Skip to main content

The Spatial Analytical Method for the Dynamic Response of Submerged Floating Tunnel with Tension Leg Under Vehicle Load

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Vibration Problems (ICOVP 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 996 Accesses

Abstract

A spatial fully analytical model of the submerged floating tunnel (SFT) with tension leg under moving vehicle load is presented and its dynamic response is studied. Unlike the existing analytical model of SFT, the global spatial structure is divided into a series of tube and cable components along the span direction. Hamilton principle is used to build the model of components, where the cables and tubes are defined in local and global Cartesians, respectively. The drag and lift forces of the components of SFT from the wave are assumed by the Morison equation. The vehicle is assumed as a moving force with constant velocity. By assembling the equations of all components through the match conditions and boundary conditions, the global equation is established. The frequencies and the modes of each component are achieved from the characteristic equation corresponding to the linear undamped free vibratory case. The results show that the presented method can effectively obtain the natural out-of-plane vibration of SFT. The effects of stiffness ratios and mass ratios on the out-of-plane frequencies are investigated. The dynamic instability regions of some key parameters are obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Martire G, Faggiano B, Mazzolani F (2010) Compared cost evaluation among traditional versus innovative strait crossing solutions. Procedia Eng 4:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sun S (2008) Dynamic response analysis of suspension tunnel, PhD thesis, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dong M, Ge F, Hui L, Hong Y Research progress of suspension tunnel in water. China Highw J 20(4):101–108

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xiang Y, Xue J (2002) Research on suspension tunnel at home and abroad. Chin Foreign Roads (6):14–16

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xiang Y, Chen Z, Yang Y (2017) Research progress of dynamic response analysis method and simulation of suspension tunnel (bilingual publication). China Highw J 30(1):69–76

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mai M, Yang X, Guan B (2008) response analysis of tension leg suspension tunnel under the action of wave flow. Chin Foreign Roads 28(1):159–163

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yan H, Luo Y, Yu J (2016) Dynamic response of submerged floating tunnel in the flow field. Procedia Eng 166:107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Qin Y, Zhou X (2010) Chaotic behavior analysis of suspension tunnel under the action of ocean current. Railw J 32(4):146–150

    Google Scholar 

  9. Qin Y, Zhou S, Zhou X (2008) Analysis of reasonable support spacing of multi-span suspension tunnel. J Railw Eng 25(3):78–81

    Google Scholar 

  10. Long X, Ge F, Wang L, Hong Y (2009) Effects of fundamental structure parameters on dynamic responses of submerged floating tunnel under hydrodynamic loads. Acta Mech Sinica 25(3):335–344

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Long X, Ge F, Hong Y (2015) Feasibility study on buoyancy-weight ratios of a submerged floating tunnel prototype subjected to hydrodynamic loads. Acta Mech Sinica 31(5):750–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shuping J, Qinxi L, Jianjun L, Gengren C, Xiang C (2016) Research on risk sensitivity of submerged floating tunnel based on analytic hierarchy process. Procedia Eng 166:255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiang Y, Lin H, Chen Z (2018) Dynamic response analysis of suspension tunnel under moving load. Vib Impact 37(4):82–87

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dong M, Zhang F, Fei T, Yang L (2016) Displacement response of tube body of suspended tunnel in water under the action of moving load with equal spacing. J Appl Mech 33(5):760–765

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang B, Liang B (2016) Study on the main influence factors of traffic loads in dynamic response of submerged floating tunnels. Procedia Eng 166:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin H, Xiang Y, Yang Y, Chen Z (2018) Dynamic response analysis for submerged floating tunnel due to fluid-vehicle-tunnel interaction. Ocean Eng 166:290–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiang Y, Chen Z, Yang Y, Lin H, Zhu S (2018) Dynamic response analysis for submerged floating tunnel with anchor-cables subjected to sudden cable breakage. Marine Struct 59:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo G, Pan S, Zhou X, Chen J, Dai B (2018) Dynamic response of suspension tunnel under the impact of underwater non-contact explosion. China Highw J 31(6):244–253

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wu Z, Ni P, Mei G (2018) Vibration response of cable for submerged floating tunnel under simultaneous hydrodynamic force and earthquake excitations. Adv Struct Eng 21(11):1761–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu Z, Liu J, Liu Z, Lu Z (2016) Parametrically excited vibrations of marine riser under random wave forces and earthquake. Adv Struct Eng 19(3):449–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dong M, Miao G, Yong L, Niu Z, Pang H, Hou C (2012) Effect of escape device for submerged floating tunnel (SFT) on hydrodynamic loads applied to SFT. J Hydrodyn Ser. B 24(4):609–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Luo G, Shi Y, Shen Q, Li H (2012) Analysis of lateral dynamic characteristics of anchor cables in suspension tunnels in water, PhD thesis

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sun S, Su Z (2011) Parametric vibration of submerged floating tunnel tether under random excitation. China Ocean Eng 25(2):349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Su Z, Sun S (2013) Seismic response of submerged floating tunnel tether. China Ocean Eng 27(1):43–50

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Yan H, Yuan Y, Yu J (2016) Fatigue reliability analysis of cable considering corrosion. Procedia Eng 166:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the funding from the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2015CB057706), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11002030), the National Science Fund of Hunan Province (No. 2018JJ2436), and the innovation team of the safety assessment theory and performance technology of the long-span bridge of Changsha University of Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhuangpeng Yi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1. \(\mathbb {M}_{i}\) for Out-of-Plane Vibration

When \(i=1\sim n\), the elements for the modal connection matrix \(\mathbb {M}_{i}\) between ith cable and the corresponding arch segment in Eq. (22) are

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} \mathbb {M}_{i}(1,1)=&\,0,~~~\mathbb {M}_{i}(1,2)=0,&\mathbb {M}_{i}(1,3)=&\,0,~~~\mathbb {M}_{i}(1,4)=0, \\ \mathbb {M}_{i}(2,1)=&\cos {l_{ai}}\eta _{i1}\csc {l_{ci}\zeta _i},&\mathbb {M}_{i}(2,2)=&\sin {l_{ai}}\eta _{i1}\csc {l_{ci}\zeta _i}, \\ \mathbb {M}_{i}(2,3)=&\cosh {l_{ai}}\eta _{i2}\csc {l_{ci}\zeta _i},&\mathbb {M}_{i}(2,4)=&\sinh {l_{ai}}\eta _{i2}\csc {l_{ci}\zeta _i}, \\ \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(28)

and when \(i=n+1\sim n+m\) the elements are

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} \mathbb {M}_{i}(1,1)=&\,0,~~~\mathbb {M}_{i}(1,2)=0,&\mathbb {M}_{i}(1,3)=&\,0,~~~\mathbb {M}_{i}(1,4)=0, \\ \mathbb {M}_{i}(2,1)=&\cos {l_{ai}}\eta _{i1}\csc {l_{ci}\zeta _i},&\mathbb {M}_{i}(2,2)=&-\sin {l_{ai}}\eta _{i1}\csc {l_{ci}\zeta _i}, \\ \mathbb {M}_{i}(2,3)=&\cosh {l_{ai}}\eta _{i2}\csc {l_{ci}\zeta _i},&\mathbb {M}_{i}(2,4)=&-\sinh {l_{ai}}\eta _{i2}\csc {l_{ci}\zeta _i}, \\ \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(29)

Appendiix 2. \(\mathbb {T}_{i}\) and \(\mathbb {R}_{i}\) for Out-of-Plane Vibration

By substituting the shape functions of arch segments shown in Eq. (18) and the shape functions of cables shown in Eq. (17) into the connected matching conditions in Eq. (21), the relationships between two adjacent arch segments can be obtained as follow:

$$\begin{aligned} \cos \eta _{i1}l_{ai}A_{i1}&+\sin \eta _{i1}l_{ai}A_{i2}+\cosh \eta _{i2}l_{ai}A_{i3}+\sinh \eta _{i2}l_{ai}A_{i4}=A_{(i+1)1}+A_{(i+1)3}\end{aligned}$$
(30)
$$\begin{aligned} -\eta _{i1}\sin \eta _{i1}l_{ai}A_{i1}&+\eta _{i1}\cos \eta _{i1}l_{ai}A_{i2}+\eta _{i2}\sinh \eta _{i2}l_{ai}A_{i3}+\eta _{i2}\cosh \eta _{i2}l_{ai}A_{i4}\nonumber \\&=\eta _{(i+1)1}A_{(i+1)2}+\eta _{(i+1)2}A_{(i+1)4}\end{aligned}$$
(31)
$$\begin{aligned} -\eta _{i1}^2\cos \eta _{i1}l_{ai}A_{i1}&-\eta _{i1}^2\sin \eta _{i1}l_{ai}A_{i2}+\eta _{i2}^2\cosh \eta _{i2}l_{ai}A_{i3}+\eta _{i2}^2\sinh \eta _{i2}l_{ai}A_{i4}\nonumber \\&=-\eta _{(i+1)1}^2A_{(i+1)1}+\eta _{(i+1)2}^2A_{(i+1)3}\end{aligned}$$
(32)
$$\begin{aligned} \chi _{wi}[\eta _{i1}^3\sin \eta _{i1}l_{ai}A_{i1}&-\eta _{i1}^3\cos \eta _{i1}l_{ai}A_{i2}+\eta _{i2}^3\sinh \eta _{i2}l_{ai}A_{i3}+\eta _{i2}^3\cosh \eta _{i2}l_{ai}A_{i4}]\nonumber \\&=\chi _{wi}[-\eta _{(i+1)1}^3A_{(i+1)2}+\eta _{(i+1)2}^3A_{(i+1)4}]-\zeta _{i}\sin \zeta _{i}l_{ci}C_{i1}+\zeta _{i}\cos \zeta _{i}l_{ci}C_{i2} \end{aligned}$$
(33)

Therefore, Eq. (23) is built, when \(i=1\sim n\) the elements of \(\mathop {\mathbb {T}_{i}}\) and \(\mathop {\mathbb {R}_{i}}\) are

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} \mathbb {T}_{i}(1,1)=&\,\frac{r_{i1}\eta _{(i+1)1}}{\eta _{i1}}\cos \eta _{i1}l_{ai}; \mathbb {T}_{i}(1,2)= \frac{r_{i1}\eta _{(i+1)1}}{\eta _{i1}}\sin \eta _{i1}l_{ai};\\ \mathbb {T}_{i}(1,3)=&\,\frac{r_{i2}\eta _{(i+1)1}}{\eta _{i2}}\cosh \eta _{i2}l_{ai}; \mathbb {T}_{i}(1,4)= \frac{r_{i2}\eta _{(i+1)1}}{\eta _{i2}}\sinh \eta _{i2}l_{ai};\\ \mathbb {T}_{i}(2,1)=&\,-r_{i1}\sin \eta _{i1}l_{ai}; \mathbb {T}_{i}(2,2)= r_{i1}\cos \eta _{i1}l_{ai};\\ \mathbb {T}_{i}(2,3)=&\,r_{i2}\sinh \eta _{i2}l_{ai}; \mathbb {T}_{i}(2,4)= r_{i2}\cosh \eta _{i2}l_{ai};\\ \mathbb {T}_{i}(3,1)=&\,\frac{r_{i3}\eta _{(i+1)2}}{\eta _{i1}}\cos \eta _{i1}l_{ai}; \mathbb {T}_{i}(3,2)= \frac{r_{i3}\eta _{(i+1)2}}{\eta _{i1}}\sin \eta _{i1}l_{ai};\\ \mathbb {T}_{i}(3,3)=&\,\frac{r_{i4}\eta _{(i+1)2}}{\eta _{i2}}\cosh \eta _{i2}l_{ai}; \mathbb {T}_{i}(3,4)= \frac{r_{i4}\eta _{(i+1)2}}{\eta _{i2}}\sinh \eta _{i2}l_{ai};\\ \mathbb {T}_{i}(4,1)=&\,-r_{i3}\sin \eta _{i1}l_{ai}; \mathbb {T}_{i}(4,2)= r_{i3}\cos \eta _{i1}l_{ai};\\ \mathbb {T}_{i}(4,3)=&\,r_{i4}\sinh \eta _{i2}l_{ai}; \mathbb {T}_{i}(4,4)= r_{i4}\cosh \eta _{i2}l_{ai};\\ \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(34)

and

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} \mathbb {R}_{i}(1,1)=&\,0;~ \mathbb {R}_{i}(1,2)=0;~ \mathbb {R}_{i}(2,1)=\frac{r_{i5}\zeta _i\sin \zeta _il_{ci}}{\eta _{(i+1)1}\chi _{wi}};~ \mathbb {R}_{i}(2,2)=-\frac{r_{i5}\zeta _i\cos \zeta _il_{ci}}{\eta _{(i+1)1}\chi _{wi}};\\ \mathbb {R}_{i}(3,1)=&\,0;~\mathbb {R}_{i}(3,2)=0;~ \mathbb {R}_{i}(4,1)=-\frac{r_{i5}\zeta _i\sin \zeta _il_{ci}}{\eta _{(i+1)2}\chi _{wi}};~ \mathbb {R}_{i}(4,2)=\frac{r_{i5}\zeta _i\cos \zeta _il_{ci}}{\eta _{(i+1)2}\chi _{wi}};\\ \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(35)

where \(r_{i1}\sim r_{i5}\) are simplifying coefficients.

Appendix 3. Boundary Matrixes for Out-of-Plane Vibration

$$\begin{aligned} \mathop {\mathbb {B}_{\text {L}}}= \left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 1 &{}0 &{}1 &{}0 \\ 0 &{}\eta _{11} &{}0 &{}\eta _{12} \\ \end{array} \right] , \end{aligned}$$
(36)
$$\begin{aligned} \mathop {\mathbb {B}_{\text {R0}}}= \left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 1 &{}0 &{}1 &{}0 \\ 0 &{}\eta _{(n+m)1} &{}0 &{}\eta _{(n+m)2} \\ \end{array} \right] , \end{aligned}$$
(37)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yi, Z., Yan, D., Zeng, Y. (2021). The Spatial Analytical Method for the Dynamic Response of Submerged Floating Tunnel with Tension Leg Under Vehicle Load. In: Sapountzakis, E.J., Banerjee, M., Biswas, P., Inan, E. (eds) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Vibration Problems. ICOVP 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8049-9_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8049-9_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8048-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8049-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics