Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Connected and Automated Vehicles: Opportunities and Challenges for Transportation Systems, Smart Cities, and Societies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Automating Cities

Part of the book series: Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements ((ACHS))

Abstract

Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) technology offers a potential solution to massive road transport issues in the areas of safety, mobility, and the environment. For road transport, the CAV technology promises to reduce traffic congestion, increase road capacity, enhance traffic stability, and reduce vehicle emissions. However, the path to the full implementation or a high market penetration of CAVs has some critical challenges. This chapter provides a comprehensive understanding of the opportunities associated with CAVs. These include congestion reduction, road safety improvement, environment protection, societal productivity, and economic benefits. Further, this chapter discusses five major challenges, namely: transition period, economic issues, privacy and security issues, legislative issues, and ethical issues that need to be addressed before the wide scale deployment of CAVs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Backward-looking responsibility is the responsibility that people can have for something that has occurred in the past either because of them or something they allowed to happen.

  2. 2.

    Forward-looking responsibility is the responsibility that people can have to prevent something to happen in the near or distant future.

References

  • Albright J, Bell A, Schneider J, Nyce C (2015) Automobile insurance in the era of autonomous vehicles

    Google Scholar 

  • Alessandrini A, Campagna A, Site PD, Filippi F, Persia L (2015) Automated vehicles and the rethinking of mobility and cities. Transp Res Procedia 5(2013):145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali Y, Zheng Z, Haque MdM (2018) Connectivity’s impact on mandatory lane-changing behaviour: evidences from a driving simulator study. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 93:292–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali Y, Zheng Z, Haque MdM, Wang M (2019) A game theory-based approach for modelling mandatory lane-changing behaviour in a connected environment. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 106:220–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali Y, Zheng Z, Haque MM, Yildirimoglu M, Washington S (2020) CLACD: a Complete LAne-Changing Decision model for the connected and traditional environments. Transp Res Part B Methodol. Submitted

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JM, Nidhi K, Stanley KD, Sorensen P, Samaras C, Oluwatola OA (2014) Autonomous vehicle technology: a guide for policymakers. Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auto Connected Car News (2014) Definition of connected car–what is the connected car? Defined. Auto connected car news. https://www.autoconnectedcar.com/definition-of-connected-car-what-is-the-connected-car-defined/. Accessed 20 April 2019

  • Austroads (2015) Concept of operations for C-ITS core functions. Sydney, NSW

    Google Scholar 

  • Automated and Connected Vehicles [WWW Document] (2015) Centre for advanced automative technology. https://autocaat.org/Technologies/Automated_and_Connected_Vehicles/. Accessed 13 September 2016.

  • Awad E, Dsouza S, Kim R, Schulz J, Henrich J, Shariff A, Bonnefon J-F, Rahwan I (2018) The moral machine experiment. Nature 563:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC News (2016) https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-35800285. Accessed on 5/11/2019

  • Bettisworth C, Burt M, Chachich A, Harrington R, Hassol J, Kim A, Lamoureux K, LaFrance-Linden D, Maloney C, Perlman D, Ritter G, Sloan SM, Wallischeck E (2015) Status of the dedicated short-range communications technology and applications: report to Congress

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs J (2017) Ford invests $1 billion in Pittsburgh-based Argo AI to build self-driving cars by 2021. TechCrunch. https://social.techcrunch.com/2017/02/18/ford-invests-in-pittsburgh-based-argo-ai-to-build-self-driving-cars-by-2021/. Accessed 21 November 2019

  • BITRE (2015) Traffic and congestion cost trends for Australian capital cities (Information Sheet 74). Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Economics (BITRE), Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogle A (2018) 5 big ethical questions about driverless cars we still need answered [WWW Document]. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2018-03-21/self-driving-autonomous-cars-five-ethical-questions/9567986. Accessed 28 November 2019

  • Ciuffo B, Casas J, Montanino M, Perarnau J, Punzo V (2013) Gaussian process metamodels for sensitivity analysis of traffic simulation models. Transp Res Rec 2390:87–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Ahn S, Chitturi M, Noyce DA (2017) Towards vehicle automation: roadway capacity formulation for traffic mixed with regular and automated vehicles. Transp Res Part B Methodol 100:196–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, He F, Yin Y, Du Y (2017) Optimal design of autonomous vehicle zones in transportation networks. Transp Res Part B Methodol 99:44–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childress S, Nichols B, Charlton B, Coe S (2015) Using an activity-based model to explore the potential impacts of automated vehicles. Transp Res Rec 2493:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements LM, Kockelman KM (2017) Economic effects of automated vehicles. Transp Res Rec 2606:106–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AJ, Brauer M, Burnett R, Anderson HR, Frostad J, Estep K, Balakrishnan K, Brunekreef B, Dandona L, Dandona R, Feigin V, Freedman G, Hubbell B, Jobling A, Kan H, Knibbs L, Liu Y, Martin R, Morawska L, Pope CA, Shin H, Straif K, Shaddick G, Thomas M, van Dingenen R, van Donkelaar A, Vos T, Murray CJL, Forouzanfar MH (2017) Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet 389:1907–1918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox C, Hart A (2016) How autonomous vehicles could relieve or worsen traffic congestion

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist P, Voege T (2018) Safer Roads with Automated Vehicles? (Corporate Partnership Board Report). ITF/OECD

    Google Scholar 

  • da Rocha TV, Leclercq L, Montanino M, Parzani C, Punzo V, Ciuffo B, Villegas D (2015) Does traffic-related calibration of car-following models provide accurate estimations of vehicle emissions? Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 34:267–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies A (2018) What is a self-driving car? The complete WIRED guide. Wired

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhabhar C (2018) Decided not to allow driverless cars in India: Nitin Gadkari. CarandBike An NDTV Venture

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagnant DJ, Kockelman K (2015) Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 77:167–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes P, Nunes U (2012) Platooning with IVC-enabled autonomous vehicles: strategies to mitigate communication delays, improve safety and traffic flow. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 13:91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galler B, Asher H (1995) Idea project final report, Vehicle-To-Vehicle communication for collision avoidance and improved traffic flow

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge JI, Orosz G (2014) Dynamics of connected vehicle systems with delayed acceleration feedback. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 46:46–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Assembly of the United Nations [WWW Document] (2016) https://www.un.org/en/ga/. Accessed 7 October 2016

  • Geurs KT, van Wee B (2004) Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. J Transp Geogr 12:127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiasi A, Hussain O, Qian Z (Sean), Li X (2017) A mixed traffic capacity analysis and lane management model for connected automated vehicles: A Markov chain method. Transp Res Part B Methodol 106:266–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong S, Du L (2018) Cooperative platoon control for a mixed traffic flow including human drive vehicles and connected and autonomous vehicles. Transp Res Part B Methodol 116:25–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Google Self-Driving Car Project [WWW Document] (2009) Google self-driving car project. https://www.google.com/selfdrivingcar. Accessed 10 November 2016

  • Groshen EL, Helper S, MacDuffie JP, Carson C (2019) Preparing US workers and employers for an autonomous vehicle future

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper CD, Hendrickson CT, Mangones S, Samaras C (2016) Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 72:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris M (2014) FBI warns driverless cars could be used as “lethal weapons.” The Guardian

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawes M (2015) Connected and autonomous vehicles: the UK economic opportunity. KPMG

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes B (2017) Leave the driving to it [WWW Document]. American Scientist. https://www.americanscientist.org/article/leave-the-driving-to-it. Accessed 15 November 2019

  • Hendrickson C, Biehler A, Mashayekh Y (2014) Connected and autonomous vehicles 2040 vision

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard SML (2018) Automated vehicle legislative issues. Transp Res Rec 2672:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal M, Lim S (2010) Privacy implications of automated GPS tracking and profiling. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 29(2):39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • INRIX (2015) Traffic scorecard, 2015. INRIX. https://inrix.com/scorecard/. Accessed 10 November 2016

  • Intelligent Transportation Systems-Connected Vehicle Pilot Program [WWW Document] (2015) https://www.its.dot.gov/pilots/. Accessed 10 August 2016

  • Jia D, Ngoduy D (2016) Enhanced cooperative car-following traffic model with the combination of V2V and V2I communication. Transp Res Part B Methodol 90:172–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia D, Ngoduy D, Vu HL (2019) A multiclass microscopic model for heterogeneous platoon with vehicle-to-vehicle communication. Transp B Transp Dyn 7:448–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang H, Hu J, An S, Wang M, Park BB (2017) Eco approaching at an isolated signalized intersection under partially connected and automated vehicles environment. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 79:290–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamal MAS, Taguchi S, Yoshimura T (2016) Efficient driving on multilane roads under a connected vehicle environment. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 17:2541–2551. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2519526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamalanathsharma RK, Rakha HA (2016) Leveraging connected vehicle technology and telematics to enhance vehicle fuel efficiency in the vicinity of signalized intersections. J Intell Transp Syst 20:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Rousseau G, Freedman J, Nicholson J (2015) The travel impact of autonomous vehicles in metro Atlanta through activity-based modeling. In: Presented at the 15th TRB national transportation planning applications conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim T (2015) Assessment of vehicle-to-vehicle communication based applications in an urban network (PhD). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger R, Rashidi TH, Rose JM (2016) Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 69:343–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Park B (2012) Development and evaluation of a cooperative vehicle intersection control algorithm under the connected vehicles environment. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 13:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Kockelman K, Nichols A (2017) Anticipating the emissions impacts of smoother driving by connected and autonomous vehicles, using the MOVES model. In: Presented at the transportation research board 96th annual meeting

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge C (2017) The German ethics code for automated and connected driving. Philos Technol 30:547–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manyika J, Chui M, Bughin J, Dobbs R, Bisson P, Marrs A (2013) Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. McKinsey Global Institute, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy J, Bradburn J, Williams D, Piechocki R, Hermans K (2015) Connected & autonomous vehicles. ATKINS

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J, Becker H, Bösch PM, Axhausen KW (2017) Autonomous vehicles: the next jump in accessibilities? Res Transp Econ 62:80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milakis D, van Arem B, van Wee B (2017) Policy and society related implications of automated driving: a review of literature and directions for future research. J Intell Transp Syst 21:324–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanés V, Shladover SE, Spring J, Nowakowski C, Kawazoe H, Nakamura M (2014) Cooperative adaptive cruise control in real traffic situations. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 15:296–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller C (2019) Lessons learned from hacking a car. IEEE Design Test 36(6):7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteil J, Nantes A, Billot R, Sau J, El Faouzi N (2014) Microscopic cooperative traffic flow: calibration and simulation based on a next generation simulation dataset. IET Intel Transp Syst 8:519–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naus GJL, Vugts RPA, Ploeg J, van de Molengraft MJG, Steinbuch M (2010) String-stable CACC design and experimental validation: a frequency-domain approach. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 59:4268–4279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngoduy D (2013) Instability of cooperative adaptive cruise control traffic flow: A macroscopic approach. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 18:2838–2851

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • NHTSA (2015) Critical reasons for crashes investigated in the national motor vehicle crash causation survey. U.S. National Highway Safety Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyholm S, Smids J (2016) The ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars: an applied trolley problem? Ethic Theory Moral Prac 19:1275–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivier JGJ, Janssens-Maenhout G, Muntean M, Peters JAHW (2013) Trends in global CO2 emissions. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadoulis A, Quddus M, Imprialou M (2019) Evaluating the safety impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on motorways. Accid Anal Prev 124:12–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploeg J, Scheepers BTM, van Nunen E, van de Wouw N, Nijmeijer H (2011) Design and experimental evaluation of cooperative adaptive cruise control. In: 2011 14th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC). Presented at the 2011 14th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), pp 260–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Punzo V, Montanino M (2016) Speed or spacing? Cumulative variables, and convolution of model errors and time in traffic flow models validation and calibration. Transp Res Part B Methodol 91:21–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi Y, Chen X, Yang L, Wang B, Yu L (2009) Vehicle infrastructure integration (VII) based road-condition warning system for highway collision prevention

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin Y, Wang H, Ran B (2018) Stability analysis of connected and automated vehicles to reduce fuel consumption and emissions. J Transp Eng Part A Syst 144:04018068

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajamani R, Shladover SE (2001) An experimental comparative study of autonomous and co-operative vehicle-follower control systems. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 9:15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rios-Torres J, Malikopoulos AA (2018) Impact of partial penetrations of connected and automated vehicles on fuel consumption and traffic flow. IEEE Trans Intell Veh 3:453–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rios-Torres J, Malikopoulos AA (2017) Automated and cooperative vehicle merging at highway on-ramps. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 18:780–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAE (2016) NHTSA adopts SAE international standard defining autonomous vehicles [WWW Document]. https://www.sbdautomotive.com/en/nhtsa-sae-international-standard. Accessed 9 October 2016

  • Schoettle B (2017) Sensor fusion: a comparison of sensing capabilities of human drivers and highly automated vehicles. University of Michigan, Sustainable Worldwide Transportation, Technical Report SWT-2017-12

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Zheng Z, Bhaskar A, Haque MdM (2019a) Modelling car-following behaviour of connected vehicles with a focus on driver compliance. Transp Res Part B Methodol 126:256–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Zheng Z, Kim J, Bhaskar A, Haque MM (2019b) Assessing the efficiency and safety of the mixed traffic flow of Connected Vehicles and Traditional Vehicles. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A, Zheng Z, Bhaskar A (2019c) Is more always better? The impact of vehicular trajectory completeness on car-following model calibration and validation. Transp Res Part B Methodol 120:49–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Zheng Z, Kim J, Bhaskar A, Haque M (2020) Is an informed driver a better decision maker? A grouped random parameters with heterogeneity-in-means approach to investigate the impact of the connected environment on driving behaviour in safety-critical situations. Anal Methods Accid Res 100127

    Google Scholar 

  • Shladover SE, Su D, Lu X-Y (2012) Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow. Transp Res Rec 2324:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith B (2015 ) Automated and Autonomous driving: regulation under uncertainity. International Transport Forum

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Zheng Z, Sun J (2018) Stability analysis methods and their applicability to car-following models in conventional and connected environments. Transp Res Part B Methodol 109:212–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Zheng Z, Sun J (2020) The relationship between car following string instability and traffic oscillations in finite-sized platoons and its use in easing congestion via connected and automated vehicles with IDM based controller. Transp Res Part B Methodol. Accepted

    Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Development Goals [WWW Document] (2016) UNDP. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html. Accessed 7 October 2016

  • Thakur P, Kinghorn R, Grace R (2016) Urban form and function in the autonomous era. In: Presented at the Australasian transport research forum (ATRF), 38th, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • The Climate Council of Australia (2018) The climate council annual report. The Climate Council of Australia Limited

    Google Scholar 

  • The New York Times (2016) https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/13/business/tesla-autopilot-fatal-crash-investigation.html?_r=0. Accessed on 5/11/2019

  • Thomson JJ (1985) The trolley problem. Yale Law J 94:1395–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency Market Reserach (2013) Connected car market-global industry analysis, size, share, growth, trends and forecast 2013–2019 [WWW Document]. https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/connected-car.html. Accessed 1 May 19

  • Tu R, Alfaseeh L, Djavadian S, Farooq B, Hatzopoulou M (2019) Quantifying the impacts of dynamic control in connected and automated vehicles on greenhouse gas emissions and urban NO2 concentrations. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 73:142–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESC (2009) Major issues in transport: transport and environment. United Nations Economic and Social Council (UNESC)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahidi A, Sciarretta A (2018) Energy saving potentials of connected and automated vehicles. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 95

    Google Scholar 

  • van Arem B, van Driel CJG, Visser R (2006) The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 7:429–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Daamen W, Hoogendoorn SP, van Arem B (2016) Cooperative car-following control: distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 17:1459–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeratunga K, Somers A (2015) Connected vehicles: are we ready? Internal report on potential implications for Main Roads WA

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead JE (2015) The expected and unexpected consequences of implementing energy efficient vehicle incentives (PhD). Queensland University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2018) Global status report on road safety. World Health Organisation (WHO)

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2012) WHO global urban ambient air pollution database. World Health Organisation (WHO)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright J, Garrett JK, Hill CJ, Krueger GD, Evans JH, Andrews S, Wilson CK, Rajbhandari R, Burkhard B (2014) National connected vehicle field infrastructure footprint analysis

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y, Zhang H, Gartner NH, Arsava T (2017) Collaborative merging strategy for freeway ramp operations in a connected and autonomous vehicles environment. J Intell Transp Syst 21:136–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Jin W-L (2014) A control theoretic formulation ofgreen driving strategies based on inter-vehicle communications. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 41:48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye L, Yamamoto T (2019) Evaluating the impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic safety. Physica A Stat Mech Appl 526:121009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye L, Yamamoto T (2018a) Modeling connected and autonomous vehicles in heterogeneous traffic flow. Physica A Stat Mech Appl 490:269–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye L, Yamamoto T (2018b) Impact of dedicated lanes for connected and autonomous vehicle on traffic flow throughput. Physica A Stat Mech Appl 512:588–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye L, Yamamoto T (2018c) Modeling connected and autonomous vehicles in heterogeneous traffic flow. Physica A Stat Mech Appl 490:269–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Malikopoulos A, Rios-Torres J (2018) Optimal control of connected and automated vehicles at roundabouts: an investigation in a mixed-traffic environment. In: 15th IFAC symposium on control in transportation systems CTS 2018, vol 51, pp 73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Kockelman KM (2018) Anticipating the regional impacts of connected and automated vehicle travel in Austin, Texas. J of Urban Plan Dev 144:04018032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou M, Qu X, Jin S (2017) On the impact of cooperative autonomous vehicles in improving freeway merging: a modified intelligent driver model-based approach. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 18:1422–1428

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohdy IH, Rakha HA (2016) Intersection management via vehicle connectivity: the intersection cooperative adaptive cruise control system concept. J Intell Transp Syst 20:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by the Australian Research Council (ARC) through Dr Zuduo Zheng’s Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA; DE160100449).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia

    Anshuman Sharma & Zuduo Zheng

Authors
  1. Anshuman Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zuduo Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zuduo Zheng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Brydon T. Wang

  2. School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia

    C. M. Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sharma, A., Zheng, Z. (2021). Connected and Automated Vehicles: Opportunities and Challenges for Transportation Systems, Smart Cities, and Societies. In: Wang, B.T., Wang, C.M. (eds) Automating Cities. Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8670-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation