Abstract
Since the economic reform in 1978, China has undergone rapid economic development. From the late 1980s to early 1990s, the first tide of migrant workers appeared in China. An increasing number of migrant workers left their hometowns to seek jobs in another place. Housing is a common challenge for migrant workers in their working destinations. Housing choices of migrant workers have been widely investigated, albeit from the static perspective. Few studies have looked into the housing pathways of migrant workers, or their housing choices from a dynamic point of view. Housing pathway is the result of interactions between social practices of households and housing over time and space. This paper explores the housing pathways of migrant workers and its determinants from three aspects, i.e., housing tenure, housing size, and housing quality. Data from CFPS 2014 and CFPS 2016 are employed. Multiple logistic regression is used. The results show that socio-economic characteristics, mobility characteristics, and life course affects the housing pathways of migrant workers significantly. However, the effects of the above-mentioned factors on housing tenure, housing size, and housing quality of migrant workers are different. Compared with migrant workers in the Western region, migrant workers in the other two regions (i.e., the Eastern region, and the Central region) are less likely to obtain full homeownership, but more likely to improve housing quality during migration. Unemployed migrant workers or those who drop out of the labor market have higher possibilities of losing homeownership. They are also more likely to reduce the housing size. On the other hand, migrant workers who are getting married are prone to increase the housing size. The old generation and the migrant workers who have larger family sizes and longer durations of migration are more likely to have housing sizes unchanged. Moreover, the housing qualities of migrant workers who maintain the status of unemployment tend to remain unchanged. It is also true for migrant workers with larger family sizes. Based on the empirical results, the government is suggested to provide more employment information, job training, and job opportunities for migrant workers who are at disadvantages in housing. At the regional level, it is better for local governments to promulgate preferential housing policies for migrant workers in economically developed areas, such as widening the coverage of public housing, and encouraging employers to provide accommodations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrew, P., & Richard, D. (1985). The longitudinal analysis of housing careers. Journal of Regional Science, 25(1), 85–101.
Clapham, D. (2002). Housing pathways: A post modern analytical framework. Housing, Theory and Society, 19(2), 57–68.
Clark, W. A. V., Deurloo, M. C., & Dieleman, F. M. (2003). Housing careers in the United States, 1968–93: Modelling the sequencing of housing states. Urban Studies, 40(1), 143–160.
Clark, W. A. V., Deurloo, M. C., & Dieleman, F. M. (1994). Tenure changes in the context of micro-level family and macro-level economic shifts. Urban Studies, 31, 131–154.
Clark, W. A., & Huang, Y. Q. (2003). The life course and residential mobility in British housing markets. Environment and Planning A, 35, 323–339.
Eskelä, E. (2017). Housing pathways of skilled migrants: Indian professionals in Helsinki, Finland. Housing, Theory and Society.
Fang, Y. P., & Zhang, Z. X. (2016). Migrant household homeownership outcomes in large Chinese cities—The sustained impact of Hukou. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57(2), 203–227.
Follain, J. R., Jr., Lim, G. C., & Renaud, B. (1982). Housing crowding in developing countries and willingness to pay for additional space, the case of Korea. Journal of Development Economics, 11, 249–272.
Fiadzo, E. D., Houston, J. E., & Godwin, D. D. (2001). Estimating housing quality for poverty and development policy analysis: CWIQ in Ghana. Social Indicators Research, 53(2), 137–162.
Hazel, M. J., & Mary, W. (2005). The housing ladder, the housing life-cycle and the housing life-course: Upward and downward movement among repeat home-buyers in a US metropolitan housing market. Urban Studies, 42(10), 1739–1754.
Hartman, Y., & Darab, S. (2017). The housing pathways of single older non-home owning women in a rural region of Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 234–243.
Huang, Y. Q., & Clark, W. A. V. (2002). Housing tenure choice in transitional urban China: A multilevel analysis. Urban Studies, 39(1), 7–32.
Huang, Y. Q. (2003). A room of one’s own: Housing consumption and residential crowding in transitional urban China. Environment and Planning A, 35, 591–614.
Feng, C. C., Li, T. J., Cao, G. Z., & Shen, H. J. (2017). Housing outcomes of family migrants at the place of destination. Geographical Research, 36(04), 633–646.
Kurian, S. M., & Thampuran, A. (2011). Assessment of housing quality. Institute of Town Planners. India Journal, 8(2), 74–85.
Li, S. M., & Li, L. M. (2006). Life course and housing tenure change in urban China: A study of Guangzhou. Housing Studies, 21(5), 653–670.
Liu, Z. L., Wang, Y. J., & Tao, R. (2013). Social capital and migrant housing experiences in urban China: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Housing Studies, 28(8), 1155–1174.
Long, C. H., & Chen, P. (2016). On the factors influencing housing choice of the new generation of migrant workers: An empirical test based on CGSS data. Journal of East China Normal University, 48(04), 46–54+168–169.
Mackie, P. K. (2012). Housing pathways of disabled young people: Evidence for policy and practice. Housing Studies, 27(6), 805–821.
Niu, G., & Zhao, G. C. (2018). Living condition among China’s rural–urban migrants: Recent dynamics and the inland–coastal differential. Housing Studies, 33(3), 476–493.
Skobba, K. (2016). Exploring the housing pathways of low-income women: A biographical approach. Housing, Theory and Society, 33(1), 41–58.
Song, J. (2010). Moving purchase and sitting purchase: Housing reform and transition to homeownership in Beijing. Housing Studies, 25(6), 903–919.
Sengupta, U., & Tipple, A. G. (2007). The performance of public-sector housing in Kolkata, India, in the post reform milieu. Urban Studies, 44(10), 2009–2027.
Tao, L., Eddie, C. M. H., Francis, K. W. W., & Chen, T. T. (2015). Housing choices of migrant workers in China: Beyond the Hukou perspective. Habitat International, 49, 474–483.
Tomaszewski, W., Smith, J. F., Parsell, C., Tranter, B., Booÿ, J. L., & Skrbiš, Z. (2017). Young, anchored and free? Examining the dynamics of early housing pathways in Australia. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(7), 904–926.
Wiesel, I. (2014). Mobilities of disadvantage: The housing pathways of low-income Australians. Urban Studies, 51(2), 319–334.
Wu, L. L., & Zhang, W. (2018). Rural migrants’ homeownership in Chinese urban destinations: Do institutional arrangements still matter after Hukou reform? Cities, 79, 151–158.
Wang, Y. J., Yang, W. H., & Liu, Z. L. (2014). Determinants of changes in housing sources for migrant Workers in urban China: An empirical study based on a twelve-city migrant survey. Population Research, 38(04), 63–74.
Wang, Z. M., & Wang, S. (2018). Social integration and evolution of urban immigrants in China from the perspective of housing pathways. The World of Survey and Research, 50–56.
Xiao, Z. H., & Xu, S. Y. (2017). Floating population and social integration: Theory, index and method. Social Science Academic Press.
Zhu, X. B., Tan, S. K., Wang, S. L., & Li, Y. (2015). Housing choice of migrant population in China: Facts and explanation. South China Population, 30(03), 35–44.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71804105) and the Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (No. 18YJC630160).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, R., Tao, L. (2021). Determinants of Migrant Workers’ Housing Pathways: Evidence from China. In: Lu, X., Zhang, Z., Lu, W., Peng, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. CRIOCM 2020. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3587-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3587-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3586-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-3587-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)