium alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 349, 503–510 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dilip, J.J.S., et al.: Use of friction surfacing for additive manufacturing. Mater. Manuf. Process. 28(2), 189–194 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karunakaran, K.P., et al.: Low cost integration of additive and subtractive processes for hybrid layered manufacturing. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 26(5), 490–499 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, C. et al.: Effect of hot isostatic pressing (HIP) on microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V alloy fabricated by cold spray additive manufacturing. Add. Manuf. 27, 595–605 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reeves, P., Tuck, C., Hague, R.: Additive manufacturing for mass customization. In: Mass Customization, pp. 275–289. Springer, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chhabra, M., Singh, R.: Rapid casting solutions: a review. Rapid Prototyping J. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Karapatis, N.P., Van Griethuysen, J.P.S., Glardon, R.: Direct rapid tooling: a review of current research. Rapid Prototyping J. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lantada, A.D., Pilar, L.M.: Rapid prototyping for biomedical engineering: current capabilities and challenges. Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14, 73–96 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bandyopadhyay, A., et al.: Direct comparison of additively manufactured porous titanium and tantalum implants towards in vivo osseointegration. Addit. Manufact 28, 259–266 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Varga, P., et al.: Novel PLA-CaCO3 composites in additive manufacturing of upper limb casts and orthotics—A feasibility study. Mater. Res. Express 6.4, 045317 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ozan, O., et al.: Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 67.2, 394–401 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kamran, M., Saxena, A.: A comprehensive study on 3D printing technology. MIT Int. J. Mech. Eng. 6(2), 63–69 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mano, J.F., et al.: Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: present status and some moving trends. J. R. Soc. Interface 4(17), 999–1030 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cohen, A., et al.: Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 108.5, 661–666 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Whitley III, D., et al.: In-office fabrication of dental implant surgical guides using desktop stereolithographic printing and implant treatment planning software: a clinical report. J. Prosthet. Dent. 118.3, 256–263 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Patel, D.K., et al.: Highly stretchable and UV curable elastomers for digital light processing based 3D printing. Adv. Mater. 29.15, 1606000 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Aimar, A., Augusto, P., Bernardo, I.: The role of 3D printing in medical applications: a state of the art. J. Healthc. Eng. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibrahim, D., et al.: Dimensional error of selective laser sintering, three-dimensional printing and PolyJet™ models in the reproduction of mandibular anatomy. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 37.3, 167–173 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Alamán, J., et al.: Inkjet printing of functional materials for optical and photonic applications. Materials 9.11, 910 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tanaka, K.S., Lightdale-Miric, N.: Advances in 3D-printed pediatric prostheses for upper extremity differences. JBJS 98(15), 1320–1326 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Larrañeta, E., Juan, D.-R., Dimitrios, A.L.: Additive manufacturing can assist in the fight against COVID-19 and other pandemics and impact on the global supply chain. 3D Printing Addit. Manufac. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Trevisan, F., et al.: Additive manufacturing of titanium alloys in the biomedical field: processes, properties and applications. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 16.2, 57–67 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kaierle, S., et al.: Review on laser deposition welding: from micro to macro. Phys. Procedia 39, 336–345 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Duan, B., Wang, M.: Selective laser sintering and its application in biomedical engineering. MRS Bull. 36(12), 998 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sing, S.L., et al.: Laser and electron‐beam powder‐bed additive manufacturing of metallic implants: a review on processes, materials and designs. J. Orthop. Res. 34.3, 369–385 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ahangar, P., et al.: Current biomedical applications of 3D printing and additive manufacturing. Appl. Sci. 9.8, 1713 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Matsumoto, J.S., et al.: Three-dimensional physical modeling: applications and experience at Mayo Clinic. Radiographics 35.7, 1989–2006 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hong, D., et al.: Binder-jetting 3D printing and alloy development of new biodegradable Fe-Mn-Ca/Mg alloys. Acta Biomater. 45, 375–386 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Webb, P.A.: A review of rapid prototyping (RP) techniques in the medical and biomedical sector. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 24(4), 149–153 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Auricchio, F., Marconi, S.: 3D printing: clinical applications in orthopaedics and traumatology. EFORT Open Rev. 1(5), 121–127 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mueller, B., Kochan, D.: Laminated object manufacturing for rapid tooling and patternmaking in foundry industry. Comput. Ind. 39(1), 47–53 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Dhavalikar P., Lan, Z., Kar, R., Salhadar, K., Gaharwar, A.K., Cosgriff-Hernandez E. In: Wagner, W.R., Sakiyama-Elbert, S.E., Zhang, G., Yaszemski, M.J. (eds.) 1.4.8—Biomedical Applications of Additive Manufacturing, Biomaterials Science (Fourth Edition). Academic Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Bogue, R.: 3D printing: the dawn of a new era in manufacturing? Assembly Autom. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bose, S., Vahabzadeh, S., Bandyopadhyay, A.: Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater. Today 16(12), 496–504 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Pires, I., et al.: Characterization of sintered hydroxyapatite samples produced by 3D printing. Rapid Prototyping J. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Vasireddi, R., Bikramjit, B.: Conceptual design of three-dimensional scaffolds of powder-based materials for bone tissue engineering applications. Rapid Prototyping J. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yan, Q., et al.: A review of 3D printing technology for medical applications. Engineering 4.5, 729–742 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Shahrubudin, N., et al.: Challenges of 3D printing technology for manufacturing biomedical products: a case study of Malaysian manufacturing firms. Heliyon 6.4, e03734 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sandström, C.: Adopting 3D printing for manufacturing—The case of the hearing aid industry. Ratio Working Pap. 262, 1–20 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sturm, L.D., et al.: Cyber-physical vulnerabilities in additive manufacturing systems: a case study attack on the. STL file with human subjects. J. Manufac. Syst. 44, 154–164 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Pavlovich, M.J., Hunsberger, J., Atala, A.: Biofabrication: a secret weapon to advance manufacturing, economies, and healthcare. Trends Biotechnol. 34(9), 679–680 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Emelogu, A., et al.: Additive manufacturing of biomedical implants: a feasibility assessment via supply-chain cost analysis. Addit. Manufac. 11, 97–113 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Walker, D.A., Hedrick, J.L., Mirkin, C.A.: Rapid, large-volume, thermally controlled 3D printing using a mobile liquid interface. Science 366(6463), 360–364 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kelly, B., et al.: Computed axial lithography (CAL): toward single step 3D printing of arbitrary geometries. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.05893 (2017)

  63. Raimondi, M.T., et al.: Two-photon laser polymerization: from fundamentals to biomedical application in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 10.1, 56–66 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Prenen, A.M., et al.: Monodisperse, polymeric nano‐and microsieves produced with interference holography. Adv. Mater. 21.17, 1751–1755 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Yeong, W.Y., et al.: Porous polycaprolactone scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering fabricated by selective laser sintering. Acta Biomater. 6(6), 2028–2034 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Von Zeppelin, D., Manka, M.: ARBURG plastic freeforming. Eng. Biomater. 20.143, spec. iss (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sajan Kapil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jhunjhunwala, S., Kapil, S. (2022). Rapid Manufacturing of Biomedical Devices: Process Alternatives, Selection and Planning. In: Joshi, S.N., Chandra, P. (eds) Advanced Micro- and Nano-manufacturing Technologies. Materials Horizons: From Nature to Nanomaterials. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3645-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3645-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3644-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-3645-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics