Skip to main content

Renewable Energy Development, Export-Led Industrialisation, and Its Implications for Climate Strategies in Asian Developing Countries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Renewable Energy Transition in Asia
  • 393 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter investigates how, and under what conditions, growth strategies can include attempts to moderate the negative effects of their strategies on climate change. In particular, it focuses on the possibilities for developing countries seeking to industrialise to make use of the current focus on renewables in order to meet climate change targets while continuing with their industrialisation strategies. The main argument is that a shift to renewable energy is not inconsistent with an industrialisation process if the latter is export-oriented and some or most of the initial costs of switching to renewable energy are borne by the state.

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr Howard Nicholas (International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam) for the invaluable inputs and guidance, and Dr Nanda Kumar Janardhanan (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies) for the useful feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The main aim of the energy transition is to achieve the zero-carbon by 2050.

  2. 2.

    Other possible solutions at present include energy efficiency improvement and utilisation of CCUS (Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage).

  3. 3.

    60% of this will be accounted by the solar PV followed by 25% of onshore wind.

  4. 4.

    A large number of co-benefits are foreseen by addressing the climate change, such as the improving access to the energy, eradication of energy poverty and increasing health benefits, which are often linking with SDGs.

  5. 5.

    There is a debate whether nuclear can also be regarded as renewables or not. This chapter excludes nuclear, mainly due to the data availability.

  6. 6.

    For example, under the UNFCCC, the Parties agreed to set the collective goal of 100 billion USD per year by 2020.

  7. 7.

    The financial instruments available include grants, debt, equity, green bond, FIT (Feed-in-tariffs) and guarantees.

  8. 8.

    It is also referred as the total overnight cost.

  9. 9.

    The majority of studies typically estimate the cost with the levelised cost of electricity (LCOE), taking the capital cost also into consideration.

  10. 10.

    Data is from “Total primary energy supply (TPES) by source, World 1990–2017” (see IEA, database).

  11. 11.

    Similar trend is also seen in electricity capacity.

  12. 12.

    The countries are classified based on the World Bank’s per capita income levels as of 2019. Following the widely used classification, high income countries are regarded as advanced countries, and the rest consisted of upper middle-, lower middle-, and low- income countries are classified as developing countries. The composite is developed for the countries that data is available by both IRENA and World Bank (see database section).

  13. 13.

    Marine energy is excluded from the table as the rounded figure is zero for all the income levels.

  14. 14.

    No data is provided for the small hydropower.

  15. 15.

    It consists of South East, East, and South Asian countries, excluding the high-income countries. High income countries are Brunei Darussalam, Hong Kong SAR, Japan, Korea Rep., Macau SAR, and Singapore.

  16. 16.

    Author’s composite. Countries are classified based on the availability of renewable electricity generation in IRENA, and per capita income and merchandise export by World Bank in 2017, except Afghanistan, Cambodia, and Lao PDR. For these three countries, 2016 data is used for export data as a proxy.

  17. 17.

    Marine technology is excluded from both figures as the figure is zero.

  18. 18.

    The analysis in developing countries as a whole also derived the similar results in general.

  19. 19.

    In 2017, Asia’s solar generation accounts for roughly half of the world.

  20. 20.

    For developing countries as a whole, Brazil and Indonesia account for 71% and 13% of total bioenergy generation in non-manufacturing export-based economies respectively.

  21. 21.

    India’s export has been dominated by the manufacturing products since 1980s, which account for around 70% of total merchandise exports.

  22. 22.

    Both India and Lao PDR are considered as service-based economies based on GDP composition. The shares of service, industry and agriculture sectors are 50%, 32% and 16% respectively for Lao PDR, and roughly 50%, 27% and 15% of GDP respectively for India in 2017 (see WDI database).

  23. 23.

    For example, the solar PV industry imports 90% of the solar cell from China. The concessional loans for the solar project come from Germany, the U.S., and World Bank (see Bloomberg NEF 2019).

  24. 24.

    See Indian Trade Portal for more details; https://www.indiantradeportal.in/vs.jsp?lang=0&id=0,25,857,3901

  25. 25.

    The recent COVID-19 outbreak and the subsequent lockdown has posed a greater challenge in India, through disruption of the supply chain, halting the production process, and fall in the global demand. India is attempting not only to increase domestic production but also to attract more foreign investment as one of the destinations for the relocation of supply chain away from China by creating a favourable business environment.

  26. 26.

    Electricity export accounts for 26% of total exports in 2017 (OECD 2018).

  27. 27.

    Negative environmental consequences and the impact of livelihood and biosphere by the construction of dams have been well-reported (see, for example, Blake and Barney 2018).

  28. 28.

    The governments suffer from budget deficit since 2000, and persistent current account trade deficit since 1980s (OECD/Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia 2018).

References

  • Altenburg, T., and T. Engelmeier. 2013. Boosting Solar Investment with Limited Subsidies: Rent Management and Policy Learning in India. Energy Policy 59: 866–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amponsah, N.Y., M. Troldborg, B. Kington, I. Aalders, and R.L. Hough. 2014. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Renewable Energy Sources: A Review of Lifecycle Considerations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 39: 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R. (2018). Flat Investment Levels: End to RE Cost Reductions? The Energy Connected Group, Energy Central. Available at https://www.energycentral.com/c/ec/flat-investment-levels-end-re-cost-reductions

  • Best, R. 2017. Switching Towards Coal or Renewable Energy? The Effects of Financial Capital on Energy Transition. Energy Economics 63: 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, U. 2019. Foreign Investors Pumped $1.02 bn Equity in India’s Clean Energy Space in FY19. Mint, 13 July 2019. Available at https://www.livemint.com/industry/energy/foreign-investors-pumped-1-02-bn-equity-in-india-s-clean-energy-space-in-fy19-1562984674870.html

  • Blake, D.J.H., and K. Barney. 2018. Structural Injustice, Slow Violence? The Political Ecology of “Best Practice” Hydropower Dam in Lao PDR. Journal of Contemporary Asia 48 (5): 808–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg NEF. 2019. Global Solar Investment Report: State of Solar Markets and Role of Concessional Finance in ISA Member Countries, October 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscore, J. 1999. The Financing of Hydropower, Irrigation and Water Supply Infrastructure in Developing Countries. International Journal of Water Resources Development 15 (4): 459–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T.W., T. Bischof-Niemz, K. Blok, C. Breyer, H. Lund, and B.V. Mathiesen. 2018. Response to “Burden of Proof: A Comprehensive Review of the Feasibility of 100% Renewable-Electricity Systems”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 92: 834–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, S. 2013. Manufacturing Trade Deficit and Industrial Policy in India. Economic and Political Weekly 48 (8): 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Coninck, H., and A. Sager. 2015. Making Sense of Policy for Climate Technology Development and Transfer. Climate Policy 15 (1): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donastorg, A., S. Renukappa, and S. Suresh. 2017. Financing Renewable Energy Projects in Developing Countries: A Critical Review. IOP Conference Series, Earth and Environmental Science 83. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/83/1/012012

  • Economic Forum. 2020. The Global Risks Report 2020: Insight Report. 15th edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA. 2018. Direct Federal Financial Interventions and Subsidies in Energy in Fiscal Year 2016, April. U.S. Energy Information Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Solar Explained: Solar Energy and the Development. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Available at https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/solar/solar-energy-and-the-environment.php

  • ———. 2020. Annual Energy Outlook 2019: With Projection to 2050, January. U.S. Energy Information Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felipe, J., U. Kumar, and A. Abdon. 2013. Exports, Capabilities, and Industrial Policy in India. Journal of Comparative Economics 41: 939–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, G. 1992. Renewable Energy in Third World Development Assistance: Learning from Experience. Energy Policy 20 (4): 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnanasagaran, A. 2018. Lao PDR: Southeast Asia’s Factory. ASEAN Post, July 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith-Jones, S., J.A. Ocampo, and S. Spratt. 2012. Financing Renewable Energy in Developing Countries: Mechanisms and Responsibilities. Background Paper to the European Report on Development 2011/2012: Confronting Scarcity: Managing Water, Energy and Land for Inclusive and Sustainable Growth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R.E., and J. Xie. 2011. Mekong Hydropower Development. Science 332 (6026): 178–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.R. 2020. Financing India’s Renewable Energy Vision. Issue Brief No. 336, January. Observer Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, M.Z. 2013. Financing Renewable Energy Options for Developing Financing Instruments Using Public Funds. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA. 2019a. Renewables 2019: Analysis and Forecasts to 2024, Market Report Series. Paris: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019b. World Energy Outlook 2019. Paris: IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. 2019. Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Article IV Consultation, Press Release. IMF Country Report, No. 19/267. International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRENA. 2017. Perspectives for the Energy Transition: Investment Needs for a Low-Carbon Energy System. March. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019a. Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019b. Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2018. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junginger, M., J. Koppejan, and C.S. Goh. 2019. Sustainable Bioenergy Deployment in East and South East Asia: Notes on Recent Trend. Sustainability Science, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00712-w.

  • Kaldor, N. 1967. Strategic Factors in Economic Development. Ithaca/New York: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khare, V., S. Nema, and P. Baredar. 2013. Status of Solar Wind Renewable Energy in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review 27: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchherr, J., and N. Matthews. 2018. Technology Transfer in the Hydropower Industry: An Analysis of Chinese Developers’ Undertakings in Europe and Latin America. Energy Policy 113: 546–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchherr, J., and F. Urban. 2018. Technology Transfer Cooperation for Low Carbon Energy Technology: Analysing 30 Years of Scholarship and Proposing a Research Agenda. Energy Policy 113: 600–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothawade, N.S. 2017. Green Manufacturing: Solution for Indian Climate Change Commitment and Make in India. International Journal of Science and Research 6 (1): 725–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozloff, K. 1995. Rethinking Development Assistance for Renewable Electric Power. Renewable Energy 6 (3): 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louie, H. 2019. Off-Grid Electrical Systems in Developing Countries. Cham: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthra, S., S. Kumar, D. Garg, and A. Haleem. 2015. Barriers to Renewable/Sustainable Energy Technologies Adoption: Indian Perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review 41: 772–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J.A. 2014. Greening of Capitalism: How Asia Is Driving the Next Great Transformation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M., and G. Semieniuk. 2018. Financing Renewable Energy: Who Is Financing What and Why It Matters. Technological Forecasting & Social Change: 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meizels, A. 2000. Economic Dependence on Commodities. High Round Table on Trade and Development: Directions for the Twenty-First Century, February 12. Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2017. Investing in Climate, Investing in Growth. Paris: OECD publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Climate Finance Provided and Mobilised by Developed Countries in 2013–17. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD/Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia. 2018. Lao PDR. In SME Policy Index: ASEAN 2018: Boosting Competitiveness and Inclusive Growth, SME Policy Index, 285–319. Jakarta/Paris: OECD Publishing/ERIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okerere, C., A. Coke, M. Geebreyesus, T. Ginbo, J.J. Wakeford, and Y. Mulugetta. 2019. Governing Green Industrialisation in Africa: Assessing Key Parameters for a Sustainable Socio-Technical Transition in the Context of Ethiopia. World Development 115: 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pueyo, A., and P. Linares. 2012. Renewable Technology Transfer to Developing Countries: One Size Does Not Fit All. Institute of Development Studies, November, IDS Working Paper, 412. https://www.ids.ac.uk/publications/renewable-technology-transfer-to-developing-countries-one-size-does-not-fit-all/

  • Qurashi, M.M., and T. Hussain. 2012. Renewable Energy Technologies for Developing Countries: Now and to 2023. Rabat: Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • REN21. 2019. Renewables 2019: Global Status Report. Paris: REN21 Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reserve Bank of India. 2019. Monetary Policy Report. April, Available at https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/BS_ViewBulletin.aspx?Id=18168

  • Rodrik, D. 2014. Green Industrial Policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 30: 469–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J., W.T. Woo, N. Yoshino, and F. Taghizadeh-Hesary. 2019. Handbook of Green Finance; Energy Security and Sustainable Development. Singapore:Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi, G.K. 2018. Green Energy Finance in India: Challenges and Solutions. Asian Development Bank Institute. Working Paper, No. 863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B.K., and G. Walter. 2019. Internationalizing the Political Economy of Hydroelectricity: Security Development and Sustainability in Hydropower States. Review of International Political Economy 26 (1): 49–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steckel, R.H., and R. Floud, eds. 1997. Health and Welfare During Industrialization. Chicago: University Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, B. 2019. Estimating the Cost of Capital for Renewable Energy Project. USAEE, Working Paper, No. 19-399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storm, S., and C.W.N. Naastepad. 2005. Strategic Factors in Economic Development: East Asian Industrialization 1950–2003. Development and Change 36 (6): 1059–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, F. 2018. China’s Rise: Challenging the North-South Technology Transfer Paradigm for Climate Change Mitigation and Low Carbon Energy. Energy Policy 113: 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute. 2019. Climate Finance. Available at https://www.wri.org/our-work/project/climate-finance/climate-finance-and-private-sector

  • Yüksel, I. 2019. Development of Hydropower: A Case Study in Developing Countries. Energy Sources, Part B 2: 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Databases

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ikeda, E. (2021). Renewable Energy Development, Export-Led Industrialisation, and Its Implications for Climate Strategies in Asian Developing Countries. In: Janardhanan, N., Chaturvedi, V. (eds) Renewable Energy Transition in Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8905-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8905-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8904-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8905-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics