Abstract
Teacher communication behaviors have enormous impacts on students’ learning processes and thus have attracted extensive scholarly attention (Mazer, 2013). Teacher confirmation is the process through which teachers communicate to students that they are endorsed, recognized, and acknowledged as valuable individuals (Ellis, 2000). In primarily US-based research, teacher confirmation has been linked to a variety of effective pedagogical practices, student motivation, and emotional outcomes (Ellis, 2004). As McCroskey and McCroskey (2006) stated, it is not likely that instructional practices in other instructional cultures are always as effective as they are in the United States. To understand the classroom dynamics in a global setting, instructional communication researchers increasingly have examined the extent to which teaching practices enacted in the United States can be applied to other countries. Goldman, Bolkan, and Goodboy (2014) observed that teacher confirmation has a greater effect on students learning in the United States than in China or Turkey. Goodboy, Bolkan, Beebe, and Schultz (2010), investigating the cross-cultural behavioral alteration techniques and affinity-seeking strategies with instructors, reported that while Chinese students use more behavioral alteration techniques, American students use more diverse varieties of affinity-seeking. These classroom differences were mainly attributed to the national cultural differences such as individualism vs. collectivism and power distance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This shows the measure (scale) functions similarly in different contexts. If a scale does not perform similarly in different contexts or groups, it is not a reliable measure of a construct.
- 2.
This means previous studies have used the same scale, and they also found and report it to be extremely reliable.
- 3.
This means the result is significantly strong enough to not have occurred by accident.
- 4.
This means the correlations between teacher confirmation and student motivation in the United States are different from the same correlations in Finland.
References
Andersen, P. A., & Guerrero, L. K. (1998). Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, and constructs. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Anderson, J. F., & Powell, R. (1991). Intercultural communication and the classroom. In L. A. Samovar & R. W. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (6th ed., pp. 208–214). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Beatty, M. J., Forst, E. C., & Stewart, R. A. (1986). Communication apprehension and motivation as predictors of public speaking duration. Communication Education, 35, 143–146.
Behrends, R. S., & Blatt, S. J. (1985). Internalization and psychological development throughout the life cycle. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 40, 11–39.
Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Boston: McGraw Hill.
Byrne, B. M., & Campbell, T. L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 555–574.
Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (2001). The relationship of teacher clarity and immediacy with student state receiver apprehension, affect, and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520109379232.
Christophel, D. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378813.
Christophel, D. M., & Gorham, J. (1995). A test-retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 44, 292–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509379020.
Davies, S., & Hammack, F. M. (2005). The channeling of student competition in higher education: Comparing Canada and the U.S. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 89–106.
Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Torrens, A., & Beck, A. (2011). Confirmation and community: The relationships among teacher confirmation, classroom community, student motivation and learning. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 1, 17–43.
Ellis, K. (2000). Perceived teacher confirmation: The development and validation of an instrument and two studies of the relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Human Communication Research, 26, 264–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00758.x.
Ellis, K. (2002). Perceived parental confirmation: Development and validation of an instrument. Southern Communication Journal, 67, 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940209373242.
Ellis, K. (2004). The impact of perceived teacher confirmation on receiver apprehension, motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 53, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452032000135742.
Fast facts. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=372
Frymier, A. B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379409369922.
Goldman, Z. W., Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2014). Revisiting the relationship between teacher confirmation and learning outcomes: Examining cultural differences in Turkish, Chinese, and American classrooms. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 43, 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2013.870087.
Goldman, Z. W., & Goodboy, A. K. (2014). Making students feel better: Examining the relationships between teacher confirmation and college students’ emotional outcomes. Communication Education, 63, 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2014.920091.
Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., Beebe, S. A., & Schultz, K. (2010). Cultural differences between United States and Chinese students’ use of behavioral alteration techniques and affinity-seeking strategies with instructors. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 39, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2010.520834.
Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2008). The effect of teacher confirmation on student communication and learning outcomes. Communication Education, 57, 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520701787777.
Greenberg, J., & Arndt, J. (2012). Terror management theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 398–415). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Haapasalo, I., Välimaa, R., & Kannas, L. (2010). How comprehensive school students perceive their psychosocial school environment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54, 133–150. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831003637915
Heggestad, R., & Kanfer, R. (2000). Individual differences in trait motivation: Development of the motivational trait questionnaire. Educational Research, 33, 751–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00049-5.
Heine, S. J. (2001). Self as cultural product: An examination of East Asian and North American selves. Journal of Personality, 69, 881–906. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696168.
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106, 766–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766.
Jääskelä, P., Nykänen, S., & Tynjälä, P. (2016). Models for the development of generic skills in Finnish higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40, 1–13. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1206858.
Jaasma, M. A., & Koper, R. J. (1999). The relationship of student-faculty out-of-class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48, 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379151.
King R. B., & McInerney, D. M. (2013). Culture’s consequences on student motivation: Capturing cross-cultural universality and variability through personal investment theory. Educational Psychologist, 49, 175–198. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.926813.
Kopp, J. P., Zinn, T. E., Finney, S. J., & Jurich, D. P. (2011). The development and evaluation of the academic entitlement questionnaire. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44, 105–129.
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1998). Emotion, motivation, and anxiety: Brain mechanisms and psychophysiology. Biological Psychiatry, 44, 1248–1263. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00275-3
Larwin, K., & Harvey, M. (2012). A demonstration of a systematic item-reduction approach using structural equation-modeling. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(2), 1–19.
Levesque, C., Zuehlke, A. N., Stanek, L. R., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Autonomy and competence in German and American university students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.68.
Linnakylä, P. (1996). Quality of school life in Finnish comprehensive school: A comparative view. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 40, 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383960400105.
Linnakylä, P., & Malin, A. (2008). Finnish students’ school engagement profiles in the light of PISA 2003. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830802497174.
Linnakylä, P., & Välijärvi, J. (2005). Arvon mekin ansaitsemme. Kansainvälinen arviointi suomalaisen koulun kehittämiseksi (Worthy of recognition? International assessment and the development of the Finnish school; in Finnish). Jyväskylä, Finland: PS-kustannus.
Maehr, M. L., & Braskamp, L. A. (1986). The motivation factor: A theory of personal investment. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
Malin, A., & Linnakyllä, P. (2001). Multilevel modelling in repeated measures of the quality of Finnish school life. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 145–166. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830120052732
Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1001/s10734-004-7649-x.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1998). The cultural psychology of personality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022198291004.
Martin, M. M., Chesebro, J. L., & Mottet, T. P. (1997). Students’ perceptions of instructors’ socio-communicative style and the influence on instructor credibility and situational motivation. Communication Research Reports, 17, 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099709388686.
Mazer, J. P. (2012). Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679244.
Mazer, J. P. (2013). Associations among teacher communication behaviors, student interest, and engagement: A validity test. Communication Education, 62, 86–96. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.731513
McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (2006). Instructional communication: The historical perspective. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 33–47). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., & Barraclough, R. A. (1995). A cross-cultural and multi-behavioral analysis of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 44, 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509379019.
Muethel, M., & Bond, M. H. (2013). National context and individual employees’ trust of the out-group: The role of societal trust. Journal of International Business Studies, 44, 312–333.
Neuliep, J. W. (1997). A cross-cultural comparison of teacher immediacy in American and Japanese college classrooms. Communication Research, 24, 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365097024004006.
Niehoff, B. P., Turnley, W. H., Yen, H. R., & Sheu, C. (2001). Exploring cultural differences in classroom expectations of students from the United States and Taiwan. Journal of Education for Business, 76, 289.
Number of university students decreased and that of degrees increased in 2014. (2015, May 6). Retrieved from http://www.stat.fi/til/yop/2014/yop_2014_2015-05-06_tie_001_en.html
Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Self and self-belief in psychology and education: A historical perspective. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievements: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 3–21). Orlando, FL: Elsevier.
Pogue, L. L., & Ahyun, K. (2006). The effect of teacher nonverbal immediacy and credibility on student motivation and affective learning. Communication Education, 55, 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520600748623.
Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181–195. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378801
Roach, K. D., & Byrne, P. R. (2001). A cross-cultural comparison of instructor communication in American and German classrooms. Communication Education, 50, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520109379228.
Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J. D., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 226–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/027243169401400207.
Sahlberg, P. (2007). Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish approach. Journal of Education Policy, 22, 147–171. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930601158919
Schrodt, P., Turman, P. D., & Soliz, J. (2006). Perceived understanding as a mediator of perceived teacher confirmation and students’ ratings of instruction. Communication Education, 55, 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520600879196.
Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., Turman, P. D., Myers, S. A., Barton, M. H., & Jernberg, K. A. (2009). Instructor credibility as a mediator of instructors’ prosocial communication behaviors and students’ learning outcomes. Communication Education, 58, 350–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520902926851.
Smith, A., & Hume, E. C. (2005). Linking culture and ethics: A comparison of accountants’ ethical belief systems in the individualism/collectivism and power distance contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-4773-1.
Smithee, M., Greeblatt, S. L., & Eland, A. (2004). U.S. culture series: U.S. classroom culture. NAFSA: Association of International Education Publications. Retrieved from http:// http://www.nafsa.org/uploaded-Files/NAFSA_Home/Resource_Library_Assets/Publications_Library/u.s.pdf
Students (2014, September 22). Retrieved from http://www.kela.fi/web/en/students.
Titsworth, S., Quinlan, M. M., & Mazer, J. P. (2010). Emotion in teaching and learning: Development and validation of the classroom emotions scale. Communication Education, 59, 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634521003746156.
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323–338.
Turman, P. D., & Schrodt, P. (2006). Student perceptions of teacher power as a function of perceived teacher confirmation. Communication Education, 55, 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520600702570.
Zhang, Q. (2005). Immediacy, humor, power distance, and classroom communication apprehension in Chinese college classrooms. Communication Quarterly, 53, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370500056150.
Zhang, Q. (2007). Teacher misbehaviors as learning demotivators in college classrooms: A cross-cultural investigation in China, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Communication Education, 56, 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520601110104.
Zhang, Q., & Huang, B. (2008). How does teacher clarity affect student learning? A multi-cultural test for the mediated effect. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 33, 10–19.
Zhang, Q., & Oetzel, J. G. (2006). Constructing and validating a teacher immediacy scale: A Chinese perspective. Communication Education, 55, 218–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520600566231.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Croucher, S.M. et al. (2021). Exploring the Relationship Between Teacher Confirmation and Student Motivation: The United States and Finland. In: López-Jiménez, M.D., Sánchez-Torres, J. (eds) Intercultural Competence Past, Present and Future. Intercultural Communication and Language Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8245-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8245-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8244-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8245-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)