Skip to main content

Toward Understanding the Nature of Inequality in India in Terms of Changing Perceptions on Its Sources and Solutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Development Challenges of India After Twenty Five Years of Economic Reforms

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

  • 247 Accesses

Abstract

This paper enquires about changing perceptions of inequality in terms of its sources, consequences, and the solutions that have been thrown up by the emerging research findings on the issue. The conception of inequality is a dynamic one and has seen many transitions. This paper surveys this transition starting from Aristotle to Piketty and shows that the shift to multidimensionality of inequality, besides locating the issue in historical context in terms of social, political, and economic dimensions also calls for differentiation of types of inequality. The conventional wisdom that inequality is the result of the differences in skills and talents is questioned and other sources of inequality, mainly policies and politics, are brought into debate. The relationship of inequality with growth, poverty, and labor market outcomes is analyzed and it is shown that inequality is a constraint on growth and poverty reduction. If one were to simplify the problem of inequality into two dimensions, viz., inequality of opportunities and inequality of outcomes, perhaps there is no other country in the world other than India which faces the inequality of opportunities as deep, because of its centuries of history, and as wide because of its universal nature across all regions of the country. India is one of the very few countries which do not collect information on income through household surveys. This paper uses many alternative data sources for India and shows that there is a clear phenomenon of ‘hollowing out’ of the middle class. Fiscal policy, especially taxation, has an important role in reducing inequality. But, reliance on fiscal policy only may not be sufficient and there is a need for radical policy and political mobilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The reference “today” should be seen as 1960s and early 1970s around which it was written and at which point the Pareto dictum that inequality changes but “stable in the long run” was still dominant mainstream conception.

  2. 2.

    Part of this paragraph draws from Haque (2019).

  3. 3.

    IHDS has been jointly organized by researchers from the University of Maryland and the National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER), New Delhi.

  4. 4.

    In India, income tax was introduced in 1922.

References

  • ADB. (2012). Asian Development Outlook: Confronting Rising Inequality in Asia. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvaredo, Facundo., Lucas Chancel, Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman (2018), World Inequality Report, World Inequality Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvaredo, Facundo., Anthony B. Attkinson, Thomas Piketty, and Emmanuel Saez (2013) “The Top 1 percent in International and Historical Perspective”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 27, No. 3, Summer 2013, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, I and A. Thampi (2016) “Recent Trends in Wealth Inequality in India” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K., Bowles, Samuel, & Durlaf, Steven. (2000). Introduction. Meritocracy and Economic Inequality: Princeton University Press, Princeton, IX–XV.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, B. A. (2015). Inequality: What is to be done?. London: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Dean (2014) “Economic Policy in a Post-Piketty World”. Truthout, April 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa, Alexandre, de Fuilas., Maria Cristina Cacciamali, et al. (2016). Growth, Labour and Inequality in Brazil and India: A Comparative Study. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, Andrew G., & Ostry, Jonathan D. (2011). Inequality and Understanding Unstable Growth: The Sides of the same coin? (p. 8). International Monetary Fund, Washington, April: IMF Staff Discussion Note.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, Jamine (Ed.). (2015). Labour Markets, Institutions and Inequality: Building Just Societies in the 21st Century. Geneva: Intenational Labour Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billinger, Paul, Jr, B., & Moises ARce, (2011). Protest and Democracy in Latin America’s Market Era. Political Research Quarterly, 64(3), 688–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chancel, Lucas. And Thomas Piketty (2017) “Indian Income Inequality, 1922–2014: From British Raj to Billionnaire Raj?” WID. World Working Paper Series N2017/11, Wealth and Income Database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corak, Miles (2013) “Income Inequality, Equality of Opportunity, and Intergenerational Mobility”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 27, No. 3, Summer 2013, 79–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A. (2017). “Politicising Inequalities: The Power of Ideas”, Working Paper, Kings College, London, June 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, Aditi, & Walton, Michael. (2012). Where do India’s Billionaires Get their Wealth? Economic and Political Weekly, XLVII, 40, 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque, T. and D.N. Reddy Eds. (2019) India Social Development Report 2018: Rising Inequalities in India, Council for Social Development, and Oxford University Press, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRICT (2019) A Roadmap to improve Rules for Taxing Multinationals, Independent Commission for the Reform of International Corporate Taxation.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. (2017). Global Wage Report 2016-17: Wage Inequality in the Workplace. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2007). World Economic Outlook: Globalisation and Inequality. Washington, October: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2017a). Tracking Inequality. International Monetary Fund, Washington DC, October: Fiscal Monitor.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2017b). IMF Fiscal Monitor: Tackling Inequality, October 2017. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D. (2015) “Extreme wealth is not merited”, Oxfam Discussion Papers, www.oxfam.org, November.

  • Jaumotte, Florence, & Buitron, Carolina Osorio. (2015). Inequality and Labor Market Institutions. International Monetary Fund, Washington: IMF Staff Discussion Note.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraj, D., & Subramaniam, S. (2018). The Distribution of Household Assets in India: 1991–1992 to 2012–2013. Indian Journal of Human Development, 12(2), 181–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Gareth A. (2017) “The Geographies of Capital in the Twenty-First Century: Inequality, Political Economy, and Space”, in Heather Boushey, et.al. edited, After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 280–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, Simon. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagarde, Christina (2019) “An Overhaul of the International Tax System can wait no longer” The Financial Times, March 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanker, C., Daniel Gersyon Mawer, Maria Negre and Espen Beer Prydy (2019) “How Much Does Reducing Inequality Matter for Global Poverty?” Policy Research Working Paper, 8869, World Bank Group, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Sangheon. And Megan Gerecke (2012) “Inequality and Economic Growth Revisiting Kuznetsian Political Economy of Inequality”, Keynote Paper on the theme “Wages and Wage Share” at the 54th Annual Conference of the Indian Society of Labour Economics, Varanasi, 20–22 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustig, Nora (2015) “The Redistributive Impact of Government Spending on Education and Health: Evidence from Thirteen Developing Countries in the Commitment to Equity Project”, Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper No. 30, Tulana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustig, N., L. F. Lpez-Calva, E. Ortiz-Juarez (2015) “Deconstructing the Decline in Inequality in Latin America”, in Basu, Kaushik and Joseph Stiglitz, (eds) Proceedings of IEA Round Table on Shared Prosperity and Growth, Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahendra Dev, S (2017) “Inequality, Employment and Public Policy”, Presidential Address, 59th Annual Conference, The Indian Society of Labour Economics, Thiruvananthapuram, 16–18 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maia, Alexandre Gori & Esther Menezes (2014) “Economic Growth, Labour and Productivity in Brazil and the United States: A Comparative Analysis” Revista de Economia Politica, (Review of Economics and Politics), Vol. 34, No. 2, Sao Paulo, April/June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge., Violata Vulovic and Blanca Moreno Dodson (2012) “The Impact of Tax and Expenditure Policies on Income Distribution: Evidence from Large Panel of Countries”, (Hacienda Publica Espaniola) Review of Public Economics, 200(2012), 95–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. (2016) “The Question of India’s Inequality”, http://glineq.blogspot.in/2016/05/the-question-of-india’s-inequality.html.

  • Milanovic, B. (2017) “Increasing Capital Income Share and Its Effects on Personal Income Inequality”, in Heather Boushey et.al. edited After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 235–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo, J. (2019). “Arresting Tax Avoidance by MNCs” The Hindu Business Line, November 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam (2017) “Great Expectations: Is the IMF turning words into action on inequality?”, Oxfam Briefing Paper, www.Oxfam.org.

  • Oxfam (2018) Reward Work, Not Wealth, www.Oxfam.org.

  • Piketty, T (2014) Capital in Twenty First Century, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2017) “Toward a Reconciliation between Economics and Social Sciences” in Boushey, H. et.al. ed. op.cit., pp. 543–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R. G. (2010). Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, D. Narasimha (2019) “Persistent Inequalities in India: Challenges in Overcoming Inequalities of Opportunities” in Haque and Reddy eds., Op.Cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. M. (2012). The Politics of Inequality and Redistribution in Latin America’s Post-Adjustment Era”, United Nations University and World Institute for Development Economics Research, Working Paper No. 2012/08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saez, E. (2017). Research Agenda after Capital in Twenty-First Century. in Heather Bourshey et.al. edited After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass, 304–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1973). On Economic Inequality. Oxford: Clarenden Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaxson, N. (2019). “The billions attracted by tax havens do harm to sending and receiving nations alike”, Finance and Development, September 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shetty, S. L. (2018).“Neglect of Growing Income and Asset Inequalities: A Flaw in Public Policy Discourses in India”, Indian Journal of Human Development, (12(2), 149–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph, & E., (2015). The Origins of Inequality, and Policies to Contain It. National Tax Journal, 68(2), 425–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2014). Our Crony-Capitalism Index: Planet Plutocrat: The Countries where Politically connected businessmen are most likely to prosper. The Economist, March 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2017). Briefing Taxing Inheritances, The Economist, 25th November 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van, T. K., & Simun, S. (2012). Income Inequality as a cause for the Great Recession? A Survey of Current Debates, Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 39, International Labour Office, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2011). Evolution of Income Inequality: Different Time Perspectives and Dimensions. Trade and Development Report, UNCTAD: Chapter III.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2013). Humanity Divided: Confronting Inequality in Developing Countries. New York, November: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakulabharanam, V. (2010). Does Class Matter? Class Structure and Worsening Inequality in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(29), 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, K. (2003). Inequality and the Case for Redistribution: Aristotle to Sen. In: Paper at History of Economics Society Annual meeting, June 4–7, 2003, Duke University, http://history-of-economics.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2003/pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Narasimha Reddy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Narasimha Reddy, D. (2020). Toward Understanding the Nature of Inequality in India in Terms of Changing Perceptions on Its Sources and Solutions. In: Mishra, N.K. (eds) Development Challenges of India After Twenty Five Years of Economic Reforms. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8265-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics