Skip to main content

The Perceived Value Scale Development for Recycled C&D Waste Products

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (CRIOCM 2020)
  • 1637 Accesses

Abstract

The issue of construction and demolition (C&D) waste is getting more and more serious with the rapid development of urbanization in China. Recycled C&D waste products are applied widely by stakeholders as one of effective ways to solve the problem. At present, the promotion of recycled products is facing heavy barriers, while the future market for recycled products largely depends upon stakeholders’ perceived value. But few studies focus on constructing scales to measure stakeholders’ perceived value of recycled products. To fill this gap, this paper develops a three-dimensional perceived value scale including social value, economic value and environmental value. A questionnaire survey was conducted to collect data from Shenzhen, China. In total, 129 valid questionnaires were divided into two samples with which an exploratory factor analysis and a confirmatory factor analysis were conducted respectively to verify the scale validity and reliability. Results showed that the developed scale has sound reliability and validity. The developed scale provides a new instrument for future construction and demolition waste management research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wu, Z., Yu, A. T. W., & Shen, L. (2017). Investigating the determinants of contractor’s construction and demolition waste management behavior in Mainland China. Waste Management, 60, 290–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolden. (2013). Utilization of recycled and waste materials in various construction applications. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 9(1), 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu, H. Y., Yuan, H. P., Wang, J. Y., Ouyang, L., & Li, Z. D. (2017). An investigation of demolition waste management: Case of Shenzhen in China. In Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (pp. 1157–1167).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parasuraman, A. (1997). Reflections on gaining competitive advantage through customer value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Petrick, J. F. (2002). Development of a multi-dimensional scale for measuring the perceived value of a service. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(2), 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value—A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., & Choi, M. (2016). User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 256–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miao, R., Xu, F. S., Zhang, K., & Jiang, Z. B. (2014). Development of a multi-scale model for customer perceived value of electric vehicles. International Journal of Production Research, 52(16), 4820–4834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dedeoğlu, B. B. (2019). Shaping tourists’ destination quality perception and loyalty through destination country image: The importance of involvement and perceived value. Tourism Management Perspectives, 29, 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pandža Bajs, I. (2013). Tourist perceived value, relationship to satisfaction, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Travel Research, 54(1), 122–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peng, L., Zhang, W., Wang, X., & Liang, S. (2019). Moderating effects of time pressure on the relationship between perceived value and purchase intention in social E-commerce sales promotion: Considering the impact of product involvement. Information & Management, 56(2), 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu, J., Lee, H., Ha, I., & Zo, H. (2017). User acceptance of media tablets: An empirical examination of perceived value. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 206–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng, Y.-H., & Tseng, W.-C. (2016). Exploring the effects of perceived values, free bus transfer, and penalties on intermodal metro–bus transfer users’ intention. Transport Policy, 47, 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hsu, C.-L., & Lin, J.C.-C. (2016). Effect of perceived value and social influences on mobile app stickiness and in-app purchase intention. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 108, 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. He, K., Zhang, J., Wang, A., & Chang, H. (2020). Rural households’ perceived value of energy utilization of crop residues: A case study from China. Renewable Energy, 155, 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Biasutti, M., & Frate, S. (2016). A validity and reliability study of the Attitudes toward Sustainable Development scale. Environmental Education Research, 23(2), 214–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tam, V. W. Y. (2008). Economic comparison of concrete recycling: A case study approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(5), 821–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vieira, C. S., & Pereira, P. M. (2015). Use of recycled construction and demolition materials in geotechnical applications: A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 103, 192–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lai, Y.-Y., Yeh, L.-H., Chen, P.-F., Sung, P.-H., & Lee, Y.-M. (2016). Management and Recycling of Construction Waste in Taiwan. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 35, 723–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gilbert, A., & Churchill, J. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen, S.-C., & Lin, C.-P. (2015). The impact of customer experience and perceived value on sustainable social relationship in blogs: An empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, 40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No.71974132), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2018A0303130037), Shenzhen Government Nature Science Foundation (Grant No. JCYJ20190808115809385).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhikun Ding .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nie, W., Ding, Z. (2021). The Perceived Value Scale Development for Recycled C&D Waste Products. In: Lu, X., Zhang, Z., Lu, W., Peng, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. CRIOCM 2020. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3587-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics