Abstract
The right to have a say in decisions that affect one’s life is a core human right and a key emphasis of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Securing this right serves to empower disabled people and establish their position as “experts” in matters that affect their lives. This chapter examines how the CRPD and the human rights approach to disability that it embodies have served as a catalyst for the adoption of a new approach by disabled people’s organizations (DPOs) to putting pressure on the authorities to engage in a more robust way with DPOs in the development of laws and policies, as called for by the Convention. It draws on the example of the process leading up to the adoption of new core disability service legislation in Iceland, which saw the emergence of the DPOs’ use of the CRPD, as well as the General Comments by the CRPD Committee, as a tool to effectively advance the rights of persons with disabilities. This new strategy resulted in key changes to the legislation at the last stages of consultation.
References
Agger, B. (1989). Critical social theories: An introduction. Westview.
Althingi. (2018). Lög um þjónustu við fatlað fólk með langvarandi stuðningsþarfir. (Laws Pertaining to Services for Disabled People with Long-Term Support Needs), No. 38/2018. Althingi.
Althingi, Welfare Committee. (2017). Comments by representative organizations of disabled people on draft legislation pertaining to the rights of disabled people with significant support needs. Available online: http://www.althingi.is/pdf/erindi mals/?lthing=146&malnr=438. Accessed on 5 Oct 2017.
Arnardóttir, O. M. (2009). A future of multidimensional disadvantage equality? In O. M. Arnardóttir & G. Quinn (Eds.), The United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: European and Scandinavian perspectives. Martinus Nijhoff.
Arstein-Kerslake, A. (2017). Legal capacity and supported decision-making: Respecting rights and empowering people. In C. O’Mahony & G. Quinn (Eds.), Disability law and policy: An analysis of the UN convention. Clarus Press.
Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. University of California Press.
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2018a). General Comment No. 6 on equality and non-discrimination (CRPD/C/GC/6). United Nations.
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2018b). General Comment No. 7 on the participation of persons with disabilities, including children with disabilities, through their representative organizations, in the implementation and monitoring of the convention (CRPD/C/GC/7). United Nations.
Degener, T. (2016). Disability in a human rights context. Laws, 5, 35.
Encalada, A. V. (2020). Transforming disability law and policy in Peru. In K. Soldatic & K. Johnson (Eds.), Global perspectives on disability activism and advocacy (pp. 232–244). Routledge.
Kanter, A. S. (2007). The promise and challenge of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 34, 287–321.
Kanter, A. S. (2015). The development of disability rights under international law: From charity to human rights. Routledge.
Kellner, D. (1993). Critical theory today: Revisiting the classics. Theory, Culture & Society, 10(2), 43–60.
Keys, M. (2017). Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the European Convention on Human Rights. In C. O’Mahony & G. Quinn (Eds.), Disability law and policy: An analysis of the UN convention. Claruss Press.
Löve, L., Traustadóttir, R., Quinn, G., & Rice, J. (2017). The inclusion of the lived experience of disability in policymaking. Laws, 6, 33.
Löve, L., Traustadóttir, R., & Rice, J. (2018). Achieving disability equality: Empowering disabled people to take the lead. Social Inclusion, 6, 1–8.
Löve, L., Traustadóttir, R., & Rice, J. (2019). Shifting the balance of power: The strategic use of the CRPD by Disabled People‘s Organizations in securing ‘a seat at the table’. Laws, 8, 11.
Meekosha, H., & Shuttleworth, R. (2009). What’s so ‘critical’ about critical disability studies? Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15, 47–75.
Minow, M. (1990). Making all the difference: Inclusion, exclusion and American law. Cornell University Press.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2010). Monitoring the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Guidance for human rights monitors (Professional Training Series No. 17). Office of the High Commission for Human Rights.
Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement: Critical texts in social work and the welfare state. Macmillan.
Priestley, M., Stickings, M., Loja, E., Grammeons, S., Lawson, A., Waddington, L., & Fridriksdóttir, B. (2016). The political participation of disabled people in Europe: Rights, accessibility and activism. Electoral Studies, 42, 1–9.
Quinn, G., & O’Mahony, C. (2017). Introduction. In C. O’Mahony & G. Quinn (Eds.), Disability law and policy: An analysis of the UN Convention (pp. xxiii–xxv). Clarus.
Sherlaw, W., & Hudebine, H. (2015). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Opportunities and tensions within the social inclusion and participation of persons with disabilities. ALTER, European Journal of Disability Research, 9, 9–21.
Skarstad, K., & Stein, M. A. (2018). Mainstreaming disability in the United Nations treaty bodies. Journal of Human Rights, 17, 1–24.
Soldatic, K., & Johnson, K. (Eds.). (2020). Global perspectives on disability activism and advocacy: Our way. Routledge.
Stein, M. A., & Lord, J. E. (2010). Monitoring the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Innovations, lost opportunities, and future potential. Human Rights Quarterly, 32, 689–728.
Stein, M. A., & Stein, P. J. S. (2007). Beyond disability civil rights. Hastings Law Journal, 58, 1203–1240.
Traustadóttir, R. (2009). Disability studies, the social model and legal developments. In O. M. Arnardóttir & G. Quinn (Eds.), The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: European and Scandinavian perspectives (pp. 3–16). Martinus Nijhoff.
Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Löve, L.E., Traustadóttir, R. (2022). Disabled People’s Mobilization Around a Human Rights Approach to Enhance Their Participation in Law and Policy Making in Iceland. In: Rioux, M.H., Viera, J., Buettgen, A., Zubrow, E. (eds) Handbook of Disability. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1278-7_7-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1278-7_7-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1278-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1278-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences