Abstract
This paper focuses on studying the potential of the hydrokinetic energy harnessing along the longest river in Peninsular Malaysia, which is the Pahang River. The data such water discharge and water depth on ten selected sites at the Telemetry Gauging Station (GS) owned by Department of Drainage and Irrigation, Malaysia (DID) have been used for the assessment of hydrokinetic potentials. The Flow Duration Curve (FDC) at the potential site has been plotted to analyse the Q50. This assessment study indicated that the two rivers along the Pahang River basin have a significant potential for hydrokinetic energy harnessing. Subsequently, four different types of turbines with different size and power coefficient (Cp) has been used to calculate the output power and total annual energy yield. The estimated annual energy yield for Sg. Pahang at Lubuk Paku is ranging from 69.5 to 173.7 MWh. Whereas Sg. Pahang at Temerloh is between 45.54 and 113.8 MWh per year.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Behrouzi F, Nakisa M, Maimun A, Ahmed YM (2016) Global renewable energy and its potential in Malaysia: a review of Hydrokinetic turbine technology. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 62:1270–1281
Vermaak HJ, Kusakana K, Koko SP (2014) Status of micro-hydrokinetic river technology in rural applications: a review of literature. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:625–633
Yuce MI, Muratoglu A (2015) Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems: a technology status review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:72–82
Mehrpooya M, Khalili M, Sharifzadeh MMM (2018) Model development and energy and exergy analysis of the biomass gasification process (Based on the various biomass sources). Renew Sustain Energy Rev 91:869–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.076
Hou J, Cao M, Liu P (2018) Development and utilization of geothermal energy in China: current practices and future strategies. Renew Energy 1(25):401–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.115
Yah NF, Oumer AN, Idris MS (2017) Small scale hydro-power as a source of renewable energy in Malaysia: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:228–239
Comello S, Reichelstein S, Sahoo A (2018) The road ahead for solar PV power. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 92:744–756
Ho L-W (2016) Wind energy in Malaysia: past, present and future. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 53:279–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.054
Energy B (2018) BP Energy outlook: 2018 Edition. BP Energy Econ 2018:125. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/pdf/energy-economics/energy-outlook/bp-energy-outlook-2018.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2019
Exxon Mobil (2018) 2018 outlook for energy: a view to 2040
Kadier A, Sahaid M, Pudukudy M, Abu H, Mohamed A, Abdul A (2018) Pico hydropower (PHP) development in Malaysia: potential, present status, barriers and future perspectives. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:2796–2805
Borhanazad H, Mekhilef S, Saidur R, Boroumandjazi G (2013) Potential application of renewable energy for rural electrification in Malaysia. Renew Energy 59:210–219
Sustainable Energy Development Authority (SEDA) Malaysia (2018) Sustainable energy Malaysia 2(4):1–2
Izadyar N, Ong HC, Chong WT, Mojumder JC, Leong KY (2016) Investigation of potential hybrid renewable energy at various rural areas in Malaysia. J Clean Prod 139:61–73
Sovacool BK, Bulan LC (2012) Energy security and hydropower development in Malaysia: the drivers and challenges facing the Sarawak corridor of renewable energy (SCORE). Renew Energy 40:113–129
Ibrahim WI, Ismail RMTR, Mohamed MR (2018) Hydrokinetic energy harnessing for river application. J Telecommun Electron Comput Eng 10:133–138
Khan MJ, Iqbal MT, Quaicoe JE (2008) River current energy conversion systems: progress, prospects and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12:2177–2193
Kirke B (2019) Hydrokinetic and ultra-low head turbines in rivers: a reality check. Energy Sustain Dev 52:1–10
Forbush D, Cavagnaro RJ, Donegan J, McEntee J, Polagye B (2017) Multi-mode evaluation of power-maximizing cross-flow turbine controllers. Int J Mar Energy 20:80–96
Anyi M, Kirke B (2010) Evaluation of small axial flow hydrokinetic turbines for remote communities. Energy Sustain Dev 14:110–116
Alvarez Alvarez E, Rico-Secades M, Corominas EL, Huerta-Medina N, Soler GJ (2018) Design and control strategies for a modular hydroKinetic smart grid. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 95:137–145
Sarauskiene D (2017) Assessment of hydrokinetic resources of small and medium-size rivers: the Lithuanian Case. Baltica 30:23–30
Jenkinson W, Klyszejko E, Nadeau M (2014) Assessment of Canada’s river hydrokinetic power potential. In: International conference on ocean energy, Halifax, NS Canada, pp 1–17
Marine Renewables Canada (2018) State of the sector report. Canada
Kalnacs A (2017) Energy potential assessment and efficiency improvement of in-stream hydrokinetic devices. Riga Technical University
Canadian Hydraulics Centre (National Research Council of Canada) (2010) Assessment of Canada’s hydrokinetic power potential (phase I report, methodology and data review), pp 1–72
Tekolla AW (2010) Rainfall and flood frequency analysis in Pahang River Basin, Malaysia. Master Sci Thesis Water Resour Eng 1–80
Gasim MB, Toriman ME, Idris M, Lun PI, Kamarudin MKA, Nor Azlina AA et al (2013) River flow conditions and dynamic state analysis of Pahang river. Am J Appl Sci 10:42–57
Phil Turnipseed D, Sauer VB (2010) Discharge measurements at gaging stations. Virginia
Oregan State Unversity (2018) Analysis techniques: flow duration analysis. Streamflow Eval Watershed Restor Plan Des 2018 1–2. https://streamflow.engr.oregonstate.edu/analysis/flow/index.htm. Accessed 27 July 2018
Kaunda CS, Kimambo CZ, Nielsen TK (2014) A technical discussion on microhydropower technology and its turbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 35:445–459
Requena AI, Chebana F, Ouarda TBMJ (2018) Advances in water resources a functional framework for flow-duration-curve and daily streamflow estimation at ungauged sites. Adv Water Resour 113:328–340
Pumo D, Viola F, La LG, Noto LV (2014) Annual flow duration curves assessment in ephemeral small basins. J Hydrol 519:258–270
Atieh M, Taylor G, Sattar AMA, Gharabaghi B (2017) Prediction of flow duration curves for ungauged basins. J Hydrol 545:383–394
Ani SO, Polinder H, Ferreira JA (2013) Comparison of energy yield of small wind turbines in low wind speed areas. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 4:42–49
Gasim MB, Sultan U, Abidin Z, Rahim SA (2011) Hydrological pattern of Pahang River basin and their relation to flood historical event. J e-Bangi 6:1–10
Johnson JB, Pride DJ (2010) River, tidal and ocean current hydrokinetic energy technologies: status and future opportunities in Alaska. Alaska Cent Energy Power
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank to Universiti Malaysia Pahang for funding support under UMP Postgraduate Research Scheme (PGRS190318) and Department of Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia, Jalan Ampang Kuala Lumpur for the Pahang River data between 2012 and 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ibrahim, W.I., Mohamed, M.R., Ismail, R.M.T.R. (2022). The Potential of Hydrokinetic Energy Harnessing in Pahang River Basin. In: Isa, K., et al. Proceedings of the 12th National Technical Seminar on Unmanned System Technology 2020. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 770. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2406-3_85
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2406-3_85
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2405-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2406-3
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)