Skip to main content

A Comparative Analysis on Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition Using Various Deep Learning Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Computer Networks, Big Data and IoT

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies ((LNDECT,volume 66))

Abstract

To forecast conditions of action or actions during physical activity, the issue of classifying body gestures and reactions is referred to as human activity recognition (HAR). As the main technique to determine the range of motion, speed, velocity, and magnetic field orientation during these physical exercises, inertial measurement units (IMUs) prevail. Inertial sensors on the body can be used to produce signals tracking body motion and vital signs that can develop models efficiently and identify physical activity correctly. Extreme gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron, convolutional neural network, and long short-term memory network methods are contrasted in this paper to distinguish human behaviors on the HEALTH datasets. The efficiency of machine learning models is often compared to studies that better fit the multisensory fusion analysis paradigm. The experimental findings of this article on the MHEALTH dataset are strongly promising and reliably outperform current baseline models, comprising of 12 physical activities obtained from four separate inertial sensors. The best efficiency metrics were obtained by MLP and XGBoost with accuracy (92.85%, 90.97%), precision (94.66%, 92.09%), recall (91.59%, 89.99%), and F1-score (92.7%, 90.78%), respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Heart.org (2019) [Online]. Available: https://www.heart.org/-/media/files/about-us/policy-research/policy-positions/clinical-care/remote-patient-monitoring-guidance-2019.pdf

  2. Khusainov R, Azzi D, Achumba IE, Bersch SD (2013) Real-time human ambulation, activity, and physiological monitoring: taxonomy of issues, techniques, applications, challenges and limitations. Sensors

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roobini S, Fenila Naomi J (2019) Smartphone sensor based human activity recognition using deep learning models. Int J Recent Technol Eng (IJRTE) 8(1)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang J, Chen Y, Hao S, Peng X, Hu L (2019) Deep learning for sensor-based activity recognition: a survey. Pattern Recog Lett 119:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Slim SO, Atia A, Elfatta MM, Mostafa MSM (2019) A survey on human activity recognition based on acceleration data. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 10:84–98

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sousa W, Souto E, Rodrigres J, Sadarc P, Jalali R, El-Khatib K (2017) A comparative analysis of the impact of features on human activity recognition with smartphone sensors. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Brazillian symposium on multimedia and the Web, Gramado, Brazil, 17–20 Oct 2017; pp 397–404

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foerster F, Smeja M, Fahrenberg J (1999) Detection of posture and motion by accelerometry: a validation study in ambulatory monitoring. Comput Hum Behav 15(5):571–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bashar A (2019) Survey on evolving deep learning neural network architectures. J Artif Intell 1(2):73–82

    Google Scholar 

  9. Prabakeran S (2018) In-depth survey to perceiving the effect of kidney dialysis parameters using clustering framework. J Comput Theor Nanosci 15(6–7):2233–2237

    Google Scholar 

  10. Indumathi V (2018) Utilizing data mining classification technique to predict kidney diseases. J Comput Theor Nanosci 15(6–7):2193–2196

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang W, Yin Z (2015) Human activity recognition using wearable sensors by deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference, pp 1307–1310

    Google Scholar 

  12. Banos O, Garcia R, Saez A (2019) UCI machine learning repository: MHEALTH Dataset Data Set, Archive.ics.uci.edu

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang M, Sawchuk AA (2012) Human activities dataset. Sipi.usc.edu

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shoaib M, Bosch S, Durmaz Incel O, Scholten H (2014) Fusion of smartphone motion sensors for physical activity recognition. Sensors

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hammerla NY, Halloran S, Plotz T (2016) Deep, convolutional, and recurrent models for human activity recognition using wearables. IJCAI

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim Y, Moon T (2015) Human detection and activity classification based on micro-doppler signatures using deep convolutional neural networks

    Google Scholar 

  17. Javier Ordóñez F (2016) Deep convolutional and LSTM recurrent neural networks for multimodal wearable activity recognition. Sensors 16:115 [69]

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang W, Zhao X, Li Z (2019) A comprehensive study of smartphone-based indoor activity recognition via Xgboost. IEEE Access 7:80027–80042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen T, Fernandez D, Nguyen Q, Bagheri E (2017) Location-aware human activity recognition. Adv Data Min Appl 821–835

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mo L, Li F, Zhu Y, Huang A (2016) Human physical activity recognition based on computer vision with deep learning model. In: 2016 IEEE international instrumentation and measurement technology conference proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cornell Activity Datasets: CAD-60 & CAD-120 | re3data.org, Re3data.org, 2019

    Google Scholar 

  22. Catal C, Tufekci S, Pirmit E, Kocabag G (2015) On the use of ensemble of classifiers for accelerometer-based activity recognition. Appl Soft Comput

    Google Scholar 

  23. Talukdar J, Mehta B (2019) Human action recognition system using good features and multilayer perceptron network

    Google Scholar 

  24. Luo W, Li Y, Urtasun R, Zemel R (2019) Understanding the effective receptive field in deep convolutional neural networks

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw 61:85–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mody M, Mathew M, Jagannathan S, Redfern A, Jones J, Lorenzen T (2019) CNN inference: VLSI architecture for convolution layer for 1.2 TOPS. Ieeexplore.ieee.org

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Indumathi, V., Prabakeran, S. (2021). A Comparative Analysis on Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition Using Various Deep Learning Techniques. In: Pandian, A., Fernando, X., Islam, S.M.S. (eds) Computer Networks, Big Data and IoT. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 66. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0965-7_70

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0965-7_70

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0964-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0965-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics