Skip to main content

Part of the book series: New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives ((NFRSASIPER,volume 43))

  • 200 Accesses

Abstract

Many economically developed countries are confronting a declining birth rate and an aging population. Although many economists have attempted to explain these phenomena, they have not devoted sufficient attention to the existence of households without children. One important factor affecting the low fertility rate is high levels of childlessness. As described herein, we extend a simple growth model to consider the economic effects of rising childlessness rates on the utility of households and on the dynamic behaviors of an economy. Households are assumed to have different preferences for children. As a result of utility maximization, some households choose to have no children. Subsequently, we analyze the economic effect of an increase in the childlessness rate. We show that such a change tends to have adverse effects on household utility. Government policy, specifically a child allowance policy, is also considered. Results show that the marginal effects of such a policy might positively affect the utility of all households: households without children can benefit from such a policy. Furthermore, we provide a simple numerical example and infer the optimal level of a child allowance policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Subscript t represents the level in period t throughout this chapter.

  2. 2.

    Subscript i denotes the type of households throughout this chapter.

  3. 3.

    We specifically examine the economies of economically developed countries. Family support policies are enforced strongly in countries where total fertility rate is high. For the moment, we discuss a case without such policies. Therefore, the upper limit of n we suppose here might be too high. The probability that inequality 21 holds increases if the upper limit of n is lower.

  4. 4.

    Actually, total fertility rates in some economically developed countries are around 2. However, such countries tend to employ a strong family support policy. The value 2.05 here is the total fertility rate without such a policy. Therefore, we might say that this restriction tends to hold in many economically developed countries. The U.S., in which many immigrants contribute to high fertility rates, might be regarded as an exception.

References

  • Bagozzi RP, van Loo MF (1978) Fertility as consumption: theories from the behavioral sciences. J Consumer Res 4(4):199–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ, Becker GS (1989) Fertility choice in a model of economic growth. Econometrica 57(2):481–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudin T, de la Croix D, Gobbi PE (2020) Endogenous childlessness and stages of development. J Eur Econ Assoc 18(1):83–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS (1960) An economic analysis of fertility. In: Universities-National Bureau of Economic Research (ed) Demographic and economic change in developed countries. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 209–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS, Barro RJ (1988) A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility. Q J Econ 103(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galor O, Weil DN (1996) The gender gap, fertility, and growth. Am Econ Rev 86(3):374–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobbi PE (2013) A model of voluntary childlessness. J Popul Econ 26(3):963–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijdam L, Verbon H (1996) Aging and political decision making on public pensions. J Popul Econ 9(2):141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prettner K, Werner K (2016) Why it pays off to pay us well: the impact of basic research on economic growth and welfare. Res Policy 45(5):1075–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbon HAA, Verhoeven M (1992) Decision making on pension schemes under rational expectations. J Econ 56(1):71–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Nishimura K (1989) The old-age hypothesis revised. J Dev Econ 41(1):191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 18K01585. I wrote this article while I was staying at the Complutense University of Madrid (Universidad Complutense de Madrid). I have greatly benefited from Prof. Emilio Cerdá Tena and other staff who accepted me as a visiting researcher there. An earlier version of this research was presented at the ICEI research seminar (Seminario ICEI de Investigación), Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales (ICEI), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain, November 14, 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daisuke Ikazaki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ikazaki, D. (2021). Endogenous Fertility, Childlessness, and Economic Growth. In: Ikeshita, K., Ikazaki, D. (eds) Globalization, Population, and Regional Growth in the Knowledge-Based Economy. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 43. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0885-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics