Skip to main content

Innovating the Design of Lower-Level Reading and Writing Curriculum for the Digital Age

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies

Abstract

This chapter proposes an innovative curricular design that centers around the concept of digital performance to address three major shortcomings of lower-level reading and writing tasks as implemented by existing Chinese curriculums in the United States and beyond. First, the core emphasis on literacy development focuses students’ attention on rote memorization of characters rather than the development of text-based communicative skills. Second, decontextualizing reading and writing events from their social contexts leads to a deep misunderstanding where handwriting grammatical sentences is equated with meaningful writing. Third, there is an underutilization of technology-assisted reading and typing tasks as learning activities. To fill the gap between our vision of what a successful Chinese language learner needs to accomplish in the target culture and the existing instructional methodologies, we propose a new pedagogical concept of “digital performance” and design an innovative lower-level reading and writing curriculum around this concept. By “digital performance,” we mean using text in combination with other digital semiotic resources for computer-mediated forms of communication. The proposed curriculum consists of three features. First, it encourages students to read extensively with a goal of developing reading skills at a faster pace than handwriting skills. Second, it devotes valuable class time to conduct reading-based speaking activities and reading-based writing activities instead of focusing on memorization of Chinese characters. Third, it actively adopts contextualized performances in a digital environment such as texting, responding to emails, and posting on social media as class activities. The proposed approach has been applied in the first-year curriculum at a private college in North America. The assessment results show that most students were able to read and comprehend Chinese characters that they were not required to handwrite. Students also demonstrated strong ability and willingness to participate in a series of authentic text-based reading and typing tasks at the end of the academic year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, Joseph R. 2008. Why learning to write Chinese is a waste of time: A modest proposal. Foreign Language Annals 41: 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Dayle. 1970. Writing in Chinese. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 4 (1): 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Cecilia. 2010. See how they read: An investigation into the cognitive and metacognitive strategies of nonnative readers of Chinese. In Research among learners of Chinese as a foreign language, Chinese Language Teachers Association monograph series, vol. 4, ed. M. E. Everson & H. H. Shen, 93–116. National Foreign Language Resource Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ching, Nora, and Eugene Ching. 1975. Teaching the writing of Chinese characters. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 10 (1): 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Matthew B., and Mari Noda. 2002. A performance-based pedagogy for communicating in cultures: Training teachers for East Asian languages. Columbus: National East Asian Languages Resource Center at The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Matthew B., and J. Paul Warnick. 2006. Performed culture: An approach to East Asian language pedagogy. Columbus: National East Asian Languages Resource Center at The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, Dorothy, Bryan Smith, and Richard Kern. 2016. Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. The Modern Language Journal 100: 64–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Zoltán. 2009. The L2 motivational self system. In Motivation, language identity and the L2 self, ed. Zoltán Dörnyei and Ema Ushioda, 9–42. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Everson, Michael E. 1993. Research in the less commonly taught languages. In Research in language learning, ed. A. Omaggio Hadley, 198–228. Lincolnwood: National Textbook Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Word recognition among learners of Chinese as a foreign language: Investigating the relationship between naming and knowing. Modern Language Journal 82: 194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everson, Michael E., and Chuanren Ke. 1997. An inquiry into the reading strategies of intermediate and advanced learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 32 (1): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Kenneth S. 1973. Comprehension-centered reading. In Reading in education: A broad view, ed. Malcolm P. Douglass, 251–260. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedgcock, John, and Natalie Lefkowitz. 2011. Exploring the learning potential of writing development in heritage language education. In Learning to write and writing to learn in an additional language, ed. Rosa M. Manchón, 209–233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Wei. 1998. An empirical study of Chinese business writing. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 33 (3): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Sha. 2018a. Authentic texts as reading materials in a Chinese as a foreign language classroom: Learners’ perceptions and pedagogical implications. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages 23: 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018b. Effective strategy groups used by readers of Chinese as a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language 30 (1): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, Thomas W., and Ming Jian. 2003. Language learning and the on-line environment: The views of learners of Chinese. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 38 (1): 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Henry. 2009. Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, Junqing. 2019. Chinese language learner motivation: Vision, socialization and progression. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal 10 (1): 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Lianjiang, and Jasmine Luk. 2016. Multimodal composing as a learning activity in English classrooms: Inquiring into the sources of its motivational capacity. System 59: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Honggang. 2007. Syntactic maturity in second language writings: A case of Chinese as a foreign language (CFL). Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 42 (1): 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke, Chuanren. 1998. Effects of language background on the learning of Chinese characters among foreign language students. Foreign Language Annals 31: 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Research in second language acquisition of Chinese: Where we are, where we are going. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 47 (3): 43–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koda, Keiko. 1993. Task-induced variability in FL composition: Language-specific perspectives. Foreign Language Annals 26 (3): 332–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubanyiova, Magdalena, and Graham Crookes. 2016. Re-envisioning the roles, tasks, and contributions of language teachers in the multilingual era of language education research and practice. Modern Language Journal 100 (1): 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubler, Cornelius. 1997. NFLC guide for basic Chinese language programs: Pathways to advanced skills. Vol. III. Columbus: Foreign Language Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Basic mandarin Chinese: Speaking and listening, revised edition. Clarendon: Tuttle Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammers, Jayne C., Alecia M. Magnifico, and Jen S. Curwood. 2014. Exploring tools, places, and ways of being: Audience matters for developing writers. In Exploring technology for writing and writing instruction, ed. Kristine E. Pytash and Richard E. Ferdig, 186–201. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Siu-Lun. 2011. Online components for advanced Chinese reading classes: Design and implementation. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching 2 (1): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Thompson, Li-Chun. 2008. An investigation of reading strategies applied by American learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals 41 (4): 702–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Shouji. 2014. The gap in the use of lexical cohesive devices in writing between native Chinese speakers and second language users. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 49 (3): 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Yi. 2000. Vocabulary acquisition and learning Chinese as a foreign language. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 35 (1): 85–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Ying. 2014. Understanding readership: American students’ perceptions of evidence in Chinese persuasive composition. Ph.D. Dissertation. Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnifico, Alecia M. 2010. Writing for whom? Cognition, motivation, and a writer’s audience. Educational Psychologist 45: 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickel, Stanley L. 1980. Teaching the Chinese writing system. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 15 (1): 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, David. 1991. Why Chinese is so damn hard? Sino-Platonic papers 27: 59–70. http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp027_john_defrancis.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2019.

  • Mou, Sherry J. 2003. Integrating writing into elementary Chinese. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 38 (2): 109–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noda, Mari. 2003a. Learning to read as a native speaker. In Acts of Reading, ed. Hiroshi Nara and Mari Noda, 9–23. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003b. Reading as a social activity. In Acts of Reading, ed. Hiroshi Nara and Mari Noda, 24–37. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, June K. 1978. Reading is communication, too! Foreign Language Annals 11: 281–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, Michael. 2000. What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In Handbook of reading research, ed. Michael L. Kamil, Peter B. Mosenthal, P. David Pearson, and Rebecca Barr, vol. 3, 545–561. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In What research has to say about reading instruction, ed. Alan E. Farstrup and S. Jay Samuels, 3rd ed., 291–332. Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Helen H. 2000. The interconnections of reading text based writing and reading comprehension among college intermediate learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Journal of the Chinese Language Teacher’s Association 35 (3): 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Level of cognitive processing: Effects on character learning among non-native learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Language and Education 18: 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Linguistic complexity and beginning-level L2 Chinese reading. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 40 (3): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Helen H., and Chuanren Ke. 2007. Radical awareness and word acquisition among non-native learners of Chinese. Modern Language Journal 91 (1): 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Blaine E. 2014. Beyond words: A review of research on adolescents and multimodal composition. In Exploring multimodal composition and digital writing, ed. Richard E. Ferdig and Kristine E. Pytash, 1–19. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, Marcus, and Kevin Chung. 1999. Using radicals in teaching Chinese characters to second language learners. Psychologia 42: 243–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, Marcus, and Xiaoping Zhu. 1995. The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. In Morphological aspects of language processing, ed. Laurie B. Feldman, 293–316. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23: 761–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Amy S. 2017. Don’t tell me what to do! The anti-ought-to self and language learning motivation. System 67: 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, Ovid J. 1989. Neuropsychological studies of spoken and written Chinese: A decade’s effort. Keynote lecture in first northeast conference on Chinese linguistics, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Galal. 1984. “Literacy” and “reading” in a Chinese language program. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 19 (1): 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Intensive Chinese curriculum: The EASLI model. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 24 (2): 43–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Designing an intensive Chinese curriculum. In The pedagogy of performing another culture, ed. Galal Walker, 51–95. Wuhan: Hubei Jiaoyu Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Zulei. (王祖嫘) 2010. “书写”还是“输入”?——留学生汉字输入学习刍议 (“Writing” or “inputting” – discussion on overseas students’ learning of Chinese characters inputting). Journal of Modernization of Chinese Language Education 1(1): 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnick, Paul J. 1996. A phenomenology of reading performances: Reading Japanese as a foreign language. The Ohio State University Ph.D. ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Tianwei. (谢天蔚) 2011. “手写“还是”电写“——电脑输入中文引起的讨论 (“Hand-writing” vs. “electronic-writing”: Which way we should go in teaching Chinese?). Journal of Chinese Teaching and Research in the U.S.: 98–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Xiaoqiu, and Amado M. Padilla. 2013. Using meaningful interpretation and chunking to enhance memory: The case of Chinese character learning. Foreign Language Annals 46 (3): 402–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Chunsheng. 2013. Textual conjunctives and topic-fronting devices in CFL learners’ written summaries. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 48 (1): 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, De. 2009a. Essay writing in a mandarin Chinese WebCT discussion board. Foreign Language Annals 42 (4): 721–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Zhengsheng. 2009b. Myth, reality and character instruction in the 21st century. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 44 (1): 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Yongfang. 2013. A CIP spiral performance-based model for beginner level Chinese L2 reading instruction. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 48 (2): 91–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Shenglan. 2016. Killing two birds with one stone? Turning CFL learners into book writers: An exploratory study. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 51 (2): 164–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Zhengsheng. 2018. My never-ending education. In The field of Chinese language education in the U.S., ed. Vivian Ling, 281–289. London, UK/New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Qiwu (郑启五). 2010. 对外汉语教学“弃写”的思索 (Thinking about “giving up handwriting” in teaching Chinese as a foreign language). Retrieved February 15, 2020, from http://www.chinalanguage.org/showinfo.asp?id=645

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junqing Jia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Appendix: Interview Scripts

Appendix: Interview Scripts

Statement: As mentioned in the consent form, this interview will focus on your Chinese learning experiences and behaviors. You can pause the interview and skip a question that you do not feel comfortable answering at any time. Our interview will be voice-recorded for the purpose of data review. The recorded file will be saved in researcher’s work computer with restricted access. You could also pause or stop the recording during the interview by simply asking the researcher to do so. This interview will last about 15 min. Are you ready? Let’s start.

  1. 1.

    Do technology-assisted learning activities (such as sending contextualized emails, WeChat messages, and using APP to search restaurants) encourage you to practice Chinese more?

  2. 2.

    In your reading and writing classes, you were asked to use your computers and smartphones to accomplish real-life reading and typing tasks, such as replying emails or ordering Chinese food with friends. Please evaluate these tasks:

    • Are those tasks difficult compared with other classroom activities? (1, much easier than other activities; 3, the same difficult; 5, much more difficult than other activities)

    • Are those tasks helpful? (1, much less helpful than other activities; 3, the same helpful; 5, much more helpful than other activities) In which sense?

  3. 3.

    What do you like and dislike most about the above reading and typing activities?

  4. 4.

    How would you rate the amount of handwriting practice in your class? (1, insufficient emphasis on handwriting; 3, appropriate; 5, too much emphasis on handwriting)

  5. 5.

    How would you rate the amount of handwriting practice in your homework? (1, insufficient emphasis on handwriting; 3, appropriate; 5, too much emphasis on handwriting)

  6. 6.

    How would you rate the amount of handwriting in test? (1, emphasis on handwriting; 3, appropriate; 5, too much emphasis on handwriting)

  7. 7.

    What types of writing/tying activity would you like to spend more time on? (Practice handwriting? Writing emails? Posting on social media? Writing essays)

  8. 8.

    What types of writing/tying activity would you like to spend less time on? (Practice handwriting? Writing emails? Posting on social media? Writing essays)

  9. 9.

    Do you think being able to type Chinese contributes to your understanding of Chinese culture? If so, how?

  10. 10.

    Do you think being able to handwrite Chinese contributes to your understanding of Chinese culture? If so, how?

  11. 11.

    Besides doing your homework, have you had a chance to type Chinese on your computer or smartphone in your daily life? In which contexts?

  12. 12.

    Do you use any learning APP or websites to study Chinese? If yes, please provide details (which learning tools and in which contexts do you use them?).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Jia, J., Zeng, Z. (2022). Innovating the Design of Lower-Level Reading and Writing Curriculum for the Digital Age. In: Ye, Z. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0924-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics