Abstract
In the millions of years of evolution, nature has developed very efficient systems that move all elements and substances in cycles so that there is no waste. Humans, on the other hand, have recently developed industrial systems in the last few centuries that have a linear flow, extracting resources from nature and discarding them as waste after a brief period of use. Solutions to handle pollution have moved from end-of-pipe treatment to cleaner production and now towards a circular economy. A circular economy tries to move away from this linear model in trying to extend the life of products and services while minimizing burdens to the environment. To ensure that there are actually environmental benefits, a life cycle thinking approach is essential. This philosophy is developed in the chapter and life cycle assessment is introduced as an essential tool for environmental evaluation. Case studies on sugarcane biorefinery and packaging materials are provided to illustrate the utility of life cycle assessment in ensuring environmental benefits when approaching circularity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
EC. (2015). A European strategy for plastics in a circular economy (pp. 1–22). European Commission.
Gujba, H., & Azapagic, A. (2011). Carbon footprint of beverage packaging in the United Kingdom. In M. Finkbeiner (Ed.), Towards life cycle sustainability management (pp. 381–389). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1899-9_37.
Gaines, L. L., & Mintz, M. M. (1994). Energy implications of glass-container recycling. Argonne National Laboratory.
ICF. (2006). Documentation for greenhouse gas emission and energy factors used in the Waste Reduction Model (WARM): Containers, packaging, and non-durable good materials chapters. ICF International, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
ISO. (2006a). ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization.
ISO. (2006b). ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization.
ISO. (2015). ISO 14001:2015 Environmental management systems—Requirements with guidance for use. International Organization for Standardization.
RIVM. (2017). ReCiPe 2016 v1.1 A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level, Report I: Characterization, RIVM Report 2016-0104a. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.
Silalertruksa, T., Pongpat, P., & Gheewala, S. H. (2017). Life cycle assessment for enhancing environmental sustainability of sugarcane biorefinery in Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140(Part 2), 906–913.
TGO. (2020). GHG Emission Factors for Carbon Footprint of Product (CFP), Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (Public Organization). See also https://thaicarbonlabel.tgo.or.th/products_emission/products_emission.pnc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gheewala, S.H., Silalertruksa, T. (2021). Life Cycle Thinking in a Circular Economy. In: Liu, L., Ramakrishna, S. (eds) An Introduction to Circular Economy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8510-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8510-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8509-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8510-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)