Abstract
Design entrance exams are common nowadays for securing admission to design schools in India, be it private or public institutes. Students are often examined during these competitive exams to test their creative aptitude. Over the years, format of design entrance exams in India has gone through innumerable changes. In some formats, objective questions are preferred, in some subjective tests are conducted, while few prefer a combination of both lack of a standardized format of testing creativity across design schools in India, unlike engineering and medical colleges, raises questions like (1) Do these design entrance tests really capture creativity to its fullest? (2) Do they conform to any standardized format of creativity testing? The study reported in this paper intends to investigate these questions by conducting a detailed comparative study of existing entrance exam formats of Design Schools of India. A detailed analytical approach by using affinity mapping and generating open codes was used to classify and categorize question formats of different Indian Design entrance exams. The open codes were then mapped with the extracted factors of the literature review with an objective to identify the factors confirming to creativity evaluation. The results highlight that existing entrance exam, while capturing major factors for creativity evaluation, lacks in capturing a few essential factors that provide greater insight into the creative instincts of an individual assessed. A model for standardization of creativity assessment has also been suggested based on the study results. This study would provide new light into the nature of design-based entrance examinations in India and might lead the way toward a standardized Design entrance exam in the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sarkar, P., Chakrabarti, A.: Assessing design creativity. Des. Stud. 32(4), 348–383 (2011)
Srinivasan, V., Chakrabarti, A.: Design for novelty–a framework? In DS 48: Proceedings DESIGN 2008, The 10th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia (2008)
Lobert, B.M., & Dologite, D.G.: Measuring creativity of information system ideas: an exploratory investigation. In: 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (1994)
Amabile, T.M.: Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 43(5), 997 (1982)
Shaheen, R.: Creativity and education. Creativity Educ. 1(03), 166 (2010)
Cropley, A.J.: Creativity in Education & Learning: A Guide for Teachers and Educators. Psychology Press (2001)
Craft, A., Jeffrey, B., Leibling, M. (eds.): Creativity in Education. A&C Black (2001)
Gemmell, B., Vyas, P.: The Future of Design Education in India, pp. 1–36. British Council. https://www.britishcouncil.in/sites/default/files/the_future_of_design_education_in_india.pdf (2016)
Sharma, A., Kirloskar, V.: India Design Report. India Design Council. CII National Committee on Design, pp. 1–120. https://www.cii.in/webcms/Upload/a2.pdf (2008)
Kaufman, J.C., Sternberg, R.J.: (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press (2010)
Gigerenzer, G.: Where do new ideas come from. In: Dimensions of Creativity, pp. 53–74 (1994)
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Wolfe, R.: New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In: The Systems Model of Creativity, pp. 161–184. Springer, Dordrecht (2014)
Pritzker, S.R., Runco, M.A. (ed.): Encyclopedia of Creativity. Academic Press/Elsevier (2011)
Kaufman, J.C., Plucker, J.A., Russell, C.M.: Identifying and assessing creativity as a component of giftedness. J. Psychoeduc. Assess. 30(1), 60–73 (2012)
Silvia, P.J.: Creativity and intelligence revisited: a latent variable analysis of Wallach and Kogan. Creativity Res. J. 20(1), 34–39 (2008)
Getzels, J.W., Jackson, P.W.: Creativity and Intelligence: Explorations with Gifted Students. Wiley (1962)
Park, N.K., Chun, M.Y., Lee, J.: Revisiting individual creativity assessment: triangulation in subjective and objective assessment methods. Creativity Res. J. 28(1), 1–10 (2016)
https://www.ceed.iitb.ac.in/2021/. Accessed 24 June 2020
https://www.shiksha.com/. Accessed 07 Oct 2020
https://www.ndtv.com/. Accessed 07 Oct 2020
Grace, K., Maher, M.L., Fisher, D., Brady, K.: Data-intensive evaluation of design creativity using novelty, value, and surprise. Int. J. Des. Creativity Innov. 3(3–4), 125–147 (2015)
Mohanani, R., Turhan, B., Ralph, P.: Requirements framing affects design creativity. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. (2019)
Liu, Z., Jansen, B.J.: Subjective versus objective questions: Perception of question subjectivity in social Q&A. In: International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction, pp. 131–140. Springer, Cham (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chaudhuri, N.B., Dhar, D., Yammiyavar, P.G. (2021). Do Design Entrance Exams in India Really Test Creative Aptitude? An Analytical Study of Design Tests Conforming Creativity Benchmarks. In: Chakrabarti, A., Poovaiah, R., Bokil, P., Kant, V. (eds) Design for Tomorrow—Volume 2. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 222. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0119-4_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0119-4_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0118-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0119-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)