Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of Wireless Technologies Coexistence Mechanisms in IoT: A Survey

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICT Analysis and Applications

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 154))

Abstract

The new communication model, Internet of Things (IoT) leads in the deployment of multiple and heterogeneous technologies in same frequency bands: the unlicensed bands. With the increase of connected devices, this cohabitation generates a lot of interferences which are the main source of performances degradation in wireless networks. In literature, coexistence of heterogeneous networks has been studied in many situations, especially in the WPAN (Wireless Personal Area Network) and WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network) colocation on 2.4 GHz band and in the spectrum sharing between Wi-fi and LTE (Long Term Evolution) on 5 GHz bands and not enough in IoT framework. The goal of this paper is to review wireless networks coexistence techniques developed on the MAC layer, then make a coexistence methods classification, bring a comparative analysis of these methods performances and finally study their adaptability in IoT context, regarding the applications, topologies, density and traffic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fadeyi, J., Markus, E. D., Abu-Mahfouz, A. M. (2019). Technology coexistence in LPWANs-A comparative analysis for spectrum optimization. In 2019 IEEE 28th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Vancouver (pp. 2244–2249).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hattab, G., & Cabric, D. (2018, October). Spectrum sharing protocols based on ultra-narrowband communications for unlicensed massive IoT. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN), Seoul (pp. 1–10).

    Google Scholar 

  3. ieee-recommended-practice-for-information-technology-local-and-m.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Masoudi, M., Azari, A., Yavuz, E. A., Cavdar, C. (2018, mai). Grant-free radio access IoT networks: Scalability analysis in coexistence scenarios. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Kansas City, MO (pp. 1–7).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sagari, S., Seskar, I., & Raychaudhuri, D. (2015). Modeling the coexistence of LTE and WiFi heterogeneous networks in dense deployment scenarios. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW), London (pp. 2301–2306).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ancans, A., et al. (2019). Bluetooth low energy throughput in densely deployed radio environment. In 2019 23rd International Conference Electronics, Palanga (pp. 1–5).

    Google Scholar 

  7. La, Q. D., Nguyen-Nam, D., Ngo, M. V., Hoang, H. T., & Quek, T. Q. S. (2018, December). Dense deployment of BLE-based body area networks: A coexistence study. IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, 2(4), 972–981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mourad, A., Muhammad, S., Al Kalaa, M. O., Hoeher, P. A., & Refai, H. (2017). Bluetooth and IEEE 802.11n system coexistence in the automotive domain. In 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), San Francisco (pp. 1–6).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, C. K., Yang, C. S., & Kang, C. G. (2016). Adaptive Listen-Before-Talk (LBT) scheme for LTE and Wi-Fi systems coexisting in unlicensed band. In 2016 13th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), Las Vegas (pp. 589–594).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, Y., Lee, S., & Lee, S. (2015) Coexistence of ZigBee-based WBAN and WiFi for health telemonitoring systems. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 20(1), 222–230.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ben Hafaiedh, H., El Korbi, I., Saidane, L. A., & Kobbane, A. (2017). LTE-U and WiFi coexistence in the 5 GHz unlicensed spectrum: A survey. In 2017 International Conference on Performance Evaluation and Modeling in Wired and Wireless Networks (PEMWN), Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maglogiannis, V., Naudts, D., Shahid, A., Giannoulis, S., Laermans, E., & Moerman, I. (2017, août). Cooperation techniques between LTE in unlicensed spectrum and Wi-Fi towards fair spectral efficiency. Sensors, 17(9), 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kalaa, M. O. A., Guag, J., & Seidman, S. J. (2018). An outlook on wireless coexistence with focus on medical devices. IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Magazine, 7(3), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/memc.2018.8479340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reynders, B., Meert, W., & Pollin, S. (2016, mai). Range and coexistence analysis of long range unlicensed communication. In 2016 23rd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT), Thessaloniki, Greece (pp. 1–6).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chew, K.-M., & Kelly, C. (2018, juin). RF co-existence testing for IoT wireless medical devices. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), Rome (pp. 1–6).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Seidman, S., & LaSorte, N. (2014). An experimental method for evaluating wireless coexistence of a Bluetooth medical device. IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Magazine, 3(3), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/memc.2014.6924328.

  17. ieee-standard-for-information-technology–telecommunications-and.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gandarillas, C., Martin-Engenos, C., Pombo, H. L., & Marques, A. G. (2014). Dynamic transmit-power control for WiFi access points based on wireless link occupancy. In 2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Istanbul (pp. 1093–1098).

    Google Scholar 

  19. LTE Release 13.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Díaz, M., Martín, C., & Rubio, B. (2016, mai). State-of-the-art, challenges, and open issues in the integration of Internet of things and cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 67, 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.01.010.

  21. Ferré, G., & Simon, E. (2018). An introduction to Sigfox and LoRa PHY and MAC layers, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ishida, S., Tagashira, S., & Fukuda, A. (2015, déc.). AP-assisted CTS-blocking for WiFi-ZigBee coexistence. In 2015 Third International Symposium on Computing and Networking (CANDAR), Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan (pp. 110–114).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Guan, Z., & Melodia, T. (2016). CU-LTE: Spectrally-efficient and fair coexistence between LTE and Wi-Fi in unlicensed bands. In IEEE INFOCOM 2016—The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, San Francisco (pp. 1–9).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Khan, I., & Harri, J. (2017, juin). Can IEEE 802.11p and Wi-Fi coexist in the 5.9 GHz ITS band ? In 2017 IEEE 18th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), Macau, China (pp. 1–6).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cheng, N., Zhang, N., Lu, N., Shen, X., Mark, J. W., & Liu, F. (2014, janv.) Opportunistic spectrum access for CR-VANETs: A game-theoretic approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 63(1), 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Perez-Romero, J., Sallent, O., Ahmadi, H., & Macaluso, I. (2016, avr.). On modeling channel selection in LTE-U as a repeated game. In 2016 IEEE WCNC, Doha, Qatar (pp. 1–6).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sohn, I., & Lee, S. H. (2015, October). Distributed scheduling for coexistence of IoT wireless devices. In 2015, International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), Jeju Island, South Korea (pp. 680–682).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yu, H., Iosifidis, G., Huang, J., & Tassiulas, L. (2016). Auction-based coopetition between LTE unlicensed and Wi-Fi.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hamidouche, K., Saad, W., & Debbah, M. (2016). A multi-game framework for harmonized LTE-U and WiFi coexistence over unlicensed bands.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Do-Yun, K., & Choi, Y.-J. (2015). Spectrum coordination of multi-RAT D2D for IoT service. In 2015 ICTC, Jeju Island.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marius Dasylva Mendy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mendy, M.D., Faye, Y. (2021). A Comparative Study of Wireless Technologies Coexistence Mechanisms in IoT: A Survey. In: Fong, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) ICT Analysis and Applications. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 154. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8354-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8354-4_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8353-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8354-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics