Skip to main content

Polyamorous Parenthood: Kinship, Gender and Morality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Close Relations

Part of the book series: Crossroads of Knowledge ((CROKNOW))

Abstract

Research on polyamorous parenthood has mainly focused on aspects of interactions with schools and authorities, where polyamorous parents have had to develop strategies of openness and concealment and dealing with stigmatization (Palotta-Chiarolla, ‘To pass, border or pollute’: polyfamilies go to school. In: Barker M, Langdridge D (eds) Understanding non-monogamies. Routledge, New York, pp 182–187, 2010; Riggs, Developing a ‘responsible’ foster care praxis: Poly as a framework for examining power and propriety in family contexts. In: Barker M, Langdridge D (eds) Understanding non-monogamies. Routledge, New York, pp 188–200, 2010; Sheff, Strategies in polyamorous parenting. In: Barker M, Langdridge D (eds) Understanding non-monogamies. Routledge, New York, pp 169–181, 2010). Aspects of sex and morality have primarily been explored in general in relation to non-monogamous practice and not specifically in relation to parenthood (Ritchie, Discursive constructions of polyamory in mono-normative media culture. In: Barker M, Langdridge D (eds) Understanding non-monogamies. Routledge, New York, pp 46–54, 2010; Samuels, Promiscuities. Politics, imagination, spirituality and hypocrisy. In: Barker M, Langdridge D (eds) Understanding non-monogamies. Routledge, New York, pp 212–221, 2010). Based on interviews with 22 persons in Sweden who in different ways have experience of non-monogamous practice, we explore polyamorous parenthood, focusing on kinship practices, gender and sexual morality. The results of these analyses show that there are recurring themes of promiscuity as a risk that polyamorous parents have to handle. This can take the form of negative interactions with family members and society, practical issues with having sex with several partners or identity issues where good parenthood risks being at odds with non-monogamous practices. The boundaries of good parenthood and promiscuity and the negotiations between them are rarely highlighted in research, but have implications for the moral order of kinship for non-monogamous practice today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson, C. (2015). A genealogy of serial monogamy: Shifting regulations of intimacy in twentieth-century Sweden. Journal of Family History, 40(2), 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2002). Is kinship always already heterosexual? Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 13(1), 14–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haritaworn, J., Lin, C.-j., & Klesse, C. (2006). Poly/Logue: A critical introduction to polyamory. Sexualities, 9(5), 515–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, P. S. Y. (2006). The (charmed) circle game: Reflections on sexual hierarchy through multiple sexual relationships. Sexualities, 9(5), 547–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. A. (1992). Motherhood and representation. The mother in popular culture and melodrama. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klesse, C. (2006). Polyamory and its ‘others’: Contesting the terms of Non-monogamy. Sexualities, 9(5), 565–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klesse, C. (2007). The spectre of promiscuity: Gay male and bisexual Non-Monogamies and polyamories. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klesse, C. (2014). Poly economics—Capitalism, class, and polyamory. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 27(2), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klesse, C. (2019). Polyamorous parenting: Stigma, social regulation, and queer bonds of resistance. Sociological Research Online, 24(4), 625–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manley, M. H., Legge, M. M., Flanders, C. E., Goldberg, A. E., & Ross, L. E. (2018). Consensual nonmonogamy in pregnancy and parenthood: Experiences of bisexual and plurisexual women with different-gender partners. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 44(8), 721–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megan, A. M. C., Stinson, M. A., Bruce Ross, D., & Hjelmstad, L. R. (2015). Who’s in our clients’ bed? A case illustration of sex therapy with a polyamorous couple. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(2), 134–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallotta-Chiarolli, M. (2010). ‘To pass, border or pollute’: Polyfamilies go to school. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 182–187). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallotta-Chiarolli, M., Haydon, P., & Hunter, A. (2013). ‘These are our children’: Polyamorous parenting. In A. E. Goldberg & K. R. Allen (Eds.), LGBT-parent families. innovations in research and implications for practice (pp. 117–132). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1990). Discourse: Noun, verb or social practice? Philosophical Psychology, 3(2/3), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. W. (2010). Developing a ‘responsible’ foster care praxis: Poly as a framework for examining power and propriety in family contexts. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 188–200). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, A. (2010). Discursive constructions of polyamory in mono-normative media culture. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 46–54). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. (2011). Deviations. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, A. (2010). Promiscuities. Politics, imagination, spirituality and hypocrisy. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 212–221). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheff, E. (2010). Strategies in polyamorous parenting. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 169–181). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheff, E. (2011). Polyamorous families, same-sex marriage, and the slippery slope. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 40(5), 487–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender: Becoming respectable. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, M. (2006). A new entity in the history of sexuality: The respectable same-sex couple. Feminist Studies, 32(1), 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, G. (2006). Therapy with clients who are bisexual and polyamorous. Journal of Bisexuality, 6(1–2), 137–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catrine Andersson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Andersson, C., Carlström, C. (2021). Polyamorous Parenthood: Kinship, Gender and Morality. In: Wahlström Henriksson, H., Goedecke, K. (eds) Close Relations. Crossroads of Knowledge. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0792-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0792-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0791-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0792-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics