Skip to main content

Multi-objective Optimization of the Reinforced Concrete Beam

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Harmony Search, Soft Computing and Applications (ICHSA 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1275))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper introduces two kinds of multi-objective optimization algorithms. The optimal values are determined through multi-objective functions and various equality and inequality constraints. The optimal value results of the two algorithms with different parameters are discussed. A simplified optimization case of reinforced concrete beam was discussed that minimizes the total cost of reinforced concrete beams while complying with all strength and serviceability requirements for a given level of the applied load. This paper focuses on the differences between Multi-objective Harmony Search Algorithm (MOHSA) and Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) for reinforced concrete beam design subjected to a specified set of constraints by considering aspects of the Harmony Memory Considering Rate (HMCR) parameters in HSA and Population Mutation (Pm) parameters in GA. Through HSA and GA for RC beam problem, with same reference strength, the result using GA has a lower cost than using HSA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. V. Govindaraj, J.V. Ramasamy, Optimum detailed design of reinforced concrete continuous beams using genetic algorithms. Comput. Struct. 84(1–2), 34–48 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Sivasubramani, K.S. Swarup, Multi-objective harmony search algorithm for optimal power flow problem. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 33(3), 745–752 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Z.W. Geem, J.H. Kim, G.V. Loganathan, A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 76(2), 60–68 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Chakraborty, et al., An improved harmony search algorithm with differential mutation operator. Fundamenta Informaticae 95(4), 401–426 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Vasebi, M. Fesanghary, S.M.T. Bathaee, Combined heat and power economic dispatch by harmony search algorithm. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 29(10), 713–719 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C.A. Coello, A.D. Christiansen, F. Santos Hernandez, A simple genetic algorithm for the design of reinforced concrete beams. Eng. Comput. 13(4), 185–196 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.A. Vignaux, Z. Michalewicz, A genetic algorithm for the linear transportation problem. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B Cybern. 21(2), 445–452 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. H.M. Amir, T. Hasegawa, Nonlinear mixed-discrete structural optimization. J. Struct. Eng. 115(3), 626–646 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Koziel, X.-S. Yang (eds.) Computational Optimization, Methods and Algorithms, vol. 356 s(Springer, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. ACI Committee, Commentary on building code requirements for reinforced concrete (ACI 318–77). American Concrete Institute (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Saini, V.K. Sehgal, M.L. Gambhir, Genetically optimized artificial neural network based optimum design of singly and doubly reinforced concrete beams (2006), pp. 603–619

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Kaveh, R.A. Izadifard, L. Mottaghi, Optimal design of planar RC frames considering CO2 emissions using ECBO, EVPS and PSO metaheuristic algorithms. J. Build. Eng. 28, 101014 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Kaveh, R.A. Izadifard, L. Mottaghi, COST optimization of RC frames using automated member grouping. Iran Univ. Sci. Technol. 10(1), 91–100 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Verma, B.K. Panigrahi, P.R. Bijwe, Harmony search algorithm for transmission network expansion planning. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 4(6), 663–673 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Kaveh, O. Sabzi, A comparative study of two meta-heuristic algorithms for optimum design of reinforced concrete frames (2011), pp. 193–206

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Kaveh, T. Bakhshpoori, S.M. Hamze-Ziabari, GMDH-based prediction of shear strength of FRP-RC beams with and without stirrups. Comput. Concr. 22(2), 197–207 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Young-Kyu Ju or Joong Hoon Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, ZY., Gifari, Z., Ju, YK., Kim, J.H. (2021). Multi-objective Optimization of the Reinforced Concrete Beam. In: Nigdeli, S.M., Kim, J.H., BekdaÅŸ, G., Yadav, A. (eds) Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Harmony Search, Soft Computing and Applications. ICHSA 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1275. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8603-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics