Skip to main content

Structural Change in the Exports and Foreign Direct Investment of the Southeast Gulf Mexican States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
NAFTA’s Impact on Mexico’s Regional Development

Abstract

It is commonly stated that NAFTA has only beneficiated northern states in Mexico, with no absolute gain for the south region of Mexico. In this research, a combination of econometric and multi-sectoral techniques is employed to show this is probably not true. A structural break in manufacturing exports and foreign direct investment is found in the Southeast Gulf of Mexico, which encompass the states of Veracruz, Tabasco, Campeche, Quintana Roo, and Yucatán, most likely caused by those major liberalization reforms. Manufacturing exports might increase by 48.3% of pre-NAFTA levels, whereas FDI rose by 71.6%. The increment in manufacturing exports is linked to a rise of 1.0% in gross value added and 1.7% in employment of the region. Meanwhile, FDI expansion likely contributed with an additional increment of value added and employment of 1%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The simple location quotient is defined as the ratio of the share of the activity in the region and the share in the nation, if it is larger than one, then it is evidence that the region is more specialized in that activity.

  2. 2.

    The coefficient of Gini takes the values of 0 to 1, 0 is all activities have the same weight and 1 when one activity produces all the region output. On the other hand, the IHH is an index of concentration, it takes the value of 0 if total region output is produced by a very large amount of activities, and 10,000 when is produced by just one activity.

  3. 3.

    A note of caution is pertinent. Indeed, the econometric approach employed in this exercise allows us to identify a structural change in the variables of interest, the likely period delimiting both regimens and gives us an estimate of the probable impact (i.e., difference between the regimens); however, it does not test formally for a specific cause of the structural change. In this chapter we address the structural change as a consequence of the trade and foreign liberalization measures adopted at the light of NAFTA and other commercial agreements, but also other major reforms were undertaking in those years in agriculture, finance, telecommunications, and competence. Moreover, a major world recession occurred in the second regime years, probably underestimating the difference between regimens.

  4. 4.

    The SAM in its disaggregated format is available upon express request to the authors.

References

  • Ayala E, Chapa J (2019) Efectos del declive de la producción petrolera en la región Golfo-Sureste: Un Análisis con la Matriz de Contabilidad Social. In: Dávila A (ed) Modelos económicos de las regiones de México. Miguel Angel Porrúa, México, pp 213–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala E, Chapa J, Treviño L (2015a) Modelo interregional de insumo producto de la región Golfo-Sureste. In: Dávila A (ed) Modelos interregionales de insumo producto de la economía mexicana. MA Porrúa, México, pp 61–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala E, Chapa J, Treviño L (2015b) Análisis estructural de la región petrolera del Golfo-Sureste de México, en un contexto interregional. Equilibrio Económico 11(2):135–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala E, Chapa J, Treviño L, Genna G, Peréz F (2015c) Efectos regionales del libre comercio. In: El caso del noreste de México. Pearson, Ciudad de México

    Google Scholar 

  • Centro de Investigaciones Económicas (2021) Determinantes de la competitividad del estado de Nuevo León. Facultad de Economía, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey. forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapa J (2003) Análisis de la apertura comercial en México mediante modelos multisectoriales, 1970–1993. Universitat de Barcelona, España, Tesis de doctorado. http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/handle/2445/43021

    Google Scholar 

  • Dávila A (2019) Modelos económicos multisectoriales elaborados con matrices de contabilidad social. In: Dávila A (ed) Modelos económicos de las regiones de México. Miguel Angel Porrúa, México, pp 7–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Defourny J, Thorbecke E (1984) Structural path analysis and multiplier decomposition within a social accounting matrix framework. Econ J 94(373):111–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francois J, Shiells C (1994) Modeling trade policy: applied general equilibrium assessments of north American free trade. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pyatt G, Round J (1979) Accounting and fixed Price multipliers in a social accounting matrix framework. Econ J 89(356):850–873. https://doi.org/10.2307/2231503

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edgardo Arturo Ayala Gaytán .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ayala Gaytán, E.A., Chapa Cantú, J.C. (2021). Structural Change in the Exports and Foreign Direct Investment of the Southeast Gulf Mexican States. In: de León-Arias, A., Aroca, P. (eds) NAFTA’s Impact on Mexico’s Regional Development. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 51. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3168-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics