Skip to main content

Review of Successful Strategies for Adopting Offsite Construction Technology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (CRIOCM 2019)

Abstract

The adoption of Offsite Construction technology (OCT) has been viewed as a sustainable way of improving performance in the construction industry. The awareness and interest of OCT are increasing in all countries. Literature has repetitively appreciated the advantages, barriers and associated strategies for the adoption of OCT. Numerous studies have demonstrated the successful strategies for adoption of OCT in the global construction community. However, these strategies are seldom reviewed or classified especially in developing country context. Focusing on Tanzania construction industry this study aims to review and classify the strategies for promoting the adoption of OCT. The study adopted a mixed quantitative and qualitative, 29 strategies were obtained from existing literature. Interviews with 4 practitioners were conducted to confirm appropriate strategies for Tanzania. 12 strategies were selected and sent to six groups of construction practitioners based in Tanzania. A total of 117 questionnaires were collected. The top three ranks of strategies include “Promote research that geared towards the application of OCT”, “Low-cost loans and financial supports in OCT implementation” and “Developing mandatory OCT policies and regulations”. The paper also indicates four clusters based on aspects of strategic management namely, “Operation”, “Market”, “Management”, and “research development and information management”. This study provides empirical evidence of the important strategies, which are valuable references to the policymakers on deciding which strategy to prioritize more for practical adoption of OCT. Future research will investigate the causal relationships among the strategies and their impacts on the OCT adoption process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arif, M., & Egbu, C. (2010). Making a case for offsite construction in China: . Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17(6), 536–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blismas, N., Wakefield, R. (2009). Drivers, constraints and the future of offsite manufacture in Australia. Construction Innovation, 9(1), 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang, L., Li, Z., Li, L., & Gao, Y. (2018). Constraints on the promotion of prefabricated construction in China. Sustainability, 10(7), 2516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Warszawski, A. (1999). Industrialized and automated building systems. A managerial approach. , London: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rahimian, F. P., Goulding, J., Akintoye, A., & Kolo, S. (2017). Review of motivations, success factors, and barriers to the adoption of offsite manufacturing in Nigeria. Procedia Engineering, 196, 512–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bari, N. A. A., Abdullah, N. A., Yusuff, R., Ismail, N., Jaapar, A. (2012). Environmental awareness and benefits of industrialized building systems (IBS). Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 392–404.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krug, D. (2013). Offsite construction: Sustainable characteristics.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yunus, R., Yang, J. (2011). Sustainability criteria for industrialised building systems (IBS) in Malaysia. Procedia Engineering, 14, 1590–1498

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jaillon, L., & Poon, C. S. (2008). Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: A Hong Kong case study. Construction Management and Economics, 26(9), 953–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu, H., Hong, J., Shen, G. Q., Mao, C., Zhang, H., & Li, Z. (2018). The exploration of the life-cycle energy saving potential for using prefabrication in residential buildings in China. Energy and Buildings, 166, 561–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu, W., Chen, K., Xue, F., & Pan, W. (2018). Searching for an optimal level of prefabrication in construction: An analytical framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mostafa, S., Chileshe, N., & Abdelhamid, T. (2016). Lean and agile integration within offsite construction using discrete event simulation. Construction Innovation, 16(4), 483–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pan, W., Gibb, A. G. F., & Dainty, A. R. J. (2007). Perspectives of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite modern methods of construction. Construction Management and Economics, 25(2), 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hong, J., Shen, G. Q., Li, Z., Zhang, B., & Zhang, W. (2018). Barriers to promoting prefabricated construction in China: A cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 649–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goulding, J. S., Pour Rahimian, F., Arif, M., & Sharp, M. D. (2014). New offsite production and business models in construction: Priorities for the future research agenda. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(3), 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alinaitwe, H. M., Mwakali, J., & Hansson, B. (2006). Assessing the degree of industrialisation in construction: A case of Uganda. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 12(3), 221–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. NBS. (2018). National Bureau of Statistics: Highlights for The Third Quarter (July-September) Gross Domestic Product 2017, Dares Salaam; January 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kikwasi, G. J. (2012). Causes and effects of delays and disruptions in construction projects in Tanzania. In N. Chileshe, M. Rofe, & R. Ameezdeen, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference and Workshop on Built Environment in Developing Countries. Fragmented Futures: the built environment in a volatile world, 138–148.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ilahuka, H. N. (2012). Harnessing technology. Dar es Salaam: CRB.

    Google Scholar 

  20. NCC. (2003). National Construction Council: Tanzania Construction Industry Policy, Dar es Salaam; November, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mao, C., Xie, F., Hou, L., Wu, P., Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2016). Cost analysis for sustainable off-site construction based on a multiple-case study in China. Habitat International, 57, 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhai, X., Reed, R., & Mills, A. (2014). Factors impeding the offsite production of housing construction in China: An investigation of current practice. Construction Management and Economics, 32(1–2), 40–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan, A. P. C., Darko, A., Ameyaw, E. E. (2017). Strategies for promoting green building technologies adoption in the construction industry—An international study. Sustainability, 9(6):969.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hansen, K. L., & Tatum, C. B. (1989). Technology and strategic management in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 5(1), 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Langford, D. A., & Male, S. (2002). Strategic management in construction: Engineering. Construction and Architectural Management, 9(4), 362–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mintzberg, H. (1987). The strategy concept I: Five Ps for strategy. California Management Review, 30(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, J. D. (2012). Strategic management and business policy: Toward global sustainability (13th ed.). London, UK: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Macmillan, H., Tampoe, M. (2001). Strategic management process, content and implementation. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy Safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Arif, F., Azhar, N., Bayraktar, M. E. (2012). Strategic management concepts and practices in Pakistan: A construction industry perspective. In American Society of Civil Engineers Construction Research Congress 2012, 1530–1539

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hwang, B.-G., Shan, M., & Looi, K.-Y. (2018). Key constraints and mitigation strategies for prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Musa, M. F., Mohammad, M. F., Yusof, M. R., Mahbub, R. (2015). The way forward for industrialised building system (IBS) in Malaysia. In R. Hassan, M. Yusoff, A. Alisibramulisi, N.M. Amin, Z. Ismail (Eds.) Proceedings of the International Civil and Infrastructure Engineering Conference 2014 (pp. 163–175). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Salama, T., Salah, A., Moselhi, O., & Al-Hussein, M. (2017). Near optimum selection of module configuration for efficient modular construction. Automation in Construction, 83, 316–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pheng, L. S., & Chuan, C. J. (2001). Just-in-time management of precast concrete components. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 127(6), 494–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Said, H. (2015). Prefabrication best practices and improvement opportunities for electrical construction. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 141(12), 4015045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu, P., Low, S. P. (2012). Lean management and low carbon emissions in precast concrete factories in Singapore. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 18(2).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kim, Y.-W., Azari, N. R., Yi, J,-S., Bae, J. (2013). Environmental impacts comparison between on-site vs. prefabricated Just-In-Time (prefab-JIT) rebar supply in construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 19(5), 647–55.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hanna, A. S., Mikhail, G., & Iskandar, K. A. (2017). State of prefab practice in the electrical construction industry: Qualitative assessment. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 143(2), 4016097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kamar, K. A. M., Alshawi, M., & Hamid, Z. A. (2009). Industrialised building system: The critical success factors. In V. Ahmed, M. Alshawi, C. Egbu, & M. Sutrisna (Eds.), The Buhu 19th International Postgraduate Research Conference (pp. 485–497). Salford, United Kingdom: In-house publication.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Arashpour, M., Wakefield, R., Abbasi, B., Arashpour, M., & Hosseini, R. (2017). Optimal process integration architectures in off-site construction: Theorizing the use of multi-skilled resources. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 14(1–2), 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Said, H. (2016). Modeling and likelihood prediction of prefabrication feasibility for electrical construction firms. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 142(2), 4015071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dainty, A. (2008). Methodological pluralism in construction management research. In A. Knight & L. Ruddock (Eds.), Advanced research methods for the built environment (pp. 1–13). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Li, Z., Shen, G. Q., & Xue, X. (2014). Critical review of the research on the management of prefabricated construction. Habitat International, 43, 240–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., He, B.-J., & Olanipekun, A. O. (2017). Examining issues influencing green building technologies adoption: The United States green building experts’ perspectives. Energy and Buildings, 144, 320–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Darko, A., & Chan, A. P. C. (2016). Critical analysis of green building research trend in construction journals. Habitat International, 57, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tam, V. W. Y., Tam, C. M., Zeng, S. X., & Ng, W. C. Y. (2007). Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction. Building and Environment, 42(10), 3642–3654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Chen, Y., Okudan, G. E., & Riley, D. R. (2010). Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings. Automation in Construction, 19(2), 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Goh, E., & Loosemore, M. (2017). The impacts of industrialization on construction subcontractors: A resource-based view. Construction Management and Economics, 35(5), 288–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Oral, E. L., Mıstıkoglu, G., & Erdis, E. (2003). JIT in developing countries: A case study of the Turkish prefabrication sector. Building and Environment, 38(6), 853–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Khalili, A., & Chua, D. K. H. (2013). IFC-based framework to move beyond individual building elements toward configuring a higher level of prefabrication. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 27(3), 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kim, M.-K., Wang, Q., Park, J.-W., Cheng, J. C. P., Sohn, H., & Chang, C.-C. (2016). Automated dimensional quality assurance of full-scale precast concrete elements using laser scanning and BIM. Automation in Construction, 72, 102–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ramaji, I. J., & Memari, A. M. (2016). Product architecture model for multistory modular buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 142(10), 4016047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Tam, V. W. Y., Fung, I. W. H., Sing, M. C. P., & Ogunlana, S. O. (2015). Best practice of prefabrication implementation in the Hong Kong public and private sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 216–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mao, C., Shen, Q., Pan, W., Ye, K. (2015) Major barriers to off-site construction: The developer’s perspective in China. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(3).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Gibbons, D. J., & Chakraborti, S. (2011). Nonparametric statistical inference. LLC, New York: Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hollander, M., Wolfe, D. A., & Chicken, E. (2014). Nonparametric statistical methods. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hutcheson, G. D., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  60. Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2011). IBM SPSS For Introductory Statistics: Use and Interpretation (4th ed.). LLC, London, UK: Taylor and Francis Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  61. Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). Australia: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rutherford, A. (2001). Introducing Anova and Ancova: A GLM approach. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wu, H., Mao, C., & Liu, G. (2015). Market expectations of government’s measures to promote off-site construction in mainland China: Developers’ perspective. In L. Y. Shen, K. Ye, & C. Mao (Eds.), 19th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (pp. 1053–1063). Berlin, German: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Gann, D. M, Salter, A. J. (2000). Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: The construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29, 955–972

    Google Scholar 

  65. Peansupap, V., Walker, D. H. T. (2006). Innovation diffusion at the implementation stage of a construction project: a case study of information communication technology. Construction Management and Economics, 24(3), 321–332

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2017M620416) and the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2016YFC0701807) Chongqing University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juma Hamisi Nzige .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nzige, J.H., Liu, G., Tibesigwa, B.M., Yinran, D. (2021). Review of Successful Strategies for Adopting Offsite Construction Technology. In: Ye, G., Yuan, H., Zuo, J. (eds) Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. CRIOCM 2019. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8892-1_133

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics