Abstract
The purpose of this study was threefold. First, a thorough review of models related to ESD competencies was completed. Second, the study developed and conducted a prospective science teachers’ course (“Elementary Science Education Methodology Development”) that targets Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) based on Lesson Study methodology. And third, the study evaluated the course’s merits and values based on the process of students’ understanding of science lessons. Stufflebeam’s (2003) Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model guided the development and assessment of this two-month course for third-year undergraduate students in the university’s science education department. When conducting a trial of the course, diverse evidence was acquired that suggests it promoted students’ understanding of and a capacity to accomplish, what science teachers should do in order to teach science lessons incorporating ESD. Consequently, this trial empirically identified essential competencies that are found as key components to the domains “Facilitate Learning” and “Continue to Learn and Create” located in the study’s draft version of an Asia-Pacific ESD Teacher Competency Framework.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A rigorous sequential process for developing a lesson plan collaboratively with colleagues.
References
Bertschy, F., Künzli, C., & Lehmann, M. (2013). Teachers’ competencies for the implementation of educational offers in the field of education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 5, 5067–5080.
Fujii, H., & Ogawa, H. (2016). Innovative lesson plans in chemistry education for broadening sustainable society. In M. Chiu (Ed.), Science education research and practice in Asia (pp. 385–407). Singapore: Springer.
Kater-Wettstädt, L., Bruhn, K., Bürgener, L., & Barth, M. (2019). Implementing education for sustainable development in teacher education. Case studies from Germany. In S. Lahiri (Eds.), Exploring environmental education for teachers (pp. 11–29). New Delhi: Studera Press.
Nozawa, Y. (2012). The significance of CIPP model in curriculum evaluation: Focusing on the role of giving information to decision making. Comparative Education (Bulletin of the Japan Comparative Education Society), 45, 137–156. [in Japanese]
Okayama University. (2019). Report on the project “Teacher Education for ESD in the Asia-Pacific Region.” Outputs of the Asia-Pacific Regional Meeting on Teacher Education for ESD: Towards Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals through Education. Okayama: Okayama University.
Rauch, F., Streissler, A., & Steiner, R. (2008). Kompetenzen für Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung (KOM-BiNE). Konzept und Anregungen für die Praxis. Wien: BMUKK.
Shinkosyuppansya Keirinkan. (2015). ESD practices for children broadening future society: Let’s link between science and ESD!. Osaka: Shinkosyuppansya Keirinkan. [in Japanese]
Sleurs, W. (Eds.) (2008). Competencies for ESD (Education for Sustainable Development) teachers. A framework to integrate ESD in the curriculum of teacher training institutes. Brussels: Comenius 2.1 Project.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam & L. A. Wingate (Eds.), International handbook for educational evaluation. Part one: Perspectives (pp. 31–62). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, & applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
UNECE. (2012). Learning for the future. Competences in education for sustainable development. Geneva: UNECE.
UNESCO. (2010). Education for sustainable development lens: A policy and practice review tool. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2018). Integrating Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in teacher education in South-East Asia: A guide for teacher educators. Paris: UNESCO.
Yutani, M., & Fujii, H. (2014). ESD practices linked comprehensive learning and subjects’ learning: Focus on utilizing “ESD calendar”. The Bulletin of Japanese Curriculum Research and Development, 36(4), 111–114. [in Japanese]
Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Grifth, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., et al. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57–84.
Acknowledgements
The work described in this chapter was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Core-to-Core Program, B. Asia-Africa Science Platform. The author gratefully acknowledges the collaboration of Shinichiro Yasuhara and Kosaku Kawasaki in developing the “Elementary Science Education Methodology Development” course.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fujii, H. (2021). Towards the Identification of ESD Competencies Required for Pre-service Science Teachers. In: Isozaki, T., Sumida, M. (eds) Science Education Research and Practice from Japan. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2746-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2746-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2745-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2746-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)