Skip to main content

Numerical Comparison of Elliptical and Conical Cavity Receiver of Solar Parabolic Dish Collector System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Mechanical and Materials Technology (EMSME 2020)

Abstract

The solar parabolic dish collector system is ace of the concentrated solar power technologies. It attracts researchers all around the globe because of its higher thermal conversion efficiency. The cavity receivers play a major role in bettering the overall solar collector efficiency by reducing the heat losses. With minimum heat losses, the employment of the concentrated power increases. This current study compares two types of cavity receivers such as elliptical and conical through numerical simulations and determines the heat loss coefficient. The combinations of various parameters such as temperature (673 K, 773 K, 873 K, 973 K, and 1073 K), orientation (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°), and aspect ratio (1.5, 1.75, 2.0, 2.25, 2.5) of the cavity receivers were considered for the simulation. The conical cavity receiver has less heat loss coefficient than the elliptical cavity receiver. Among the different combinations of parameters, the heat loss at 0° inclination of conical cavity receiver is 31% less than at 90° for 673 K and others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sukhatme SP, Nayak JK (2017) Solar energy, 4th edn., vol 38. McGraw Hill, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harris JA, Lenz TG (1985) Thermal performance of solar concentrator/cavity receiver systems. Sol Energy 34(2):135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Steinfeld A, Schubnell M (1993) Optimum aperture size and operating temperature of a solar cavity-receiver. Sol Energy 50(1):19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Taumoefolau T, Paitoonsurikarn S, Hughes G, Lovegrove K (2004) Experimental investigation of natural convection heat loss from a model solar concentrator cavity receiver. J Sol Energy Eng 126(2):801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Reddy KS, Sendhil Kumar N (2008) Combined laminar natural convection and surface radiation heat transfer in a modified cavity receiver of solar parabolic dish. Int J Therm Sci 47(12):1647–1657

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sendhil Kumar N, Reddy KS (2008) Comparison of receivers for solar dish collector system. Energy Convers Manag 49(4):812–819

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mawire A, Taole SH (2014) Experimental energy and exergy performance of a solar receiver for a domestic parabolic dish concentrator for teaching purposes. Energy Sustain Dev 19(1):162–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang W, Xu H, Laumert B, Strand T (2014) An inverse design method for a cavity receiver used in solar dish Brayton system. Sol Energy 110:745–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Affandi R, Ghani MRA, Ghan CK, Pheng LG (2015) The impact of the solar irradiation, collector and the receiver to the receiver losses in parabolic dish system. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 195:2382–2390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang W, Ragnolo G, Aichmayer L, Strand T, Laumert B (2015) Integrated design of a hybrid gas turbine-receiver unit for a solar dish system. Energy Procedia 69:583–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu G et al (2015) Design and characteristics of a novel tapered tube bundle receiver for high-temperature solar dish system. Appl Therm Eng 91:791–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu J, Wang K, Wu H, Wang D, Du J, Olabi AG (2015) Experimental investigation on the energy and exergy performance of a coiled tube solar receiver. Appl Energy 156:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Daabo AM, Mahmoud S, Al-Dadah RK (2016) The optical efficiency of three different geometries of a small scale cavity receiver for concentrated solar applications. Appl Energy 179

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daabo AM, Mahmoud S, Al-Dadah RK (2016) The effect of receiver geometry on the optical performance of a small-scale solar cavity receiver for parabolic dish applications. Energy 114:513–525

    Google Scholar 

  15. Loni R, Kasaeian AB, Mahian O, Sahin AZ (2016) Thermodynamic analysis of an organic rankine cycle using a tubular solar cavity receiver. Energy Convers Manag 127:494–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang S, Wang J, Lund PD, Wang S, Jiang C (2018) Reducing convective heat losses in solar dish cavity receivers through a modified air-curtain system. Sol Energy 166:50–58

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abuseada M, Ozalp N, Ophoff C (2019) Numerical and experimental investigation of heat transfer in a solar receiver with a variable aperture. Int J Heat Mass Transf 128:125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sendhil Kumar Natarajan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tharun, M., Navin, S.R., Arjun Singh, K., Sampathkumar, A., Natarajan, S.K. (2022). Numerical Comparison of Elliptical and Conical Cavity Receiver of Solar Parabolic Dish Collector System. In: Govindan, K., Kumar, H., Yadav, S. (eds) Advances in Mechanical and Materials Technology . EMSME 2020. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2794-1_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2794-1_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2793-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2794-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics