Skip to main content

Disease Detection and Prediction Using the Liver Function Test Data: A Review of Machine Learning Algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1388))

Abstract

In the last decade, there has been an admirable improvement in the classification accuracy of various machine learning techniques used for disease diagnosis. This even aids in finding the associations and patterns in the data, which helps in the construction of prediction model. Diagnosing illness by considering the features that have the maximum impact on recognition is important to control the disease. The main objective of this research paper is to provide a summarized review of literature with comparative results, which has been done for the detection and prediction of liver diseases with various machine learning algorithms using the liver function test data in order to make the analytical conclusions. From this study, it is observed that the CMAC, RBF, PSO-LS-SVM and ADTree improve the accuracy of liver disease detection and prediction. A review of past findings on the LFT data and its association with diabetes prediction is also studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. P. Sharma, et al., Diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using modified grey wolf optimization. Cogn. Syst. Res. 54, 100–115 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Ashraf, et al., Prediction of cardiovascular disease through cutting-edge deep learning technologies: an empirical study based on TENSORFLOW, PYTORCH and KERAS, in International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications (Springer, Singapore, 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.A. Alzubi, et al., Efficient approaches for prediction of brain tumor using machine learning techniques. Indian J. Public Health Res. Dev. 10(2), 267–272 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Ashraf, M. Zaman, M. Ahmed, An intelligent prediction system for educational data mining based on ensemble and filtering approaches. Procedia Comput. Sci. 167, 1471–1483 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Ashraf, Z. Majid, A. Muheet, To ameliorate classification accuracy using ensemble vote approach and base classifiers, in Emerging Technologies in Data Mining and Information Security (Springer, Singapore, 2019), pp. 321–334

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Ashraf, Z. Majid, A. Muheet, Performance analysis and different subject combinations: An empirical and analytical discourse of educational data mining, in 2018 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence) (IEEE, 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Ashraf, M. Zaman, M. Ahmed, Using Ensemble StackingC method and base classifiers to ameliorate prediction accuracy of pedagogical data. Procedia Comput. Sci. 132, 1021–1040 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Mohd, A.B. Muheet, Z.B. Majid, GWLM–NARX. Data Technol. Appl. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Mohd, A.B. Muheet, Z.B. Majid Zaman Baba.SALM-NARX: Self Adaptive LM-based NARX model for the prediction of rainfall, in 2018 2nd International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC) I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC), 2018 2nd International Conference on. IEEE, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Z. Majid, K. Sameer, A. Muheet, Analytical comparison between the information gain and Gini index using historical geographical data‖ (IJACSA) Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 11(5), 429–440 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Zaman, S.M.K. Quadri, A.B. Muheet, information translation: a practitioners approach.Proc. World Congr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 1 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Omar, Deep learning-based intrusion detection model for industrial wireless sensor networks. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. (2020), In press

    Google Scholar 

  13. N.M. Mir, et al., An experimental evaluation of bayesian classifiers applied to intrusion detection. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9(12), 1–7 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Zhao, X. Huichun, A different perspective for management of diabetes mellitus: controlling viral liver diseases. J. Diabetes Res. 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.J. McLernon, et al., The utility of liver function tests for mortality prediction within one year in primary care using the algorithm for liver function investigations (ALFI). PLoS One 7(12), e50965 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Kalaiselvi, G.M. Nasira, A new approach for diagnosis of diabetes and prediction of cancer using ANFIS, In 2014 World Congress on Computing and Communication Technologies (IEEE, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Sontakke, L. Jay, D. Reshul, Diagnosis of liver diseases using machine learning, in 2017 International Conference on Emerging Trends & Innovation in ICT (ICEI) (IEEE, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Jain, et al., Incidence and risk factors for mortality in patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation. Indian J. Transplant. 13(3), 210 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Ifra, A.B. Muheet, Z. Majid, S. Jahangir Sidiq,A comparative study of various data mining algorithms for effective liver disease diagnosis a decade review from 2010 to 2019. 6(1), 980–995 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Diseases and Conditions, Apollo Hospitals, https://www.apollohospitals.com/patient-care/health-and-lifestyle/diseases-and-conditions

  21. A. Koch, Schiff’s diseases of the liver—10th edition. J. Am. Coll. Surg. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. MedlinePlus, U.S. National Library of Medicine, https://medlineplus.gov/lab-tests/liver-function-tests/

  23. Liver Function Test, https://www.webmd.com/hepatitis/liver-function-test-lft

  24. Y. Zhao, et al., Management of diabetes mellitus in patients with chronic liver diseases. J. Diabetes Res. 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. The Hidden Risk of Liver Disease From Diabetes, WebMD, https://www.webmd.com/diabetes/diabetes-liver-disease-hidden-risk

  26. S. Wild, et al., Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 27(5), 1047–1053 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Melli, A Lazy Model-Based Approach to On-Line Classification (Simon Fraser University, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  28. P.D. Turney, Cost-sensitive classification: Empirical evaluation of a hybrid genetic decision tree induction algorithm. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 2, 369–409 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  29. N. Ye, X. Li, A scalable, incremental learning algorithm for classification problems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 43(4), 677–692 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. L. Ozyilmaz, Y. Tulay, Artificial neural networks for diagnosis of hepatitis disease, in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 1 ( IEEE, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Z.-H. Zhou, Y. Jiang, NeC4. 5: neural ensemble based C4. 5. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 16(6), 770–773 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. K. Revett, et al., Mining a primary biliary cirrhosis dataset using rough sets and a probabilistic neural network, in 2006 3rd International IEEE Conference Intelligent Systems (IEEE, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. E. Comak, et al., A new medical decision making system: least square support vector machine (LSSVM) with fuzzy weighting pre-processing. Expert. Syst. Appl. 32(2), 409–414 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  34. M. Neshat, et al., Fuzzy expert system design for diagnosis of liver disorders, in 2008 International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling (IEEE, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Rouhani, M. Motavalli Haghighi, The diagnosis of hepatitis diseases by support vector machines and artificial neural networks, in 2009 International Association of Computer Science and Information Technology-Spring Conference (IEEE, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. İÖ Bucak, S. Baki, Diagnosis of liver disease by using CMAC neural network approach, Expert. Syst. Appl. 37(9), 6157–6164 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  37. L.M. Ming, L. Chu Kiong, L.W. Soong, Autonomous and deterministic supervised fuzzy clustering with data imputation capabilities. Appl. Soft Comput. 11(1), 1117–1125 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. B.V. Ramana, M.S. Prasad Babu, N.B. Venkateswarlu, Liver classification using modified rotation forest.Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev. 6(1), 17–24 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  39. S.N.N. Alfisahrin, T. Mantoro, Data mining techniques for optimization of liver disease classification, in 2013 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science Applications and Technologies (IEEE, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  40. O.S. Soliman, E.A. Elhamd, Classification of hepatitis C virus using modified particle swarm optimization and least squares support vector machine.Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 5(3), 122 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  41. H. Ayeldeen, et al., Prediction of liver fibrosis stages by machine learning model: A decision tree approach, in 2015 Third World Conference on Complex Systems (WCCS) (IEEE, 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  42. M. Birjandi, et al., Prediction and diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and identification of its associated factors using the classification tree method. Iran. Red Crescent Med. J. 18(11) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  43. M. Hassoon, et al., Rule optimization of boosted c5. 0 classification using genetic algorithm for liver disease prediction, in 2017 International Conference on Computer and Applications (ICCA) (IEEE, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  44. M.M. Islam, et al., Applications of machine learning in fatty live disease prediction. MIE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  45. M. Sato, et al., Machine-learning approach for the development of a novel predictive model for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1–7 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hashem, Somaya, et al. “Machine Learning Prediction Models for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma with HCV-related Chronic Liver Disease.” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (2020): 105551.

    Google Scholar 

  47. R. Philip, M. Mathias, K.M. Damodara Gowda, Evalation of relationship between markers of liver function and the onset of type 2 diabetes. J. Health Allied Sci. 4(2), 090-093 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Q.M. Nguyen, et al., Elevated liver function enzymes are related to the development of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in younger adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Diabetes Care 34(12), 2603–2607 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  49. H. Ni, H.H.K. Soe, A. Htet, Determinants of abnormal liver function tests in diabetes patients in Myanmar. Int J Diabetes Res 1(3), 36–41 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. D.H. Salih, Study of liver function tests and renal function Tests in diabetic type II patients. IOSR J. Appl. Chem 3(3), 42–44 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. K. Bora, et al., Presence of concurrent derangements of liver function tests in type 2 diabetes and their relationship with glycemic status: a retrospective observational study from Meghalaya. J. Lab. Physicians 8(1), 30 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  52. S. Ghimire, et al., Abnormal liver parameters among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus Nepalese population. Biochem Pharmacol (Los Angel) 7(1), 2167-0501 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  53. A. Singh, et al., Deranged liver function tests in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective study

    Google Scholar 

  54. G. Teshome, et al., Prevalence of liver function test abnormality and associated factors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a comparative cross-sectional study. EJIFCC 30(3), 303 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  55. D. Nikitha Alampally, DS Jaipuriar, N. Alampally, A study on liver function impairment in type-2 diabetes mellitus.IJRAR-Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev. (IJRAR) 7(1), 939–943 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Altaf, I., Butt, M.A., Zaman, M. (2022). Disease Detection and Prediction Using the Liver Function Test Data: A Review of Machine Learning Algorithms. In: Khanna, A., Gupta, D., Bhattacharyya, S., Hassanien, A.E., Anand, S., Jaiswal, A. (eds) International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1388. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2597-8_68

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics