Abstract
Research on kaonic nuclear bound states is a completely new field. This nuclear system consists of an anti-K-meson (a meson having one strange quark), called a kaon, bound in a nucleus. The kaon behaves as a quasi-on-mass-shell particle and forms its own quantum state in the nuclear system. Mesons are known to behave as virtual particles in nuclei, repeatedly being created and annihilated rapidly so as to form a nuclear potential. In contrast, R.H. Dalitz suggested in the 1960s that the Λ(1405) can be a peculiar “\({\bar K}\!N\)” system, i.e., a molecule-like hadronic cluster composed of a nucleon and a \({\bar K}\) meson. However, there was no clear experimental evidence to strongly support this hypothesis until recently. In 1997, atomic kaonic hydrogen data suggested a strong attraction between kaon and proton, which is sufficient to form a nuclear bound state. This data triggered a variety of intensive search experiments to confirm the discovery. This is because the existence of a kaonic nuclear state is a natural interpretation of the Λ(1405), to be a molecule-like “\({\bar K}\!N\)” hadronic cluster. Very recently the first clear evidence for a “K − pp” bound system (composed of a K − and two protons in the charge base notation) formation was obtained. Even more interesting, a simple form(structure)-factor analysis of the experimental data on the “K − pp” signal suggested that this state may be extremely compact compared to the normal internucleon distance in nuclei, which may lead to exploring physics beyond the normal nuclear density in a quantum equilibrium. This article will discuss why and how kaonic nuclear bound states were pursued, how they were finally observed, and where such experimental research may lead us in the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
R. Aaij et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 222002 (2014)
R. Aaji et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015)
G. Agakishiev et al., Phys. Lett. B 742, 242–248 (2015)
M. Agnello et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 212303 (2005)
S. Ajimura et al., Phys. Lett. B 789, 620–625 (2019)
Y. Akaishi, T. Yamazaki, Phys. Rev. C 65, 044005 (2002)
M.G. Alford et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1455 (2008)
M. Bazzi et al., Phys. Lett. B 704, 113 (2011)
G. Beer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 212302 (2005)
G. Bendiscioli et al., Nucl. Phys. A 789, 222 (2007)
G. Bendiscioli et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 40, 11 (2009)
P.M. Bird et al., Nucl. Phys. A 404, 482 (1983)
B. Conforto et al., Nucl. Phys. B 105, 189 (1976)
S.K. Choi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003)
R.H. Dalitz, S.F. Tuan, Ann. Phys. 3, 307 (1960)
C.J.S. Damerell et al., Nucl. Phys. B 129, 397 (1977)
J.D. Davies et al., Phys. Lett. 83B, 55 (1979)
R. Del Grande et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 190 (2019)
R. Del Grande et al., Phys. Scripta 95(8), 084012 (2020)
S. Deser et al., Phys. Rev. 96, 774 (1954)
E. Epple, L. Fabbietti, Phys. Rev. C 92, 044002 (2015)
L. Fabbietti et al., Nucl. Phys. A 914, 60 (2013)
K. Fukushima, T. Hatsuda, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 014001 (2010)
A. Gal et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035004 (2016)
H. Garcilazo, A. Gal, Phys. Rev. C 81, 055205 (2010)
H. Garcilazo, A. Gal, Nucl. Phys. A 897, 167–178 (2013)
B.F. Gibson et al., Phys. Rev. C 6, (1972) 741.
J.M.M. Hall et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 132002 (2015)
T. Hashimoto et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2015, 061D01 (2015)
T. Hatsuda, T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. 247(5–6), 221 (1994)
K. Higashijima, Phys. Rev. D 29, 1228–1232 (1984)
T. Hyodo, M. Niiyama, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103868 (2021)
T. Hyodo, W. Weise, arXiv: nucl-th 2202.06181 (2022)
Y. Ichikawa, Ph.D dissertation submitted to Kyoto University (Available via SCPHYS, 2015). https://www-nh.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp/articles/thesis/dron/d-ichikawa.pdf
Y. Ichikawa et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2015, 021D01 (2015)
Y. Ichikawa et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 123D01 (2020)
D.G. Ireland et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 182301 (2019)
T.M. Ito et al., Phys. Rev. C 58, 2366–2382 (1998)
M. Iwasaki et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3067 (1997)
M. Izycki et al., Z. Phys. A 297, 11 (1980)
M. Jones et al., Nucl. Phys. B 90, 349 (1975)
P. Kienle et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 183 (2012)
T. Kishimoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4701 (1999)
T. Kishimoto et al., Prog. Theor. Phys. 118, 181 (2007)
S. Klimt et al., Nucl. Phys. A 516, 429–468 (1990)
M. Mai, Eur. Phys. J. ST 230(6), 1593–1607 (2021)
A. Martin, Nucl. Phys. B 179, 33 (1981)
K. Masuda et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2013(7), 073D01 (2013)
U.G. Meißner, Symmetry 12, 981 (2020)
K. Miyahara, T. Hyodo, Phys. Rev. C 93(1), 015201 (2016)
H. Nagahiro et al., Phys. Rev. C 87, 045201 (2013)
Y. Nambu, G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961); Y. Nambu, G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 124, 246 (1961)
Y. Nogami, Phys. Lett. 7, 288 (1963)
S. Ohnishi et al., Phys. Rev. C 95, 065202 (2017)
S. Okubo, Phys. Lett. 5, 165–168 (1963); G. Zweig, CERN Report No. 8419/TH412, preprint 8182/TH.401/412, 1964 (1963); J. Iizuka, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 37–38, 21–34 (1963)
Y. Pan et al., Phys. Rev. D 2, 449 (1970)
S. Piano et al., Nucl. Phys. A 835, 35 (2010)
J. Révai, N.V. Shevchenko, Phys. Rev. C 90, 034004 (2014)
Y. Sada et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 051D01 (2016)
F. Sakuma et al., Letter of Intent to J-PARC PAC (Available via J-PARC, 2009). http://j-parc.jp/researcher/Hadron/en/pac_0907/pdf/LOI_Sakuma.pdf
M. Sato et al., Phys. Lett. B 659, 107 (2008)
T. Sekihara et al., Nucl. Phys. A 914, 338 (2013)
N.V. Shevchenko, Nucl. Phys. A 890–891, 50–61 (2012)
N.V. Shevchenko, J. Révai, Phys. Rev. C 90(3), 034003 (2014)
T. Suzuki et al., Phys. Rev. C 76, 068202 (2007)
A.O. Tokiyasu et al., Phys. Lett. B 728, 616–621 (2014)
O. Vázquez Doce et al., Phys. Lett. B 758, 134–139 (2016)
Y. Wu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1875 (1990); Y. Wu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 242 (1991)
T. Yamaga et al., Phys. Rev. C 102, 044002 (2020)
T. Yamazaki et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 132502 (2010)
H. Yim et al., Phys. Lett. B 688, 43 (2010)
Acknowledgements
I appreciate intensive discussions that were deeply related to this paper with Dr. Takumi Yamaga. I would like to thank Dr. Tadashi Hashimoto for various suggestions and also Dr. Rie Murayama, Dr. Kenta Itahashi, and Dr. Fuminori Sakuma. I’m grateful to Dr. Benjamin F. Gibson, Dr. Hideyuki Sakai, Professor Emiko Hiyama, Professor Tetsuo Hyodo, and Professor Hiroyuki Noumi for valuable comments. Finally, I would like to thank Ms. Harumi Iwasaki for continuous support in various aspects of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Iwasaki, M. (2022). Kaonic Nuclei from the Experimental Viewpoint. In: Tanihata, I., Toki, H., Kajino, T. (eds) Handbook of Nuclear Physics . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8818-1_37-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8818-1_37-1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8818-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8818-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Physics and AstronomyReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics