Skip to main content

Performance Analysis of Duobinary and CSRZ Modulation Formats on Self-Phase Modulation Effect in Optical Communication Network Using Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Next Generation of Internet of Things

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 201))

  • 883 Accesses

Abstract

With advancement in the field of atomic scale fabrication and increase in demand for high data traffic, optical communication has become the backbone of modern-day communication. It offers low attenuation, high capacity and low power consumption in a long-haul communication environment. Though optical communication has a lot of advantages, it also gets affected by the detrimental effects like dispersion and nonlinearities. This article presents a detailed analysis on the impact of duobinary and carrier suppressed return to zero (CSRZ) modulation formats on unfavorable nonlinear self-phase modulation. Here, simulations are carried out by using optisystem software, and the performance of the design is measured in terms of bit error rate (BER) and Q factor. Furthermore, fiber Bragg grating (FBG) is used in the receiver end to combat the dispersion caused due the pulse spreading. Finally, a comparison is made between the performances of both the modulation formats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gall HL, Jamet JP (1971) Theory of the elastic and ınelastic scattering of light by magnetic crystals. In: First‐order processes, vol 46, ıssue. 2. Wiley Online Library

    Google Scholar 

  2. Santhanam P, Prober DE (1984) Inelastic electron scattering mechanisms in clean aluminum films. Res Gate, Phys Rev 29(6)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffmann MC, Brandt NC, Hwang HY, Yeh KL, Nelson KA (2009) Terahertz Kerr effect. AIP Appl Phys Lett 95(23)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sihval NK, Garg AK (2015) Simulation and analysis of self phase modulation fiber non linearity. J Multidisc Eng Sci Technol (JMEST) 2(6). ISSN: 3159-0040

    Google Scholar 

  5. Agrawal GP (2019) Cross-phase modulation. In: Nonlinear fiber optics, 6th edn, Chap 7, pp 245–295

    Google Scholar 

  6. Panada TK, Patra KC, Barapanda NK, Rao MM, Mishra P (2016) Comparison of dispersion compensation performance using fiber bragg grating and dispersion compensating fiber of a standard fiber optic link. Int J Concept Comput Inf Technol 4(4)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mendez AJ, Morookian JM (2002) Return-to-zero (RZ) modulation of multifrequency lasers (MFLs) for application to optical CDMA. Int Soc Opt Eng 4653

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liang H, Li W, Linze N, Chen L (2010) Comparison of return-to-zero and non-return-to-zero coded pulses. In: 9th ınternational conference on optical communications and networks (ICOCN 2010), IEEE Xplore

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bobrovs V, Porins J, Ivanovs G (2007) Influence of nonlinear optical effects on the NRZ and RZ modulation signals in WDM systems. Electron Electr Eng Technol 4(76):55–58

    Google Scholar 

  10. Udayakumar R, Khanaa V, Saravanan T (2013) Chromatic dispersion compensation in optical fiber communication system and its simulation. Indian J Sci Technol (IJST) 616(33959)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rostami A, Oskouei MS (2006) Investigation of chromatic dispersion and pulse broadening factor of two new multi-clad optical fibers. Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur (IJCSNS) 6(8)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Suda A, Takeda T (2012) Effects of nonlinear chirp on the self-phase modulation of ultra short optical pulse. Appl Sci 2(2):549–557

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shake I, Takara H, Kawanishi S (2003) Simple Q factor monitoring for BER estimation using opened eye diagrams captured by high-speed asynchronous electrooptical sampling. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 15(4)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yahya CB (2005) Analysis of optical performance monitoring methods based on Q factor and bit error rate estimation. In: Second IFIP ınternational conference on wireless and optical communications networks (WOCN 2005). Published by IEEE Xplore

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jadon U, Nain H, Mishra V (2016) Analysis of duo-binary modulation scheme in single channel on the basis of BER. In: International conference on recent trends in electronics, ınformation and communication technology (RTEICT 2016). IEEE Xplore

    Google Scholar 

  16. Selvendran S, Avaninathan S, Kadarkarai EM (2018) Investigation on the ınfluence of duobinary and CSRZ modulation formats on self phase modulation effect in optical communication network. Int J Sci Res Phys Appl Sci (IJSRPAS 2018) 6(4):17–22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Panda, T., Mukesh Kumar Behera, A.B., Kumari, G., Polei, S. (2021). Performance Analysis of Duobinary and CSRZ Modulation Formats on Self-Phase Modulation Effect in Optical Communication Network Using Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG). In: Kumar, R., Mishra, B.K., Pattnaik, P.K. (eds) Next Generation of Internet of Things. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 201. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0666-3_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics