Skip to main content

The Potential of Hydrokinetic Energy Harnessing in Pahang River Basin

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 12th National Technical Seminar on Unmanned System Technology 2020

Abstract

This paper focuses on studying the potential of the hydrokinetic energy harnessing along the longest river in Peninsular Malaysia, which is the Pahang River. The data such water discharge and water depth on ten selected sites at the Telemetry Gauging Station (GS) owned by Department of Drainage and Irrigation, Malaysia (DID) have been used for the assessment of hydrokinetic potentials. The Flow Duration Curve (FDC) at the potential site has been plotted to analyse the Q50. This assessment study indicated that the two rivers along the Pahang River basin have a significant potential for hydrokinetic energy harnessing. Subsequently, four different types of turbines with different size and power coefficient (Cp) has been used to calculate the output power and total annual energy yield. The estimated annual energy yield for Sg. Pahang at Lubuk Paku is ranging from 69.5 to 173.7 MWh. Whereas Sg. Pahang at Temerloh is between 45.54 and 113.8 MWh per year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Behrouzi F, Nakisa M, Maimun A, Ahmed YM (2016) Global renewable energy and its potential in Malaysia: a review of Hydrokinetic turbine technology. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 62:1270–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vermaak HJ, Kusakana K, Koko SP (2014) Status of micro-hydrokinetic river technology in rural applications: a review of literature. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:625–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yuce MI, Muratoglu A (2015) Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems: a technology status review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:72–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mehrpooya M, Khalili M, Sharifzadeh MMM (2018) Model development and energy and exergy analysis of the biomass gasification process (Based on the various biomass sources). Renew Sustain Energy Rev 91:869–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.076

  5. Hou J, Cao M, Liu P (2018) Development and utilization of geothermal energy in China: current practices and future strategies. Renew Energy 1(25):401–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yah NF, Oumer AN, Idris MS (2017) Small scale hydro-power as a source of renewable energy in Malaysia: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:228–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Comello S, Reichelstein S, Sahoo A (2018) The road ahead for solar PV power. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 92:744–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho L-W (2016) Wind energy in Malaysia: past, present and future. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 53:279–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Energy B (2018) BP Energy outlook: 2018 Edition. BP Energy Econ 2018:125. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/pdf/energy-economics/energy-outlook/bp-energy-outlook-2018.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2019

  10. Exxon Mobil (2018) 2018 outlook for energy: a view to 2040

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kadier A, Sahaid M, Pudukudy M, Abu H, Mohamed A, Abdul A (2018) Pico hydropower (PHP) development in Malaysia: potential, present status, barriers and future perspectives. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:2796–2805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Borhanazad H, Mekhilef S, Saidur R, Boroumandjazi G (2013) Potential application of renewable energy for rural electrification in Malaysia. Renew Energy 59:210–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sustainable Energy Development Authority (SEDA) Malaysia (2018) Sustainable energy Malaysia 2(4):1–2

    Google Scholar 

  14. Izadyar N, Ong HC, Chong WT, Mojumder JC, Leong KY (2016) Investigation of potential hybrid renewable energy at various rural areas in Malaysia. J Clean Prod 139:61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sovacool BK, Bulan LC (2012) Energy security and hydropower development in Malaysia: the drivers and challenges facing the Sarawak corridor of renewable energy (SCORE). Renew Energy 40:113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ibrahim WI, Ismail RMTR, Mohamed MR (2018) Hydrokinetic energy harnessing for river application. J Telecommun Electron Comput Eng 10:133–138

    Google Scholar 

  17. Khan MJ, Iqbal MT, Quaicoe JE (2008) River current energy conversion systems: progress, prospects and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12:2177–2193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirke B (2019) Hydrokinetic and ultra-low head turbines in rivers: a reality check. Energy Sustain Dev 52:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Forbush D, Cavagnaro RJ, Donegan J, McEntee J, Polagye B (2017) Multi-mode evaluation of power-maximizing cross-flow turbine controllers. Int J Mar Energy 20:80–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Anyi M, Kirke B (2010) Evaluation of small axial flow hydrokinetic turbines for remote communities. Energy Sustain Dev 14:110–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alvarez Alvarez E, Rico-Secades M, Corominas EL, Huerta-Medina N, Soler GJ (2018) Design and control strategies for a modular hydroKinetic smart grid. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 95:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sarauskiene D (2017) Assessment of hydrokinetic resources of small and medium-size rivers: the Lithuanian Case. Baltica 30:23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jenkinson W, Klyszejko E, Nadeau M (2014) Assessment of Canada’s river hydrokinetic power potential. In: International conference on ocean energy, Halifax, NS Canada, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marine Renewables Canada (2018) State of the sector report. Canada

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kalnacs A (2017) Energy potential assessment and efficiency improvement of in-stream hydrokinetic devices. Riga Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  26. Canadian Hydraulics Centre (National Research Council of Canada) (2010) Assessment of Canada’s hydrokinetic power potential (phase I report, methodology and data review), pp 1–72

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tekolla AW (2010) Rainfall and flood frequency analysis in Pahang River Basin, Malaysia. Master Sci Thesis Water Resour Eng 1–80

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gasim MB, Toriman ME, Idris M, Lun PI, Kamarudin MKA, Nor Azlina AA et al (2013) River flow conditions and dynamic state analysis of Pahang river. Am J Appl Sci 10:42–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Phil Turnipseed D, Sauer VB (2010) Discharge measurements at gaging stations. Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  30. Oregan State Unversity (2018) Analysis techniques: flow duration analysis. Streamflow Eval Watershed Restor Plan Des 2018 1–2. https://streamflow.engr.oregonstate.edu/analysis/flow/index.htm. Accessed 27 July 2018

  31. Kaunda CS, Kimambo CZ, Nielsen TK (2014) A technical discussion on microhydropower technology and its turbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 35:445–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Requena AI, Chebana F, Ouarda TBMJ (2018) Advances in water resources a functional framework for flow-duration-curve and daily streamflow estimation at ungauged sites. Adv Water Resour 113:328–340

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pumo D, Viola F, La LG, Noto LV (2014) Annual flow duration curves assessment in ephemeral small basins. J Hydrol 519:258–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Atieh M, Taylor G, Sattar AMA, Gharabaghi B (2017) Prediction of flow duration curves for ungauged basins. J Hydrol 545:383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ani SO, Polinder H, Ferreira JA (2013) Comparison of energy yield of small wind turbines in low wind speed areas. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 4:42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gasim MB, Sultan U, Abidin Z, Rahim SA (2011) Hydrological pattern of Pahang River basin and their relation to flood historical event. J e-Bangi 6:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  37. Johnson JB, Pride DJ (2010) River, tidal and ocean current hydrokinetic energy technologies: status and future opportunities in Alaska. Alaska Cent Energy Power

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank to Universiti Malaysia Pahang for funding support under UMP Postgraduate Research Scheme (PGRS190318) and Department of Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia, Jalan Ampang Kuala Lumpur for the Pahang River data between 2012 and 2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. I. Ibrahim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ibrahim, W.I., Mohamed, M.R., Ismail, R.M.T.R. (2022). The Potential of Hydrokinetic Energy Harnessing in Pahang River Basin. In: Isa, K., et al. Proceedings of the 12th National Technical Seminar on Unmanned System Technology 2020. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 770. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2406-3_85

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics