Skip to main content

Performance Analysis of Flat-Plate Solar Collector Using Tungsten Trioxide Nanofluid

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Materials Research (ICAMR 2019)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Materials ((SPM,volume 5))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1029 Accesses

Abstract

An experimental study was performed to investigate the performance of flat-plate solar collector using water and WO3 nanofluid as working fluids. Analysis and comparison were carried out for energy efficiency, entropy generation, exergy destruction, and exergy efficiency. WO3 nanofluid exhibited 13.49% higher efficiency when compared to water on operation with flat-plate solar collector. The entropy generation was minimum for 0.0667 vol.% WO3 nanofluid and maximum for water. The flat-plate collector exhibited improved exergy efficiency 24.63, 34.83, and 57.39% for 0.0167 vol.% WO3, 0.0334 vol.% WO3, and 0.0667 vol.% WO3 nanofluid on comparison with water. The solar collector indicates the highest exergy efficiency for 0.0667 vol.% WO3 nanofluid. On experimentation, solar flat collector exhibited the use of WO3 nanofluid could improve the thermal efficiency, and maximum performance was attained for the use of 0.0667 vol.% WO3 nanofluid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bellos E, Tzivanidis C (2017) Parametric investigation of nanofluids utilization in parabolic trough collectors. Therm Sci Eng Prog 2:71e79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2017.05.001

  2. Kolagirau S (2004) Solar thermal collectors and applications. Prog Energy Combust Sci 231–95

    Google Scholar 

  3. Choi DASS, Wang HP (1995) Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles in development and applications of non-newtonian flows. ASME, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eastman JA, Choi SUS, Li S, Yu W, Thompson LJ (2001) Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 78:718e720. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1341218

  5. Yousefi T, Veysi F, Shojaeizadeh E, Zinadini S (2012) An experimental investigation on the effect of Al2O3-H2O nanofluid on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors. Renew Energy 39:293–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zamzamian A, KeyanpourRad M, KianiNeyestani M, Jamal-Abad MT (2014) An experimental study on the effect of Cu-synthesized/EG nanofluid on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors. Renew Energy 71:658–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sujit Kumar Verma (2016) Arun Kumar Tiwari, Durg Singh Chauhan, Performance augmentation in flat plate solar collector using MgO/water nanofluid. Energy Convers Manage 124:607–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharafeldin MA, Gróf G, Mahian O (2017) Experimental study on the performance of a flat-plate collector using WO3/water nanofluids. Energy 141:2436–2444

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shojaeizadeh FV, Kamandi A (2015) Exergy efficiency investigation and optimization of an Al2O3-water nanofluid based flat-plate solar collector. Energy and Buildings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tonga Y, Lee H, Kangc W, Cho H (2019) Energy and exergy comparison of a flat-plate solar collector using water, Al2O3 nanofluid, and CuO nanofluid. Appl Therm Eng 159:113959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sundar LS, Sharma KV (2008) Thermal conductivity enhancement of nanoparticles in distilled water. Int J Nanopart 1:66–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pak BC, Cho YI (1998) Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. J Therm Energy Gener Transp Storage Convers 11:151–170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jafarkazemi F, Ahmadifard E (2013) Energetic and exegetic evaluation of flat plate solar collectors. Renew Energy 56:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bejan AE (1988) Thermodynamics. Wiley Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bejan (1995) Entropy generation minimization, the method of thermodynamic optimization of finite-size systems and finite-time processes. CRC Press, Boca Ratonm

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Vinoth Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vinoth Kumar, J., Amarkarthik, A., Harish, R., Mugundan, S., Suriyaa, R.R. (2021). Performance Analysis of Flat-Plate Solar Collector Using Tungsten Trioxide Nanofluid. In: Kumaresan, G., Shanmugam, N.S., Dhinakaran, V. (eds) Advances in Materials Research. ICAMR 2019. Springer Proceedings in Materials, vol 5. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8319-3_83

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics