Skip to main content
  • 163 Accesses

Abstract

According to the anatomical features of different stages of cataract or the degree of damage to visual function, lens opacity can be classified and graded, which is conducive to the standardization of cataract-related research. Currently, the evaluation methods of lens opacity used in clinic and research are mainly divided into two categories: subjective methods and objective methods. The former includes morphological and anatomical classification methods, such as Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III) [1], Oxford clinical cataract classification and grading system (OCCCGS) [2, 3], and the Visual Function Index-14 (VF-14) questionnaire [4, 5] for evaluating the patient’s quality of life. These methods are often time-consuming and may suffer from the response or inter-rater bias owing to their subjective nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The lens opacities classification system III. The longitudinal study of cataract study group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(6):831–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sparrow JM, Bron AJ, Brown NA, et al. The Oxford clinical cataract classification and grading system. Int Ophthalmol. 1986;9(4):207–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hall AB, Thompson JR, Deane JS, et al. LOCS III versus the Oxford Clinical Cataract Classification and Grading System for the assessment of nuclear, cortical and posterior subcapsular cataract. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1997;4(4):179–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alonso J, Espallargues M, Andersen TF, et al. International applicability of the VF-14. An index of visual function in patients with cataracts. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(5):799–807.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cassard SD, Patrick DL, Damiano AM, et al. Reproducibility and responsiveness of the VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataracts. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(12):1508–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grewal DS, Brar GS, Grewal SP. Correlation of nuclear cataract lens density using Scheimpflug images with Lens Opacities Classification System III and visual function. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(8):1436–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pei X, Bao Y, Chen Y, Li X. Correlation of lens density measured using the Pentacam Scheimpflug system with the Lens Opacities Classification System III grading score and visual acuity in age-related nuclear cataract. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(11):1471–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ortiz D, Alio JL, Ruiz-Colecha J, et al. Grading nuclear cataract opacity by densitometry and objective optical analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(8):1345–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Artal P, Benito A, Perez GM, et al. An objective scatter index based on double-pass retinal images of a point source to classify cataracts. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e16823.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cabot F, Saad A, McAlinden C, et al. Objective assessment of crystalline lens opacity level by measuring ocular light scattering with a double-pass system. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155(4):629–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim SA, Hwang J, Hwang KY, et al. Objective assessment of nuclear cataract: comparison of double-pass and Scheimpflug systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(5):716–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vilaseca M, Romero MJ, Arjona M, et al. Grading nuclear, cortical and posterior subcapsular cataracts using an objective scatter index measured with a double-pass system. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(9):1204–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pan AP, Wang QM, Huang F, et al. Correlation among lens opacities classification system III grading, visual function index-14, pentacam nucleus staging, and objective scatter index for cataract assessment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(2):241–247 e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fujikado T, Kuroda T, Maeda N, et al. Light scattering and optical aberrations as objective parameters to predict visual deterioration in eyes with cataracts. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(6):1198–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Waard PW, JK IJ, van den Berg TJ, et al. Intraocular light scattering in age-related cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33(3):618–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 People's Medical Publishing House, PR of China

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yu, AY. (2021). Objective Grading of Cataract. In: Yu, AY. (eds) Double-pass Optical Quality Analysis for the Clinical Practice of Cataract. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0435-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0435-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0434-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0435-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics