Skip to main content

Do Design Entrance Exams in India Really Test Creative Aptitude? An Analytical Study of Design Tests Conforming Creativity Benchmarks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design for Tomorrow—Volume 2

Abstract

Design entrance exams are common nowadays for securing admission to design schools in India, be it private or public institutes. Students are often examined during these competitive exams to test their creative aptitude. Over the years, format of design entrance exams in India has gone through innumerable changes. In some formats, objective questions are preferred, in some subjective tests are conducted, while few prefer a combination of both lack of a standardized format of testing creativity across design schools in India, unlike engineering and medical colleges, raises questions like (1) Do these design entrance tests really capture creativity to its fullest? (2) Do they conform to any standardized format of creativity testing? The study reported in this paper intends to investigate these questions by conducting a detailed comparative study of existing entrance exam formats of Design Schools of India. A detailed analytical approach by using affinity mapping and generating open codes was used to classify and categorize question formats of different Indian Design entrance exams. The open codes were then mapped with the extracted factors of the literature review with an objective to identify the factors confirming to creativity evaluation. The results highlight that existing entrance exam, while capturing major factors for creativity evaluation, lacks in capturing a few essential factors that provide greater insight into the creative instincts of an individual assessed. A model for standardization of creativity assessment has also been suggested based on the study results. This study would provide new light into the nature of design-based entrance examinations in India and might lead the way toward a standardized Design entrance exam in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sarkar, P., Chakrabarti, A.: Assessing design creativity. Des. Stud. 32(4), 348–383 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Srinivasan, V., Chakrabarti, A.: Design for novelty–a framework? In DS 48: Proceedings DESIGN 2008, The 10th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lobert, B.M., & Dologite, D.G.: Measuring creativity of information system ideas: an exploratory investigation. In: 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amabile, T.M.: Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 43(5), 997 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shaheen, R.: Creativity and education. Creativity Educ. 1(03), 166 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cropley, A.J.: Creativity in Education & Learning: A Guide for Teachers and Educators. Psychology Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Craft, A., Jeffrey, B., Leibling, M. (eds.): Creativity in Education. A&C Black (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gemmell, B., Vyas, P.: The Future of Design Education in India, pp. 1–36. British Council. https://www.britishcouncil.in/sites/default/files/the_future_of_design_education_in_india.pdf (2016)

  9. Sharma, A., Kirloskar, V.: India Design Report. India Design Council. CII National Committee on Design, pp. 1–120. https://www.cii.in/webcms/Upload/a2.pdf (2008)

  10. Kaufman, J.C., Sternberg, R.J.: (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gigerenzer, G.: Where do new ideas come from. In: Dimensions of Creativity, pp. 53–74 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Wolfe, R.: New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In: The Systems Model of Creativity, pp. 161–184. Springer, Dordrecht (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pritzker, S.R., Runco, M.A. (ed.): Encyclopedia of Creativity. Academic Press/Elsevier (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaufman, J.C., Plucker, J.A., Russell, C.M.: Identifying and assessing creativity as a component of giftedness. J. Psychoeduc. Assess. 30(1), 60–73 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Silvia, P.J.: Creativity and intelligence revisited: a latent variable analysis of Wallach and Kogan. Creativity Res. J. 20(1), 34–39 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Getzels, J.W., Jackson, P.W.: Creativity and Intelligence: Explorations with Gifted Students. Wiley (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Park, N.K., Chun, M.Y., Lee, J.: Revisiting individual creativity assessment: triangulation in subjective and objective assessment methods. Creativity Res. J. 28(1), 1–10 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. https://www.ceed.iitb.ac.in/2021/. Accessed 24 June 2020

  19. https://www.shiksha.com/. Accessed 07 Oct 2020

  20. https://www.ndtv.com/. Accessed 07 Oct 2020

  21. Grace, K., Maher, M.L., Fisher, D., Brady, K.: Data-intensive evaluation of design creativity using novelty, value, and surprise. Int. J. Des. Creativity Innov. 3(3–4), 125–147 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mohanani, R., Turhan, B., Ralph, P.: Requirements framing affects design creativity. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, Z., Jansen, B.J.: Subjective versus objective questions: Perception of question subjectivity in social Q&A. In: International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction, pp. 131–140. Springer, Cham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debayan Dhar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chaudhuri, N.B., Dhar, D., Yammiyavar, P.G. (2021). Do Design Entrance Exams in India Really Test Creative Aptitude? An Analytical Study of Design Tests Conforming Creativity Benchmarks. In: Chakrabarti, A., Poovaiah, R., Bokil, P., Kant, V. (eds) Design for Tomorrow—Volume 2. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 222. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0119-4_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0119-4_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0118-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0119-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics