Skip to main content

A Fuzzy Set-Based Energy Consumption Model of Selective Laser Sintering

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Next Generation Materials and Processing Technologies

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Materials ((SPM,volume 9))

  • 843 Accesses

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) has gained enormous attention in the present digital era of sustainable manufacturing. It is commonly known as 3D printing and is one of the foundations of Industry 4.0. This article presents a fuzzy set-based methodology for the estimation of energy consumption of a common AM process, viz., selective laser sintering (SLS). SLS is a powder bed fusion AM process that uses raw material in the form of a polymeric powder to fabricate prototypes as well as end-usable parts made of plastics. The energy estimation of SLS is important for the comparison of its efficiency with other manufacturing processes and the assessment of its sustainability. The various energy consumption elements of SLS process are described. Initially, a deterministic energy estimation model comprising necessary parameters is presented. The deterministic model is then converted to a fuzzy set-based model for handling uncertainties in the energy estimation. For this, the uncertain parameters are considered as fuzzy and suitable fuzzy arithmetic operations are performed. For simplicity, linear triangular fuzzy numbers are used in this work for uncertain parameters. Construction of fuzzy membership functions for input parameters is based on the low, most likely and high estimates of experts. As a result of computations using fuzzy arithmetic, energy consumption can be obtained as a fuzzy number. The developed energy consumption model is demonstrated by examples of two different parts fabricated by SLS. Energy consumption is obtained for a single quantity as well as for multiple quantities of the same part. Full utilization of the machine chamber yields the minimum energy consumption per quantity. For example, energy consumption reduced by 81% for a part, when 18 quantities were made instead of just a single quantity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mognol P, Lepicart D, Perry N (2006) Rapid prototyping: energy and environment in the spotlight. Rapid Prototyp J 12(1):26–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540610637246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sreenivasan R, Bourell D (2010) Sustainability study in selective laser sintering—an energy perspective. Minerals, Metals and Materials Society/AIME, 420 Commonwealth Dr., P. O. Box 430 Warrendale PA 15086 USA. 14–18 Feb

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baumers M, Tuck C, Bourell DL, Sreenivasan R, Hague R (2011) Sustainability of additive manufacturing: measuring the energy consumption of the laser sintering process. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Eng Manuf 225(12):2228–2239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405411406044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Paul R, Anand S (2012) Process energy analysis and optimization in selective laser sintering. J Manuf Sys 31(4):429–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Meteyer S, Xu X, Perry N, Zhao YF (2014) Energy and material flow analysis of binder-jetting additive manufacturing processes. Proc CIRP 15:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kellens K, Renaldi R, Dewulf W, Kruth JP, Duflou JR (2014) Environmental impact modeling of selective laser sintering processes. Rapid Prototyp J 20(6):459–470. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-02-2013-0018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peng T (2016) Analysis of energy utilization in 3D printing processes. Proc CIRP 40:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang Y, Li L, Pan Y, Sun Z (2017) Energy consumption modeling of stereolithography-based additive manufacturing toward environmental sustainability. J Indus Eco 21(S1):168–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Morrow WR, Qi H, Kim I, Mazumder J, Skerlos SJ (2007) Environmental aspects of laser-based and conventional tool and die manufacturing. J Clean Prod 15(10):932–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ullah AS, Hashimoto H, Kubo A, Tamaki JI (2013) Sustainability analysis of rapid prototyping: material/resource and process perspectives. Int J Sustain Manuf 3(1):20–36. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSM.2013.058640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Telenko C, Seepersad CC (2012) A comparison of the energy efficiency of selective laser sintering and injection molding of nylon parts. Rapid Prototyp J 18(6):472–481. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541211272018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma F, Dixit US (2019) Fuzzy set based cost model of additive manufacturing with specific example of selective laser sintering. J Mech Sci Technol 33(9):4439–4449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0840-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Franco A, Romoli L (2012) Characterization of laser energy consumption in sintering of polymer based powders. J Mat Process Technol 212(4):917–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.12.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2014) Additive manufacturing technologies, vol 17. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Nan W, Pasha M, Ghadiri M (2020) Numerical simulation of particle flow and segregation during roller spreading process in additive manufacturing. Powder Technol 364:811–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.12.023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Haeri S, Wang Y, Ghita O, Sun J (2016) Discrete element simulation and experimental study of powder spreading process in additive manufacturing. Powder Technol 306:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.11.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. https://xyzwebsite.blob.core.windows.net/wwwportal/MfgPro230%20xS%20_SPEC_171006-2.pdf. Accessed on 5 July 2020

  18. https://homeguides.sfgate.com/much-electricity-quartz-infrared-heater-use-87458.html#:~:text=Quartz%20infrared%20heaters%20use%20as,of%20750%20to%201500%20watts. Accessed on 5 July 2020

  19. https://www.arptech.com.au/data/sls-duraform.pdf. Accessed on 5 July 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faladrum Sharma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sharma, F., Dixit, U.S. (2021). A Fuzzy Set-Based Energy Consumption Model of Selective Laser Sintering. In: Bag, S., Paul, C.P., Baruah, M. (eds) Next Generation Materials and Processing Technologies. Springer Proceedings in Materials, vol 9. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0182-8_40

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics