Skip to main content

Review of System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Models for Effective Application Delivery

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technology for Competitive Strategies (ICTCS 2020)

Abstract

There are different system development models, tools, and applications that have been designed and developed before the use of computers for processing of information, and there is an increase in demand of software with cheaper cost, having more functionality, faster delivery, and of high quality than how it was previously. Therefore, there is need to know the methods and their applications that would conform to the organizational requirements for successful system deployment. Each method has constructive criticisms with various advantages and disadvantages to the system that are of importance for deploying software in a manner such that it helps in good decision making on a chosen method for delivery within deadline and proper quality. This paper explained four commonly used system development methods namely; waterfall, iterative, agile, and rapid application development (RAD). It thereafter categorically assesses these methods on a comprehensive set of features and made an alternative analysis of the applicability of the methods based on system development life cycle tools which are requirement, design, implementation, and testing. This paper describes the system development life cycle (SDLC) tools and applications for successful system deployment and the constructive comparison that should serve as a tool in model selection for system development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Balaji, S., Murugaiyan, M.S.: Waterfall vs. V-model vs. agile: a comparative study on SDLC. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Bus. Manag. 2(1), 26–30 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berger, H., Beynon-Davies, P.: The utility of rapid application development in large‐scale, complex projects. Inf. Syst. J. 19(6), 549–570 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berra, Y.: Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). DePaul Univ. 2 12, 2012. https://condor.depaul.edu/jpetlick/extra/394/Session2.ppt (2012)

  4. Dennis, A., Wixom, B.H., Roth, R.M.: Systems Analysis and Design. Wiley & Sons (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Highsmith, J., Cockburn, A.: Agile software development: the business of innovation. Computer (Long. Beach. Calif) 34(9), 120–127 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kosta, E., Pitkänen, O., Niemelä, M., Kaasinen, E.: Mobile-centric ambient intelligence in health-and homecare—anticipating ethical and legal challenges. Sci. Eng. Ethics 16(2), 303–323 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Land, S.K., Smith, D.B., Walz, J.W.: Practical Support for Lean Six Sigma Software Process Definition: Using IEEE Software Engineering Standards, vol. 70. Wiley (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Petersen, K., Wohlin, C., Baca, D.: The waterfall model in large-scale development. In: International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, pp. 386–400 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tiruneh, T., Mishra, M.K.: Analysis and performance evaluation of requirement elicitation techniques. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 6(4), 118–123 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tiwari, S., Rathore, S.S.: A methodology for the selection of requirement elicitation techniques 3(2), 212–217 (2017). arXiv Prepr. arXiv1709.08481

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tousif, R., Khan, M.N.A., Riaz, N.: Analysis of requirement engineering processes, tools/techniques and methodologies. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci. 5(3), 40–48 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Unhelkar, B.: The Art of Agile Practice: A Composite Approach for Projects and Organizations. Auerbach Publications (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yousuf, M., Asger, M.: Comparison of various requirements elicitation techniques. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 116(4) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Olorunshola, O.E., Ogwueleka, F.N. (2022). Review of System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Models for Effective Application Delivery. In: Joshi, A., Mahmud, M., Ragel, R.G., Thakur, N.V. (eds) Information and Communication Technology for Competitive Strategies (ICTCS 2020). Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 191. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0739-4_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics