Skip to main content

A Hybrid Fusion-Based Algorithm for Underwater Image Enhancement Using Fog Aware Density Evaluator and Mean Saturation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications

Abstract

Underwater images are degraded mainly due to scattering and absorption effects but are key in oceanographic studies and research. Therefore, we need to develop methods that generate visually pleasing images and retain the original information. In this paper, we propose a method that chooses between Multiscale Fusion, Edge Preserving Decomposition-Based Haze Removal Algorithm or a combination of both. The algorithm that is to be used in an image is based on mean saturation value and fog density using Fog Aware Density Evaluator (FADE). The resulting image retains the natural color distribution, is dehazed and enhanced. The proposed algorithm doesn’t require prior hardware usage or prerequisite knowledge of the underwater environment. The proposed algorithm performs considerably well when compared to previous approaches against various image quality metrics such as UIQM, PCQI, PIQE, BRISQUE and Average Gradient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. H. Koschmieder, Theorie der horizontalen sichtweite. Beitrage Phys. Freien Atmos. 12, 171–181 (1924)

    Google Scholar 

  2. C.O. Ancuti, C. Ancuti, C. De Vleeschouwer, P. Bekaert, Color balance and fusion for underwater image enhancement. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 27(1), 379–393 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2017.2759252. Jan

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Galdran, D. Pardo, A. Picon, A. Alvarez-Gila, Automatic red-channel underwater image restoration. J. Vis. Commun. Image Representation. 26 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2014.11.006

  4. Z. Li, J. Zheng, Edge-preserving decomposition-based single image haze removal. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24(12), 5432–5441 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2015.2482903. Dec

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Ebner, The Gray World Assumption (Wiley, Color Constancy. Chichester, West Sussex, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. L.K. Choi, J. You, A.C. Bovik, Referenceless prediction of perceptual fog density and perceptual image defogging. IEEE Trans Image Process. 24(11), 3888–3901 (2015). Nov

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Panetta, C. Gao, S. Agaian, Human-visual-system-inspired underwater image quality,measures. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 41(3), 541–551 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2015.2469915. July

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Wang, K. Ma, H. Yeganeh, Z. Wang, W. Lin, A patch-structure representation method for quality assessment of contrast changed images. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 22(12), 2387–2390 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2015.2487369. Dec.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Venkatanath, D. Praneeth, BhM Chandrasekhar, S.S. Channappayya, S.S. Medasani, Blind image quality evaluation using perception based features, in Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Communications (NCC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Mittal, A.K. Moorthy, A.C. Bovik, No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21(12), 4695–4708 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Xiao, J. Hays, K. Ehinger, A. Oliva, A. Torralba, SUN database: large-scale scene recognition from abbey to zoo, in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reefbase.org. http://www.reefbase.org/resource$_$center/photos.aspx?stress=BL

  13. T. Huang . Underwater Images. MATLAB Central File Exchange (2020). https://www.mathworks.com/matlab-central/fileexchange/51082-underwater-images

  14. L.K. Choi, J. You, A.C. Bovik, LIVE image defogging database (2015). http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/fog/fade$_$defade.html

  15. Coral Reef Puerto Rico. https://web.whoi.edu/singh/underwater-imaging/datasets/coral-reef-puerto-rico/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Paulson, R.M., Gopalakrishnan, S., Mahendiran, S., Srambical, V.P., Gopan, N.R. (2022). A Hybrid Fusion-Based Algorithm for Underwater Image Enhancement Using Fog Aware Density Evaluator and Mean Saturation. In: Khanna, A., Gupta, D., Bhattacharyya, S., Hassanien, A.E., Anand, S., Jaiswal, A. (eds) International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1388. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2597-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics